Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:41:15.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Looking back and looking ahead: local empowerment and governance in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

NABIN BARAL  and
MARC J. STERN
NABIN BARAL*
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
MARC J. STERN
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
*Correspondence: Nabin Baral Tel: +1 540 231 3596 Fax: +1 540 231 3698 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Diversifying governance models for protected areas serves as one strategy to address some of the challenges they are facing. This paper explores the potential of local communities to be the primary actor in the governance of the Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA) following its planned handover to them in 2012. In doing so, the paper serves as an important baseline from which to monitor a new experiment in protected area governance. During the summer of 2007, the executive members and implementing staff of the Conservation Area Management Committees (CAMCs) were interviewed and local villagers surveyed. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to assess the CAMCs’ capacities to manage ACA without outside support. All CAMCs had more than a decade of managerial experience and considerable local support. Villagers largely considered the CAMCs as legitimate institutions, and their executive members as trustworthy. CAMC members were confident about assuming management responsibility of the area. The devolution of power to an overarching local council to govern ACA will present some challenges, especially with regard to lower-performing CAMCs. However, key factors identified in the literature as critical to good governance portend positive prospects for the transition.

Keywords

Annapurnabiodiversity conservationcommunity-based conservationgovernanceNepalpark governanceprotected areas management
Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1)
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 1: Thematic section. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1) , March 2010 , pp. 54 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACAP (2001) Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA): Proposal for extension of ACA management. Report, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal: 76 pp.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A. & Hardin, R. (2008) Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320: 1460–1462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcorn, J.B., Luque, A. & Weisman, W. (2005) Non-governmental organizations and protected areas governance. In: Governance Stream of the Vth World Park Congress, ed. Ottawa, D. Pansky., Canada: Parks Canada and IUCN/WCPA.Google Scholar
Astolfi, B. (1995) How to involve women in protected areas. In: Expanding Partnership in Conservation, ed. McNeely, J.A., pp. 151–155. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bajracharya, S.B., Furley, P.A. & Netwon, A.C. (2005) Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 32: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, N. & Heinen, J.T. (2006) The Maoist People's War and conservation in Nepal. Politics and the Life Sciences 24: 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, N., Stern, M.J. & Heinen, J.T. (2007) Integrated conservation and development project life cycles in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: is development overpowering conservation? Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2903–2917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, N., Stern, M.J. & Bhattarai, R. (2008) Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics 66: 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, C.V., Miller, K.R. & Boness, M., eds (2004) Securing Protected Areas in the Face of Global Change: Issues and Strategies. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.B., Brandon, K., Gibson, C. & Gjertsen, H. (2001) Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. BioScience 51: 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, C.A., Sacayon, E. & Tzi, E. (2008) Protecting imperiled ‘paper parks’: potential lessons from the Sierra Chinaja, Guatemala. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 1581–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. & Tarnowski, C.B. (2005) Participatory democracy in natural resource management: a ‘Columbus's egg?’ In: Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-based Natural Resource Management, ed. Brosius, J.P., Tsing, A.L. & Zerner, C., pp. 69–90. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Johnston, J. & Pansky, D. (2006) Governance of protected areas. In: Protected Areas Management: a Global Guide, ed. Lockwood, M., Worboys, G.L. & Kothari, A., pp. 116–145. Virginia, USA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Brandon, K., Redford, K.H. & Sanderson, S.E. (1998) Parks in Peril: People, Politics, and Protected Areas. Washington, DC, USA: The Nature Conservancy and Island Press.Google Scholar
Brechin, S.R., Wilshusen, P.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West, P.C. (2002) Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosius, J.P. & Russell, D. (2003) Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17 (1/2): 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, B.W., Sherpa, M.N. & Wright, M. (1991) Annapurna Conservation Area: Nepal's new approach to protected area management. In: Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation, ed. West, P.C. & Brechin, S.R., pp. 160–172. Tucson, AZ, USA: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Child, B. & Dalal-Clayton, B. (2004) Transforming approaches to CBNRM: learning from the Luangwa experience in Zambia. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 256–289. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, P., Bennett, M. & Johnston, J. (2005) Trends in global protected area governance, 1992–2002. Environmental Management 36 (1): 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Dreu, C.K.W. & West, M.A. (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
