Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:47:48.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private-land control and deforestation dynamics in the context of implementing the Native Forest Law in the Northern Argentinian Dry Chaco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Sofia Marinaro Open the ORCID record for Sofia Marinaro [Opens in a new window] ,
Nestor Ignacio Gasparri  and
Veronica Piriz-Carrillo
Sofia Marinaro*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología Regional (CONICET-UNT), Residencia Universitaria de Horco Molle, Edificio Las Cúpulas, Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina Centro de Estudio y Aplicación del Ciclo de Indagación (CEyACI), Fac. de Cs. Naturales e IML, Tucumán, Argentina
Nestor Ignacio Gasparri
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología Regional (CONICET-UNT), Residencia Universitaria de Horco Molle, Edificio Las Cúpulas, Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e IML, Tucumán, Argentina
Veronica Piriz-Carrillo
Affiliation:
Independent professional
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Sofia Marinaro, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Subtropical dry forests are among the largest and most threatened terrestrial biomes worldwide. In Argentina, the Native Forest Law (NFL) was passed in 2007 to regulate deforestation by mandating the provincial zonation of forested areas, while the erection of fences has been an increasingly common mechanism of private-land control reinforcement in the region; this is mainly fuelled by imminent land-use changes, recent land transactions or subsidies from the NFL. We explored the dynamics between the erection of fences and deforestation in the Northern Argentinian Dry Chaco (NADC) during the implementation of the NFL. We found that a third of land deforested during 2000–2017 had been previously fenced, with the highest percentage (44%) occurring during the sanction of the NFL (2007) and the completion of the forest-zonation maps (2011). Only 34% of deforestation within fenced areas occurred in zones where deforestation was legally permitted. In total, 327 386 ha of forests had been fenced within NADC by 2017, representing areas of potential access restriction for local people, who historically used forest resources for survival. Additionally, 57% of the fenced area occurred in zones where deforestation was restricted. A novel remote-sensing application can serve as an early-warning tool for deforestation.

Keywords

common-pool resourcesecosystem servicesforest-zonation mapsindigenous communitiesland-use changesopen accesspeasants
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 277 - 283
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguiar, S, Mastrangelo, ME, García Collazo, MA, Camba Sans, GH, Mosso, CE, Ciuffoli, L et al. (2018) ¿Cuál es la situación de la Ley de Bosques en la Región Chaqueña a diez años de su sanción? Revisar su pasado para discutir su futuro. Ecología Austral 28: 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aide, TM, Clark, D, Grau, HR, Levy, M, Carr, D, Redo, D, Andrade, M (2013) Deforestation and forest expansion in Latin America: 2001–2010. Biotropica 45: 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altrichter, M, Basurto, X (2008) Effects of land privatisation on the use of common-pool resources of varying mobility in the Argentine Chaco. Conservation and Society 6: 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenas, P (2003) Etnografía y Alimentación entre los TobaNachilamole#ek y Wichi-Lhukutas del Chaco Central (Argentina), 1st edn. Buenos Aires: Latín Gráfica SRL, 562 pp.Google Scholar
Baumann, M, Gasparri, NI, Piquer-Rodríguez, M, Gavier Pizarro, G, Griffiths, P, Hostert, P et al. (2017) Carbon emissions from agricultural expansion and intensification in the Chaco. Global Change Biology 23: 1902–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrol, DA, Cáceres, DM (2017) Las disputas por los bienes comunes y su impacto en la apropiación de servicios ecosistémicos. La Ley de Protección de Bosques Nativos, en la Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina. Ecología Austral 27: 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, DM (2015) Accumulation by dispossession and socio-environmental conflicts caused by the expansion of agribusiness in Argentina. Journal of Agrarian Change 15: 116–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camba Sans, GH, Aguiar, S, Vallejos, M, Paruelo, JM (2018) Assessing the effectiveness of a land zoning policy in the Dry Chaco. The case of Santiago del Estero, Argentina. Land Use Policy 70: 313–321.Google Scholar
Curtis, PG, Slay, CM, Harris, NL, Tyukavina, A, Hansen, MC (2018) Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361: 1108–1111.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawson, NM, Martin, A (2015) Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being: a disaggregated study in western Rwanda. Ecological Economics 117: 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sy, V, Herold, M, Achard, F, Beuchle, R, Clevers, JGPW, Lindquist, E, Verchot, L (2015) Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America. Environmental Research Letters 10: 124004 Google Scholar
Fairbairn, M (2014) ‘Like gold with yield’: evolving intersections between farmland and finance. Journal of Peasant Studies 41: 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehlenberg, V, Baumann, M, Gasparri, NI, Piquer-Rodriguez, M, Gavier-Pizarro, G, Kuemmerle, T (2017) The role of soybean production as an underlying driver of deforestation in the South American Chaco. Global Environmental Change 45: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, PD, Kuemmerle, T, Baumann, M, Grau, HR, Nasca, JA, Radrizzani, A, Gasparri, NI (2020) Understanding the distribution of cattle production systems in the South American Chaco. Journal of Land Use Science 15: 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Collazo, MA, Panizza, A, Paruelo, JM (2013) Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos: Resultados de la Zonificación realizada por provincias del Norte argentino. Ecología Austral 23: 97–107.Google Scholar
Gardner, T, Godar, J, Garrett, R (2014). Governing for sustainability in agricultural-forest frontiers: a case study of the Brazilian Amazon (Rep.). Stockholm Environment Institute [www document]. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep00384 Google Scholar
Gasparri, NI, Grau, HR, Angonese, JG (2013) Linkages between soybean and neotropical deforestation: coupling and transient decoupling dynamics in a multi-decadal analysis. Global Environmental Change 23: 1605–1614.Google Scholar
Grau, HR, Gasparri, NI, Aide, TM (2008) Balancing food production and nature conservation in the neotropical dry forest of northern Argentina. Global Change Biology 14: 985–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, MC, Potapov, PV, Moore, R, Hancher, M, Turubanova, SA, Tyukavina, A et al. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krapovickas, J, Sacchi, LV, Hafner, R (2016) Firewood supply and consumption in the context of agrarian change: the North Argentine Chaco from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of the Commons 10: 220–243.Google Scholar
le Polain de Waroux, Y, Baumann, M, Gasparri, NI, Gavier-Pizarro, GI, Godar, J, Kuemmerle, T et al. (2018). Rents, actors, and the expansion of commodity frontiers in the Gran Chaco. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108: 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
le Polain de Waroux, Y, Garrett, RD, Heilmayr, R, Lambin, EF (2016) Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 4021–4026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leake, A, Ecónomo, M (2008) La deforestación de Salta 2004–2007. Salta, Argentina: Fundación ASOCIANA.Google Scholar
Longhi, F (2014) Desnutrición y Muerte en la Niñez argentina en los Albores del Siglo XXI: Un Análisis Espacial. Journal of Latin American Geography 13: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinaro, S, Grau, HR, Gasparri, NI, Kuemmerle, T, Baumann, M (2017) Differences in production, carbon stocks and biodiversity outcomes of land tenure regimes in the Argentine Dry Chaco. Environmental Research Letters 12: 045003.Google Scholar
Maxwell, SL, Fuller, RA, Brooks, TM, Watson, JEM (2016) Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536: 143–145 Google ScholarPubMed
Portillo-Quintero, GA, Sánchez-Azofeifa, CA (2010) Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biological Conservation 143: 144–155.Google Scholar
Ribot, JC, Peluso, NL (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68: 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAyDS (2018) Informe de estado de implementación 2010–2018. Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos y planes alcanzados por el Fondo Nacional para el Enriquecimiento y la Conservación de los Bosques Nativos [www document]. URL https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/informe_de_implementacion_2018.pdf Google Scholar
Seghezzo, L, Volante, JN, Paruelo, JM, Somma, DJ, Buliubasich, EC, Rodríguez, HE et al. (2011) Native forests and agriculture in Salta (Argentina): conflicting visions of development. Journal of Environment & Development 20: 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volante, JN, Mosciaro, MJ, Gavier-Pizarro, GI, Paruelo, JM (2016) Agricultural expansion in the Semiarid Chaco: poorly selective contagious advance. Land Use Policy 55: 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volante, JN, Seghezzo, L (2018) Can’t see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement? Ecological Economics 146: 408–413.Google Scholar
Zepharovich, E, Ceddia, MG, Rist, S (2020) Perception of deforestation in the Argentine Chaco: combining Q-method and environmental justice. Ecological Economics 171: 106598.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marinaro et al. supplementary material

Marinaro et al. supplementary material

Download Marinaro et al. supplementary material(File)
File 440.6 KB