Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:46:25.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing international ‘problem’ species: why pan-European cormorant management is so difficult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

VIVIEN BEHRENS ,
FELIX RAUSCHMAYER  and
HEIDI WITTMER
VIVIEN BEHRENS*
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, PO Box 500 36, D-04301 Leipzig, Germany
FELIX RAUSCHMAYER
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, PO Box 500 36, D-04301 Leipzig, Germany
HEIDI WITTMER
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, PO Box 500 36, D-04301 Leipzig, Germany
*
*Correspondence: Ms Vivien Behrens Tel: +49 341 235 7745 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Stakeholder analysis as a specific tool in social science can be used to explain why environmental conflicts arise or persist and identify steps to resolve these. This paper considers the conflict over the great cormorant, a fish-foraging bird with a rapidly growing population, a conflict previously treated only at a local, subnational or national level. The measures taken have sometimes mitigated the conflict, but have not addressed the damage and conflicts owing to the rapid cormorant population expansion. As the population is mobile at the scale of Europe, management of the population needs to be considered at the European level. In the 1990s, the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) drew up a management plan, which was never endorsed. Interviews with authorities, scientists and other stakeholders revealed they considered the CMS management plan inappropriate because some thought it compromised national autonomy while others thought there was insufficient cormorant protection. A possible step-wise solution to developing a pan-European management plan is proposed, requiring agreement on common objectives and strategies.

