Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:59:16.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mercury problem and diets in the Brazilian Amazon: planning a solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Evaldice Eve ,
Evaldo F. Oliveira  and
Christopher Eve
Evaldice Eve*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Saude Coletiva, Instituto de Saude Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Correa s/n, Coxipo, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil CEP 78060–900.
Evaldo F. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Quimica, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Correa s/n, Coxipo, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil CEP 78060–900
Christopher Eve
Affiliation:
Systems Department, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK
*
* Dr Evaldice Eve Tel: +55 65 315 8881 Fax: +55 65 361 1119 e-mail. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In order to determine whether mercury from distant goldmining affected health in the districts of lranduba and Barreirinha, Amazonas State, Brazil, mercury in the scalp hair of 101 peasants (39 males and 62 females) was determined by cold vapour atomic absorption. In both areas fish is the major source of dietary protein. The average hair mercury content was 38.6 ppm (1SD = 14.1) in Barreirinha, where the diet contains a high proportion of carnivorous fish, and 5.6 ppm (1SD = 3.1) in Iranduba, where the diet contains more herbivorous fish. The levels found in women's hair in Barreirinha are particularly critical in view of the evidence that peak maternal hair mercury levels above 70 ppm are associated with 30% of risk of neurological disorder in the offspring, and that 5% risk may be associated with a peak mercury level of 10–20 ppm in the maternal hair (WHO 1990).

The health of many people, and thus forest preservation, are threatened. An environmental monitoring and health programme is urgently needed for the Brazilian Amazon. Dietary assessment could be a useful indicator of the risk of mercury poisoning, if taken together with periodic analysis of mercury contents of commonly eaten fishes and of scalp hair, particularly that of young and pregnant women. Environmental monitoring is pointless if not directed at effective action; and a planning approach to this is suggested which includes a major educational component.

Keywords

mercury poisoningplanning solutionsfish dietswomen's dietsgold-miningfish contamination
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 133 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agemian, H. & Cheaner, V. (1978) Simultaneous extraction of mercury and arsenic from fish tissues and an automated determination by atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry Acta 101: 193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airey, D. (1983) Mercury in human hair due to environment and diet: a review. Environmental Health Perspectives 52: 303–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amoroso, M.C.M. (1981) Alimentacao em urn bairro pobre de Manaus, Amazonas. Acta Amazonica 11(3) (Supplement): 1–43.Google Scholar
Brazil, (1975) Estabelece o limite de Tolerancia para o mercurio em peixes, crustaceos e moluscos. Ministerio da Saude, Secretaria Nacional da Saude — Comissao Nacional de Normas e Padroes para Alimentos, Resolucao no. 18 de agosto de 1975. Diario Official Brasilia; 19 December 1975. Secao 1: 16378.Google Scholar
Brike, G., Johnels, A.G., Plautin, L.O., Sjostrand, B., Skerfoing, S. & Westermark, T. (1972) Humans exposed to methylmercury through fish consumption. Archives of Environmental Health 25: 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, L. (1992) Brazil's mercury poisoning disaster. British Medical Journal 304: 1397.Google Scholar
Coghlan, A. (1996) Cleaner gold improves miners’ prospects. New Scientist 6 April: 11.Google Scholar
Cruz, M.F. (1987) Ouro: Historia Refino e Comercializacao. Bolsa Mercantil & de Futuros, Sao Paulo, Brazil: 25 pp.Google Scholar
Eve, E. (1987) Food policy, nutrition intervention and economic development in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. M.Sc. thesis, University College Swansea, Wales, UK: 73 pp.Google Scholar
Eve, E. (1995) Amazon peasants livelihoods: current character and problems of sustainability – are food security and health critical factors? Ph.D. thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England, UK: 335 pp.Google Scholar
Fernandes, R.S., Guimaraes, A.F. & Bidone, E.D. (1990) Monitoramento do mercurio na area do Projeto Carajas. Sane amento Ambiental 6: 34–41.Google Scholar
Gersovitz, M. & Madden, J.P. (1978) Validity of the 24 hours dietary recall and seven days record for group comparisons. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 73: 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandjean, P., Cardoso, B. & Guimaraes, G. (1993) Mercury poisoning. The Lancet 342: 991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guigliano, R., Shrimpton, R., Arckoll, D.B., Guigliano, L.G. & Petrere, M. (1978) Diagnostico da Realidade Alimentar e Nutritional do Estado do Amazonas. Acta Amazonica 8 (Supplement 2): 5–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellstrom, T.E. & Reeves, L.R. (1982) Comparison of mercury in hair with fish eating habits of children in Auckland. Community Health Studies 6(1): 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, O., Pfeiffer, W.C., Souza, C.M.M. & Reuther, R. (1990) Mercury pollution due to gold-mining in the Madeira Basin, Brazil. Ambio 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
Marr, J.W. (1971) Individual dietary survey: purposes and methods. World Review of Nutrition Dietetics 13: 105–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, W.C. & Lacerda, L.D. (1988) Mercury inputs into the Amazon region, Brazil. Environmental Technology Letters 29: 325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, W.C., Lacerda, L.D., Malm, O., Souza, C.M.M., Silveira, E.G. & Basos, R.R. (1989) Mercury concentration in inland waters of goldmine areas in Rondonia, Brazil. The Science of the Total Environment 87(8): 233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzoni, A. (1989) Mercury in scalp hair of Maldivians. Marine Pollution Bulletin 20(2): 93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, R.Y., Aguiar, J.P.L., Marinho, H.A. & Shrimpton, R. (1982) Aspectos Nutritivos de alguns peixes da Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 12(4): 787–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, K.P. & Fornerino, I. (1987) Hair mercury content among residents of Cumana, Venezuela. The Science of the Total Environment 63: 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SIBAN (1984) VII Simposio Brasileiro de Alimentacao e Nutricao. SIBAN, Brasilia, Brazil: 75 pp.Google Scholar
SIBAN (1987) VIII Simposio Brasileiro de Alimentacao e Nutricao. SIBAN, Brasilia, Brazil: 80 pp.Google Scholar
Silva, A.R.B., Guimaraes, G.A., Costa, M.Q. & Souza, T.M.C. (1989) A Contaminacao Mercurial nos garimpos de ouro na Amazonia. In: Anais do 30. Congressi Brasileiro de Defesa do Meio Ambiente, Rio de Janeiro 24–28 July 1989: 90 pp.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. & Miyama, T. (1975) Mercury in red blood cells in relation to organic mercury in hair. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 116: 379–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsubaki, T., Hirota, K., Shirakama, K., Kondo, K. & Sato, T. (1978) Clinical, epidemiologica! and toxicological studies on methyl mercury poisoning. In: Proceedings of the First International Congress on Toxicology, ed. Plaa, G.L. & Duncam, W.A.M., pp. 339–57. New York, London, San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tsubaki, T. & Irukayama, K., eds. (1977) Millantata disease. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers: 318 pp.Google Scholar
WHO (1976) Environmental Health Criteria I: Mcrcurv. WHO, Geneva: 131 pp.Google Scholar
WHO (1990) Environmental Health Criteria 101, Methylmercury. WHO, Geneva: 144 pp.Google Scholar