Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:08:08.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of consumer knowledge in reducing the demand for palm oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2020

Florian Lange Open the ORCID record for Florian Lange [Opens in a new window]  and
Lauranne Coremans
Florian Lange*
Affiliation:
BEE – Behavioral Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000Leuven, Belgium
Lauranne Coremans
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000Leuven, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Florian Lange, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Attempts to mitigate the environmental impact of oil-palm expansion by improving production standards have been of limited success. An alternative approach aims at a better understanding of the factors that drive consumers to reduce excessive vegetable oil consumption. Our studies focused on consumers’ environmental knowledge as a potential determinant of palm oil consumption. They revealed critical limitations in consumers’ palm oil-related knowledge across different domains, study settings and assessment approaches. The more our participants knew about palm oil and its environmental consequences, the stronger were their reported intentions to reduce their consumption. This relationship was significantly stronger for subjective versus objective palm oil-related knowledge. In addition, we examined whether consumers can be stimulated to consult information about palm oil by making information access the default option. While this simple situational nudge promoted information access, we did not find it to significantly increase actual engagement with the information material. This result suggests that it might be necessary to complement default nudges for information access with other measures to enhance palm oil-related knowledge and to reduce palm oil consumption to more sustainable levels.

Keywords

biodiversity conservationconservation (ecological behaviour)consumer behaviourenvironmental knowledgenudgingoil palmpro-environmental behaviour
Type
Report
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 84 - 88
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartkus, KR, Hartman, CL, Howell, RD (1999) The measurement of consumer environmental knowledge: revisions and extensions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 14: 129–146.Google Scholar
Carlson, KM, Heilmayr, R, Gibbs, HK, Noojipady, P, Burns, DN, Morton, DCet al. (2018) Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corley, RHV (2009) How much palm oil do we need? Environmental Science & Policy 12: 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, K (2005) Environmental Literacy in America: What Ten Years of NEETF/Roper Research and Related Studies Say about Environmental Literacy in the US. Washington, DC, USA: National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F, Beukema, H, Burgess, ND, Parish, F, Brühl, CA, Donald, PFet al. (2009) Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conservation Biology 23: 348–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dislich, C, Keyel, AC, Salecker, J, Kisel, Y, Meyer, KM, Auliya, Met al. (2017) A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system. Biological Reviews 92: 1539–1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, DP, Hodgson, JA, Hamer, KC, Mitchell, SL, Ahmad, AH, Cornell, SJ, Wilcove, DS (2010) Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conservation Letters 3: 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzherbert, EB, Struebig, MJ, Morel, A, Danielsen, F, Brühl, CA, Donald, PF, Phalan, B (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 538–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foxx, RM, Hake, DF (1977) Gasoline conservation: A procedure for measuring and reducing the driving of college students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geller, ES, Farris, JC, Post, DS (1973) Prompting a consumer behavior for pollution control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 6: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giam, X, Mani, L, Koh, LP, Tan, HT (2016) Saving tropical forests by knowing what we consume. Conservation Letters 9: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R (2014) Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology 65: 541–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isenhour, C (2014) Trading fat for forests: on palm oil, tropical forest conservation, and rational consumption. Conservation and Society 12: 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachimowicz, J, Duncan, S, Weber, EU, Johnson, EJ (2019) When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy 3: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, LP, Lee, TM (2012) Sensible consumerism for environmental sustainability. Biological Conservation 151: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, LP, Wilcove, DS (2008) Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters 1: 60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmuss, A, Agyeman, J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8: 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, F, Dewitte, S (2019) Measuring pro-environmental behavior: review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 63: 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, WF, Koh, LP, Butler, R, Sodhi, NS, Bradshaw, CJ, Neidel, JDet al. (2010) Improving the performance of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 24: 377–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehman, PK, Geller, ES (2004) Behavior analysis and environmental protection: accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues 13: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, XL, Rosenthal, R, Rubin, DB (1992) Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin 111: 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, DJ (2014) The future of oil palm as a major global crop: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Oil Palm Research 26: 1–24.Google Scholar
Ostfeld, R, Howarth, D, Reiner, D, Krasny, P (2019) Peeling back the label – exploring sustainable palm oil ecolabelling and consumption in the United Kingdom. Environmental Research Letters 14: 014001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, LE, de Oliveira Roque, F, Campbell, MJ, Younes, N, Edwards, W, Laurance, WF (2018) Identifying critical limits in oil palm cover for the conservation of terrestrial mammals in Colombia. Biological Conservation 227: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, EL, Lowry, R, Dorrian, J, Litchfield, CA (2014) Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: ‘Don’t Palm Us Off’ for orang-utan conservation. Zoo Biology 33: 184–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, PM, MacKenzie, SB, Lee, JY, Podsakoff, NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steg, L, Vlek, C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, CR, Reisch, LA (2014) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review 38: 127–158.Google Scholar
Winett, RA, Nietzel, MT (1975) Behavioral ecology: contingency management of consumer energy use. American Journal of Community Psychology 3: 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lange and Coremans Supplementary Materials

Lange and Coremans Supplementary Materials

Download Lange and Coremans Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 558.7 KB