Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:21:04.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legislation for wetland conservation in Brazil: Are existing terms and definitions sufficient?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

LEONARDO MALTCHIK*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems, UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil
VANESSA CALEFFI
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems, UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil
CRISTINA STENERT
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems, UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil
DAROLD PAUL BATZER
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
MARIA TERESA FERNANDEZ PIEDADE
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Grupo MAUA, Manaus, Brazil
WOLFGANG JOHANNES JUNK
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Áreas Úmidas, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil
*
*Correspondence: Dr Leonardo Maltchik email: [email protected]

Summary

Laws are crucial tools to protect wetlands. How these laws are written has important implications for conservation. We assessed all wetland terms and definitions in Brazilian legislation to identify whether legislation uses any generic terms to represent several or all types of wetlands and to determine if definitions with clear descriptors exist that can easily be used to identify wetland systems. A total of 116 local wetland-related terms and 21 wetland definitions were found in Brazilian legislation. A direct Portuguese translation of the term ‘wetlands’ was found only once in the New Forest Code. The insertion of the term ‘wetlands’ in the New Forest Code has important practical implications for the conservation, since all different Brazilian wetland types would be represented by the generic term ‘wetlands’. The existence of a definition of the term ‘wetlands’ associated with attributes of water and biota in Federal legislation will help environmental technicians to identify wetland systems and to recognize different wetland types. The insertion of this definition in the New Forest Code would make it clear that the drainage of any wetland type – large or small – is prohibited, and those who do so would be breaking Brazilian environmental law.

Type
Report
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ACIESP (1997) Glossário de Ecologia. São Paulo, Brazil: Academia de Ciências do Estado de São Paulo, CNPq, FINEP, FAPESP, Secretaria da Ciência, Tecnologia e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico.Google Scholar
Chambers, P., Lacoul, P., Murphy, K.J. & Thomaz, S.M. (2008) Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 926.Google Scholar
Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C. & Laroe, E.T. (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, DC, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Services.Google Scholar
Ferreira, A.B.H. (2004) Novo Dicionário Aurélio da Língua Portuguesa. Curitiba, Brazil: Editora Positivo.Google Scholar
Junk, W.J., Piedade, M.T.F., Lourival, R., Wittmann, F., Kandus, P., Lacerda, L.D., Bozelli, R.L., Esteves, F.A., Nunes Da Cunha, C., Maltchik, L., Schöngart, J., Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. & Agostinho, A.A. (2014) Brazilian wetlands: Their definition, delineation, and classification for research, sustainable management, and protection. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24: 522.Google Scholar
Lewinsohn, T.M. & Prado, P.I. (2002) Biodiversidade Brasileira: Síntese do Estado Atual do Conhecimento. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Contexto.Google Scholar
Maltchik, L. (2003a) Three new wetlands inventories in Brazil. Interciencia 28: 421423.Google Scholar
Maltchik, L., Costa, E.S., Becker, C.G. & Oliveira, A.E. (2003b) Inventory of wetlands of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). Pesquisas Botânica 53: 89100.Google Scholar
Medauar, O. (2007) Direito Administrativo Moderno. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora RT- Revista dos Tribunais.Google Scholar
Medauar, O. (2015) Mini Código Administrativo. Coletânea de Legislação Administrativa. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora RT – Revista dos Tribunais.Google Scholar
Micallef, L. & Rodgers, P. (2014) eulerAPE: Drawing area-proportional 3-Venn Diagrams using ellipses. PLoS ONE 9: e101717.Google Scholar
Naranjo, L.G. (1995) An evaluation of the first inventory of South American wetlands. Vegetatio 118: 125129.Google Scholar
Paijmans, K., Galloway, R.W., Faith, D.P., Fleming, P.M., Haantjens, H.A., Heyligers, P.C., Kalma, J.D. & Loffler, E. (1985) Aspects of Australian Wetlands. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
US EPA (2017) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: How Wetlands are Defined and Identified [www document]. URL https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/section-404-clean-water-act-how-wetlands-are-defined-and-identifiedGoogle Scholar
Zoltai, S.C., Pollett, F.C., Jeglum, J.K. & Adams, G.D. (1975) Developing a wetland classification in Canada. In: Forest Soils and Forest Land Management, eds. Bernier, B. & Winget, C.H., pp. 497511. Laval, Canada: Proceedings of the Fourth North American Forest Soils Conference, Laval University.Google Scholar