del Valle, F.B.R. (2002) The national sanctuary Pampas del Heath: case study of a typical ‘paper park’ under management of an NGO. In: Making Parks Work: Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature, ed. Terborgh, J., vanSchaik, C., Davenport, L. & Rao, M., pp. 149–155. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Magome, H. & Turner, S., eds (2004) Rights, Resources and Rural Development: Community-based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Gearey, M. & Jeffrey, P. (2006) Concepts of legitimacy within the context of adaptive water management strategies. Ecological Economics 60: 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Amos, B. & Plumptre, T. (2003) Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century. Paper prepared for the Vth World Park Congress, Durban, South Africa, Institute of Governance, Ottawa, Canada [www document]. URL http://www.iog.ca/publications/PA_governance.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gurung, G.S. (2006) Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation Priorities with Livelihood Needs in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, Nepal. Schriftenreihe Humangeographie Human Geography Series, ed. Muller-Boker, U.. Zurich, Switzerland: Department of Geography, University of Zurich: 192 pp.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness. New York, USA: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinen, J.T. & Mehta, J.N. (2000) Emerging issues in legal and procedural aspects of buffer zone management with case studies from Nepal. Journal of Environment and Development 9: 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. & Courrau, J. (2006) Evaluating Effectiveness: a Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: 105 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, J. & Sherpa, M.N. (1989) Bottom-up versus basic needs: integrating conservation and development in the Annapurna and Michiru Mountain Conservation Areas of Nepal and Malawi. Ambio 18: 434–441.Google Scholar
Kothari, A. (2006) Community conserved areas. In: Protected Areas Management: a Global Guide, ed. Lockwood, M., Worboys, G.L. & Kothari, A., pp. 549–573. Virginia, USA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Leach, W.D. (2002) Surveying diverse stakeholder groups. Society and Natural Resources 15 (7): 641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Mwaguni, S., Muthiga, N.A. (2005) Management of the Kenyan coast. Ocean and Coastal Management 48: 901–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, J.A., ed. (1993) Parks for life: report of the 4th World Congress on national parks and protected areas. Report, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., eds (2004) Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, N.K. (2007) Our Forest, Your Ecosystem, Their Timber: Communities, Conservation, and the State in Community-based Forest Management. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press: 264 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, C.E. & Hull, R.W. (1996) Donor-initiated common pool resource institutions: the case of the Yanesha Forestry Cooperative. World Development 24: 1641–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphree, M.W. (1994) The role of institutions in community-based conservation. In: Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, ed. Wright, M. & Western, D., pp. 403–427. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, K.W., Northcraft, G.B. & Neale, M.A. (2006) Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: when does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9: 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkerton, E. & John, L. (2008) Creating local management legitimacy. Marine Policy 32: 680–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. & Ward, H. (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Development 29: 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, K.H. & Sanderson, S.E. (2000) Extracting humans from nature. Conservation Biology 14: 1362–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, J. & Wells, M.P. (2004) The pathology of projects. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 35–48. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlager, E. & Ostrom, E. (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68: 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A. & Nepstad, D. (2000) Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conservation Biology 14: 1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. (1997) Annapurna Conservation Area: empowerment, conservation, and development in Nepal. In: Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas, ed. Stevens, S., pp. 237–261. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Stern, M.J. (2008 a) Coercion, voluntary compliance, and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environmental Conservation 35 (3): 200–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, M.J. (2008 b) The power of trust: toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 21 (10): 859–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review 20: 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. (2000) The fate of tropical forests: a matter of stewardship. Conservation Biology 14: 1358–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J., vanSchaik, C., Davenport, L. & Rao, M., eds (2002) Making Parks Work: Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Viteri, C. & Chávez, C. (2007) Legitimacy, local participation, and compliance in the Galápagos Marine Reserve. Ocean and Coastal Management 50: 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.P. (1994) A profile and interim assessment of the Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal. In: Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. Wright, M. & Western, D., pp. 261–281. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Wells, M.P., Brandon, K. & Hannah, L. (1992) People And Parks: Linking Protected Area Management With Local Communities. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank: 99 pp.Google Scholar
Zaidi, S.A. (1999) NGO failure and the need to bring back the state. Journal of International Development 11: 259–271.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar