Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:45:39.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social role of protected areas in the new South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Michael P. Wells
Michael P. Wells*
Affiliation:
Tunnelveien, 3, 3400 Lier, Norway
*
* Michael P. Wells Tel: +47 3284 1542 Fax: +47 3284 0827 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

South Africa contains an extensive, well-managed protected area network which generates considerable economic benefits from tourism, but the extensive land and financial resources required by the parks and reserves are difficult to reconcile with the acute social and economic development needs of poor rural people with very limited access to any kind of resources. Local communities have incurred substantial costs from the establishment of these parks while receiving few benefits in return. National and provincial governments, as well as the conservation authorities, have now recognized that the long-term future of parks and reserves depends on taking effective steps to redress the local imbalance of benefits and costs. Integrated conservation-development projects (ICDPs) are beginning to test a range of specific measures to increase local community participation in the benefits from protected areas. Parks have considerable resources and expertise which they can use to support local development through ICDPs, although it would be unrealistic to expect parks to solve widespread rural poverty amongst their neighbours. Instead, park authorities should take the lead in forming partnerships to mobilize the combined resources and expertise of other national and provincial government agencies, NGOs and the private sector, as well as the local communities themselves. Community participation in wildlife tourism may best be achievable through joint ventures with the private sector or park management authorities.

Keywords

parksparticipationSouth Africaintegrated conservation-development projectscommunitiesinstitutions
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 322 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. & Grove, R., eds. (1987) Conservation in Africa: People, Policies and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: ix + 355 pp.Google Scholar
Ashley, C. & Garland, E. (1994) Promoting community-based tourism development: why, what and how? Research Discussion Paper No. 4, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia: 37 pp.Google Scholar
Brandon, K. & Wells, M. (1992) Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Development 20(4): 557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, C., Mander, M., A'Bear, D., Little, T. & Pollett, T. (1992) Social conceptions of the roles and benefits of national parks. Occasional Paper No. 119, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Natal, Pieter-maritzburg, South Africa: 8 pp.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1993) ‘Police boys’ and poachers: Africans, wildlife protection and national parks, the Transvaal 1902 to 1950. Koedoe 36(2): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1994). Dissecting the myth: Paul Kruger and the Kruger National Park. Journal of Southern African Studies 20(2): 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1995) The Kruger National Park: A Social and Political History. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Natal University Press: v + 170 pp.Google Scholar
Davies, R.J. (1993) Cost benefit analysis of Pilannesberg National Park. Unpublished Master's Degree research report, Graduate School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, Midrand, South Africa: 112 pp.Google Scholar
Fig, D. (1994) Ecotourism. Unpublished briefing paper for the IDRC/ANC/COSATU/SACP/SANCO Mission on Environmental Policy, Group for Environmental Monitoring, Johannesburg, South Africa: 20 pp.Google Scholar
Fig, D. & Archer, F. (1993) Empowerment and the environment: Towards effective community participation in the management of Richtersveld National Park, South Africa. Unpublished report, Group for Environmental Monitoring, Johannesburg, South Africa: 21 pp.Google Scholar
GEM (1994) People and Parks Project: Annual Conference Proceedings (September 30-October 2, 1994). Group for Environmental Monitoring, Johannesburg, South Africa: 66 pp.Google Scholar
Grossman, D., Ferrar, T. & Du Plessis, P. (1992) Socio-economic factors influencing conservation in South Africa. TRAFFIC Bulletin 13(1): 29–31.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. & Koch, E. (1995) Nature tourism in South Africa: links with the Reconstruction and Development Program. Unpublished report for Satour, Pretoria, South Africa: 76 pp.Google Scholar
Hanekom, D. & Liebenberg, L. (1994) Utilization of national Parks with special reference to the costs and benefits to communities. Bulletin of the Grasslands Society of South Africa 5(2): 25–36.Google Scholar
IDRC (1994) Environment, reconstruction and development in the new South Africa. Report of the IDRC/ANC/COSATU/SACP/SANCO Mission on Environmental Policy, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada: vi + 140 pp.Google Scholar
IIED (1994) Whose Eden? An overview of community approaches to wildlife management. Report to the British Overseas Development Administration, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK: xv + 124 pp.Google Scholar
Kiss, A., ed. (1990) Living with wildlife: wildlife resource management with local participation in Africa. Technical Paper No. 130, Africa Technical Department Series, World Bank, Washington, DC: xi + 217 pp.Google Scholar
Koch, E. (1994) Reality or rhetoric? Ecotourism and rural reconstruction in South Africa. Discussion Paper No. 54, UN Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva: v + 58 pp.Google Scholar
Koch, E., Nyoni, J. & Associates (1995) Dead cows, a long bicycle ride, the fence of fire and a man on the run: linking human livelihoods, transfron-tier conservation and the protection of biological diversity in Southern Africa. Unpublished report for UN Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva and Group for Environmental Monitoring, Johannesburg, South Africa: 215 pp.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, L. & Grossman, D. (1994) Towards a new conservation policy. Policy Paper No. 8, Land and Agriculture Policy Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa: 40 pp.Google Scholar
Makombe, K., ed. (1993) Sharing the land: Wildlife, people and development in Africa. IUCN/ROSA Environmental Issues Series 1. IUCN Regional Office for Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe: 32 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1988) Economics and Biodiversity: Developing and using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: xiv + 232 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1993) Economic incentives for conserving biodiversity: lessons from Africa. Ambio 22(2–3): 144–150.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, S. (1994) The Zimbabwe Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). In: Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. Western, D., Wright, M. & Strum, S., pp. 161–92. Washington, DC: Island Press, xix + 559 pp.Google Scholar
Murphree, M.W. (1994) The role of institutions in community-based conservation. In: Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. Western, D., Wright, M. & Strum, S., pp. 403–27. Washington, DC: Island Press, xix + 559 pp.Google Scholar
Natal Parks Board (1994) Annual Report 1993–94. Natal Parks Board, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: 22 pp.Google Scholar
National Parks Board (1994) Annual Report 1993–94. National Parks Board, Pretoria, South Africa: 103 pp.Google Scholar
National Parks Board (1995) Annual Report 1994–95. National Parks Board, Pretoria, South Africa: 107 pp.Google Scholar
Venter, A., Marais, C. & Breem, C. (1994) Kruger National Park: managing for the future: integrating the goals of conservation and the development of local communities. Occasional Paper No. 149, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: 8 pp.Google Scholar
Venter, A.K., Venter, A.J. & Botha, J. (1995). One small step … The Kruger National Parks Small Business Development Project. Occasional Paper No. 157, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: 16 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, M. (1992) Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them. Ambio 21(3): 237–43.Google Scholar
Wells, M. (1995) Biodiversity conservation and local development aspirations: new priorities for the 1990s. In: Biodiversity Conservation: Policy Issues and Options, ed. Perrings, C., Maler, K.G., Folke, C.Holling, C.S. & Jansson, B.O., pp. 319–34. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.: xvi + 404 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M. (in press). The social and economic role of protected areas in the New South Africa. Unpublished report, Land and Agriculture Policy Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Wells, M., Brandon, K. & Hannah, L. (1992) People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. World Bank, Washington, DC: xii + 99 pp.Google Scholar
West, P.C. & Brechin, S.R. eds. (1991) Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in Snternational Conservation. Tuczon, USA: University of Arizona Press: xxiv + 443 pp.Google Scholar
Western, D., Wright, M. & Strum, S. eds. (1994) Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press: xix + 559 pp.Google Scholar