Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:31:55.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information brokerage in Caribbean coral reef governance networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2020

Rachel A Turner Open the ORCID record for Rachel A Turner [Opens in a new window] ,
Johanna Forster ,
Angelie M Peterson ,
Robin Mahon  and
Clare Fitzsimmons
Rachel A Turner*
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES), University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados Environment and Sustainability Institute (ESI), University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK
Johanna Forster
Affiliation:
School of Natural & Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Angelie M Peterson
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES), University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados
Robin Mahon
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES), University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados
Clare Fitzsimmons
Affiliation:
School of Natural & Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Rachel A Turner, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Poor connectivity between diverse resource users and complex wider governance networks is a challenge in environmental governance. Organizations that ‘broker’ interactions among these relationships are expected to improve governance outcomes. Here, we used semi-structured interviews and social network analysis to identify actors in positions to broker coral reef-related information to and from resource users and to assess the performance of these brokers. Representatives (n = 262) of actor groups were interviewed, including local and national government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community organizations and resource user groups from 12 communities across four Caribbean countries, to map information-sharing networks and to identify brokers. Broker performance was assessed through separate interviews with coral reef resource users (n = 545). The findings show that marine NGOs were the highest-functioning brokers. Where such local-level organizations were absent, government agencies in reef management roles acted as brokers, but their performance was lower. Actors in brokerage positions did not always effectively share information, with broker performance being positively correlated with network brokerage scores. The results further our understanding of the roles of brokers in different governance contexts. Identifying those in brokerage positions and supporting their roles in connecting local resource users to wider governance networks could encourage functional brokerage and enhance reef management outcomes.