Keywords

environmental conflictsenvironmental managementmulti-level governancespecies conservationstakeholder analysistransboundary conflicts
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 55 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. (2000) Adaptive management in transboundary protected areas: the Bialowieza National Park and Biosphere Reserve as a case study. Environmental Conservation 27 (4): 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, P.M. & Frank, K. (2005) One model, three species: first PVA for populations of European great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis), Baltic grey seals (Halichoeruns grypus balticus), and Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra). Report, UFZ-Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig-Halle, Germany.Google Scholar
Arlinghaus, R. (2006) Overcoming human obstacles to conservation of recreational fishery resources, with emphasis on Central Europe. Environmental Conservation 33 (1): 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2005) Great cormorant. BirdLife species factsheet [www document]. URL http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html?action=SpcHTMDetails.asp&sid=3679&m=0Google Scholar
Blackburn, J.W. & Bruce, W.M. (1995) Mediating Environmental Conflicts: Theory and Practice. Westport, USA: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Bregnballe, T., Engström, H., Knief, W., Van Eerden, M., Van Rijn, S., Kieckbusch, J.J. & Eskildsen, J. (2003) Development of the breeding population of great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis in the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Sweden during the 1990s. Vogelwelt 124 (Suppl.) Cormorants: Ecology and Management: 15–26.Google Scholar
Bruckmeier, K., Westerberg, H. & Varjopuro, R. (2008) Reconciliation in practice: the seal conflict and its mitigation in Sweden and Finland. In: Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Europe: Fisheries and Fish-eating Vertebrates as a Model Case, ed. Klenke, R., Ring, I., Kranz, A., Jepsen, N., Rauschmayer, F. & Henle, K. (jn press). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Burgess, G. & Burgess, H. (1995) Beyond the limits: dispute resolution of intractable environmental conflicts. In: Mediating Environmental Conflicts: Theory and Practice, ed. Blackburn, J.W. & Bruce, W.M., pp. 101–119. Westport, USA: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Carss, D. (2003) Reducing the conflict between cormorants and fisheries on a pan-European scale. REDCAFE, final report [www document]. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Banchory, UK. URL http://web.tiscali.it/cormorants/Redcafe/Redcafe_vol1_part1.pdfGoogle Scholar
CMS (1994) Recommendation 4.1: Conservation and management of cormorants in the African-Eurasian region, Conference of Parties, Fourth Meeting, Nairobi, Kenya [www document]. URL http://www.tematea.org/?q=node/765Google Scholar
CMS (1997) Recommendation 5.3: Development of an action plan for the great cormorant in the African-Eurasian region, Conference of Parties, Fifth Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland [www document]. URL http://www.cms.int/bodies/COP/cop5/cop5_documents_overview.htmGoogle Scholar
Daniels, S.E. & Walker, G.B. (2001) Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach. London, UK: Praeger.Google Scholar
EAA (2002) Meeting in European Parliament: five million European anglers call for action on cormorants [www document]. URL http://www.eaa-europe.org/sub/EP_Meeting-Cormorants-EN.htmGoogle Scholar
EC (2005) Environment: Commission takes legal action over breaches of environmental law in Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Press Release IP/05/34 [www document]. URL http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/34&type=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=enGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, M., Lebreton, J.-D. & Bregnballe, T. (2001) The interplay between culling and density-dependence in the great cormorant: a modelling approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrelts, H., Wittmer, H. & Birner, R. (2005) Policy windows for the declaration of protected areas: a comparative case study of East Germany and Guatemala. In: Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity. Interdisciplinary View on the Conservation of Biological Diversity, ed. Markussen, M., Buse, R., Garrelts, H., Mánez Costa, M.A., Menzel, S. & Marggraf, R., pp. 65–85. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimble, R. & Wellard, K. (1997) Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55 (2): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, A. (2007) Wer Vögel abschießt schützt keine Fische. [www document]. URL http://www.presseportal.de/pm/7154/1089031/mailGoogle Scholar
Hogl, K. (2002) Patterns of multi-level co-ordination for NFP-processes: learning from problems and success stories of European policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics 4 (4): 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergroup Sustainable Hunting, Biodiversity & Countryside Activities of the European Parliament (2007) Minutes of the meeting [www document]. URL http://www.face-europe.org/intergroup/minutes/minutes_ig%2023.05.07/minutes_ig%2023.05.07.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, N. & Olesen, T. (2008) Cormorants in Denmark: re-enforced management and scientific evidence. In: Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Europe. Fisheries and Fish-eating Vertebrates as a Model Case, ed. Klenke, R., Ring, I., Kranz, A., Jepsen, N., Rauschmayer, F. & Henle, K. (in press). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Keller, T. & Lanz, U. (2003) Great cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis management in Bavaria, southern Germany: what can we learn from seven winters with intensive shooting? Vogelwelt 124 (Suppl.) Cormorants: Ecology and Management: 339–348.Google Scholar
Keough, H.L. & Blahna, D.J. (2006) Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 20 (5): 1373–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klenke, R., Ring, I., Kranz, A., Jepsen, N., Rauschmayer, F. & Henle, K., eds (2008) Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Europe. Fisheries and Fish-eating Vertebrates as a Model Case (in press). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Lessard, R.B., Martell, S.J.D., Walters, C.J. & Essington, T.E. (2005) Should ecosystem management involve active control of species abundances? Ecology and Society 10 (2): 1 [www document]. URL www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, L. (2003) Recent development of the breeding and wintering population of great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo in France: preliminary results of the effects of a management plan of the species. Vogelwelt 124 (Suppl.) Cormorants: Ecology and Management: 35–39.Google Scholar
McDaniels, T., Longstaff, H. & Dowlatabadi, H. (2006) A value-based framework for risk management decisions involving multiple scales: a salmon aquaculture example. Environmental Science and Policy 9: 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, D.J., Byrd, K.L., Rutherford, M.B., Brown, S.R. & Clark, T.W. (2006) Finding common ground in large carnivore conservation: mapping contending perspectives. Environmental Science and Policy 9: 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijsberman, F. (1999) Conflict Management and Consensus Building for Integrated Coastal Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. Delft, the Netherlands: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Striegnitz, M. (2006) Conflicts over coastal protection in a national park: meditation and negotiated law making. Land Use Policy 23 (1): 26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thum, R. (2004) Rechtliche instrumente zur lösung von konflikten zwischen artenschutz und wirtschaftlicher nutzung natürlicher ressourcen durch den menschen am beispiel kormoranschutz and teichwirtschaft. Natur und Recht 9: 580–587.Google Scholar
Thum (2005) Zur rechtmäßigkeit so genannter kormoranverordnungen. Agrar- und Umweltrecht 35 (5): 148–152.Google Scholar
Togridou, A., Hovardas, T. & Pantis, J.D. (2006) Factors shaping implementation of protected area management decisions: a case study of the Zakynthos National Marine Park. Environmental Conservation 33 (3): 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonder, M. & Jurvelius, J. (2004) Attitudes towards fishery and conservation of the Saimaa ringed seal in Lake Pihlajavesi, Finland. Environmental Conservation 31 (2): 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service (2003) Final environmental impact statement: double-crested cormorant management in the United States [www document]. URL http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/issues/cormorant/cormorant.htmlGoogle Scholar
van Eerden, M. (2002) Managing cormorants in Western Europe: mission impossible? In: Der Kormoran (Phalacrocorax carbo) im Spannungsfeld zwischen Naturschutz und Teichbewirtschaftung, ed. Schönherr, C. & Ottenberg, S., pp. 7–13. Dresden, Germany: Sächsische Landestiftung Natur und Umwelt Akademie.Google Scholar
Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F. & Klauer, B. (2006) How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy 23 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, K.S., Galt, R.E. & Buck, M.V. (2004) Globalization and multi-spatial trends in the coverage of protected-area conservation (1980–2000). Ambio 33 (8): 520–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed