Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:51:25.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shadow-pricing Environmental Goods and Services, Using the Enmergy Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Gonzague Pillet  and
Andrea Baranzini
Gonzague Pillet
Affiliation:
Centre for Human Ecology & Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Box 266, 1227 Carouge, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrea Baranzini
Affiliation:
Centre for Human Ecology & Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Box 266, 1227 Carouge, Geneva, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communications & Reports
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1988 , pp. 263 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lavine, J.J. & Butler, T.J. (1982). Use of Embodied Energy Values to Price Environmental Factors: Examining the Embodied Energy/Dollar Relationship. Final report on NSF Award PRA-8003845. Center for Environmental Research, Department of Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA: 40 pp. + Appendices A-I, illustr. [The results of this specific study's regression analysis have shown that the sunlight measure of embodied energy value might explain from 92 to 99% of the variation in economic value cross-sectionally (87 sectors), and from 95 to 99% temporally (1929–76 for the U.S. economy).] Cf. also C.J.R. Cleveland et al. (1984), Energy and the U.S. economy: a biophysical perspective (Science, 204, pp. 890–7).Google Scholar
Odum, H.T. (1983). Systems Ecology—an Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, New York-Chichester-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore: xv + 644 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Odum, H.T. (1984). Summary: Cypress swamps and their regional role. Pp. 416–43 in Cypress Swamps (Eds Ewel, K.C. & Odum, H.T.). University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida, USA: xviii + 472 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Odum, H.T. (1986). Enmergy in ecosystems. Pp. 337–69 in Ecosystem Theory and Application (Ed. Polunin, N.). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore: xv + 445 pp., illustr. [On thisoccasion, Nicholas Polunin suggested to use the terms enmergy and enmjoule instead of ‘emergy’ and ‘emjoule’ to avoid confusion.]Google Scholar
Pillet, G. (1986). From external effects to energy externality: New proposals in environmental economics. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 27(1), pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
Pillet, G. (1987). Case-study of the role of environment as an energy externality in Geneva vineyard cultivation and wine production. Environmental Conservation, 14(1), pp. 53–8, 19 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scienceman, D.M. (1987). Energy and emergy. Pp. 257–76 in Environmental Economics—the Analysis of a Major Interface (Eds Pillet, G. & Murota, T.). R. Leimgruber, 9 rue Jentzer, Geneva, Switzerland: x + 310 pp., illustr.Google Scholar