Keywords

brokerageCaribbeancoral reefsgovernanceinformation sharingnatural resource managementsocial network analysis
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 284 - 294
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, SM, Armitage, DR, Charles, A (2015) Social networks and transitions to co-management in Jamaican marine reserves and small-scale fisheries. Global Environmental Change 35: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angst, M, Widmer, A, Fischer, M, Ingold, K (2018) Connectors and coordinators in natural resource governance: insights from Swiss water supply. Ecology and Society 23(2): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, ML, Bodin, Ö, McClanahan, TR, Kittinger, JN, Hoey, AS, Gaoue, OG, Graham, NAJ (2019) Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs. Nature Communications 10(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berdej, SM & Armitage, DR (2016) Bridging organizations drive effective governance outcomes for conservation of Indonesia’s marine systems. PLoS ONE 11: e0147142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkes, F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702.Google ScholarPubMed
Berkes, F (2010) Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37: 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Ö, Crona, BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19: 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Ö, Crona, BI, Ernstson, H (2006) Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11: r2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Ö, Robins, G, McAllister, RRJ, Guerrero, A, Crona, B, Tengö, M, Lubell, M (2016) Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society 21(1): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, E (1973) A theory of middleman minorities. American Sociological Review 38: 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonstra, WJ (2016) Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecology and Society 21(1): 21.Google Scholar
Borgatti, SP, Carley, KM, Krackhardt, D (2006) On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks 28: 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, Y, Davy, B (2006) Analytical insights, lessons learnt, and recommendations. In: Breton, Y, Brown, D, Davy, B, Haughton, M, Ovares, L (eds), Coastal Management in the Wider Caribbean (pp. 223–254). Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publishers; and Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Butts, CT (2010) sna: Tools for Social Network Analysis [www document]. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sna/index.html Google Scholar
Carlsson, L, Berkes, F (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cash, DW, Adger, WN, Berkes, F, Garden, P, Lebel, L, Olsson, P et al. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinner, JE, McClanahan, TR, MacNeil, MA, Graham, NAJ, Daw, TM, Mukminin, A et al. (2012) Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 5219–5222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, PJ, Evans, LS, Mills, M (2012) Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conservation Letters 5: 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crona, BI, Parker, JN (2012) Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society 17: 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernstson, H, Sorlin, S, Elmqvist, T (2008) Social movements and ecosystem services – the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, MG, Valente, TW (2016) Bridging, brokerage and betweenness. Social Networks 44: 202–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folke, C, Hahn, T, Olsson, P, Norberg, J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J (2005) The R Commander: a basic statistics graphical user interface to R . Journal of Statistical Software 14: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelcich, S, Hughes, TP, Olsson, P, Folke, C, Defeo, O, Fernandez, M et al. (2010) Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 16794–16799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, MT (2008) Network governance in fisheries. Marine Policy 32: 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, RV, Fernandez, RM (1989) Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology 19: 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guston, DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values 26: 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, NL, Hilborn, R, Defeo, O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470: 386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, T, Olsson, P, Folke, C, Johansson, K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology 34: 573–592.Google Scholar
Hileman, J, Bastos, MTA, Lubell, M (2018) Robustness and the paradox of bridging organizations: the exit problem in regional water governance networks in Central America. Society & Natural Resources 31: 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horning, D, Bauer, BO, Cohen, SJ (2016) Missing bridges: social network (dis)connectivity in water governance. Utilities Policy 43: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, M (2009) Imputation of missing network data: some simple procedures. Journal of Social Structure 10: 1–29.Google Scholar
Jackson, J, Donovan, M, Cramer, K, Lam, V (2014) Status and trends of Caribbean coral reefs: 1970–2012 [www document]. URL https://www.iucn.org/content/status-and-trends-caribbean-coral-reefs-1970-2012 Google Scholar
Kooiman, J, Bavinck, M, Jentoft, S, Pullin, R (eds) (2005) Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Social Networks 9: 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D (2003) Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. In: Cross, R, Parker, A, Sasson, L (eds), Networks in the Knowledge Economy (pp. 324–336). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemos, MC, Agrawal, A (2006) Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, BE, Tirado, M, Butts, CT, Petrescu-Prahova, M (2008) Brokerage roles in disaster response: organisational mediation in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. International Journal of Emergency Management 5: 75–99.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: a framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 754–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackinson, S, Nøttestad, L (1998) Combining local and scientific knowledge. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8: 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, R, Fanning, L, McConney, P (2014) Assessing and facilitating emerging regional ocean governance arrangements in the Wider Caribbean Region. In: Coffen-Smout, A Chircop S, McConnell, ML (eds), Ocean Yearbook 28 (pp. 631–671). Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google Scholar
Mahon, R, McConney, P (2004) Managing the managers: improving the structure and operation of small fisheries departments, especially in SIDS. Ocean and Coastal Management 47: 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, R, McConney, P (2011) The national fisheries department and small-scale fisheries management: ‘fit for purpose?’. In: Cheunpagdee, R (ed.), World Small-Scale Fisheries Contemporary Visions (pp. 261–272). Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Marín, A, Berkes, F (2010) Network approach for understanding small-scale fisheries governance: the case of the Chilean coastal co-management system. Marine Policy 34: 851–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, TR, Cinner, JE, Kamukuru, AT, Abunge, CA, Ndagala, J (2008) Management preferences, perceived benefits and conflicts among resource users and managers in the Mafia Island Marine Park, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 35: 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newig, J, Fritsch, O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E (2008) Frameworks and theories of environmental change. Global Environmental Change 18: 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, R, Armitage, DR, de Loë, RC (2013) Adaptive comanagement and its relationship to environmental governance. Ecology and Society 18: 21.Google Scholar
Prager, K (2010) Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: the challenge of bridging institutional levels. Environmental Management 46: 711–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provan, KG, Kenis, P (2008) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ramirez-Sanchez, S (2011) Who and how: engaging well-connected fishers in social networks to improve fisheries management and conservation. In: Bodin, Ö, Prell, C (eds), Social Networks and Natural Resource Management (pp. 119–146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathwell, KJ, Peterson, GD (2012) Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecology and Society 17: 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddle, K, Davis, A (2013) Marine policy. Marine Policy 39: 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, A, Crona, BI, Bodin, Ö (2013) Legitimacy in co-management: the impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance 24: 60–76.Google Scholar
Spiro, ES, Acton, RM, Butts, CT (2013) Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Social Networks 35(1): 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovel, K, Golub, B, Meyersson Milgrom, EM (2011) Stabilizing brokerage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 21326–21332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stovel, K, Shaw, L (2012) Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, RA, Fitzsimmons, C, Forster, J, Mahon, R, Peterson, A, Stead, SM (2014) Measuring good governance for complex ecosystems: perceptions of coral reef-dependent communities in the Caribbean. Global Environmental Change 29: 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valente, TW, Fujimoto, K (2010) Bridging: locating critical connectors in a network. Social Networks 32: 212–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vignola, R, McDaniels, TL, Scholz, RW (2013) Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environmental Science and Policy 31: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S, Faust, K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, K, Hamann, M, Kinney, M, Marsh, H (2012) Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Global Environmental Change 22: 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Turner et al. supplementary material

Figure S1 and Tables S1-S2

Download Turner et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 815.7 KB