Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:27:46.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industrial Development and Wildlife Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John G. Kelcey
Affiliation:
Field Ecologist, Milton Keynes Development Corporation, Wavendon Tower, Wavendon, Milton Keynes, England.

Extract

The general situation concerning the contribution that industrial development has made to the conservation of wildlife in Britain is reviewed. Two major types of site have been identified, namely discrete and linear, each being divided into a number of categories, with further subdivisions depending upon the nature of the site: for example, used or disused (canals, railways, etc.) or wet or dry (gravel pits, clay pits, etc.).

The wildlife value of a representative sample of sites of each type is described qualitatively. It is argued that industrial development produces areas which are often richer in wildlife than much of the remaining rural or urban environment. This results from the existence of ‘wilderness areas’ within industrial complexes, from the creation of new habitats, from the passage of time, and from the protection given against public access and against intensive agricultural, forestry, and landscape, management. The linear systems are seen as forming a network of ‘wildlife corridors’ linking together discrete sites, thus providing reservoirs for the colonization of new habitats and enabling wildlife to survive in close proximity to intensively used urban and rural land. Many ‘industrial sites’ provide facilities for field studies, environmental trails, and environmental education, as well as forming the basis of country or linear parks. They also enable many rare species to survive, and probably prevent many of the common species from becoming less frequent.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1969). Nature Reserves—Where to see Wildlife in Berks., Bucks, and Oxon. Berks., Bucks, and Oxon Naturalists' Trust, The Lea, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, England: 16 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Anon. (1973). County Review-Nature Conservation Aspect Report (draft). Bedfordshire County Council, Bedford, England: 73 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Bell, T. H. (1962). Birds of Cheshire. John Sherratt, Altrincham: xii + 240 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bugler, J. (1972). Polluting Britain. Pelican Books, London: 182 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cheshire Bird Reports (19651970). Cheshire Ornithological Association, Dods Marsh, Prestbury, Cheshire, England: pp. 2532, illustr.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. R. (1969). Flora of Derbyshire. County Borough of Derby, England: viii + 382 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dony, J. (1953). Flora of Bedfordshire. Corporation of Luton, England: 532 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dony, J. (1967). Flora of Hertfordshire. Hitchin Urban District Council, England: 112 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1974 a). Ecological Studies in Milton Keynes, IV—The Brickfields. Milton Keynes Development Corporation, Wavendon, Milton Keynes, England: 32 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1974 b). Ecological Studies in Milton Keynes, II —Road Verges (Other Than Grid Roads). Milton Keynes Development Corporation, Wavendon, Milton Keynes: 22 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1974 c). Ecological Studies in Milton Keynes, III —Grid Roads. Milton Keynes Development Corporation, Wavendon Tower, Wavendon, Milton Keynes: 30 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Messenger, K. G. (1968). A railway flora of Rutland. Proc.BSBI, 7(3), pp. 325–44.Google Scholar
Moore, N. W. (1967). Nature Conservation and Roadside Verges. Paper presented to Conference on ‘Roads in the Landscape’, July 1967. Ministry of Transport and British Roads Federation: 6 pp.Google Scholar
Newton, A. (1971). Flora of Cheshire. Cheshire Community Council, Chester, England: 258 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Perring, F. H. (1967). Verges are vital—a botanist looks at our roadsides. J. Inst. High. Engin., 14(12), pp. 13–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Perring, F. H. (1969). The botanical importance of roadside verges. Pp. 814 in Way, 1969 (q.v.).Google Scholar
Patterson, H. (1973). Biological Survey of Freshwater Bodies in Milton Keynes Designated Area. Milton Keynes Development Corporation, Wavendon, Milton Keynes: 31 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Schofield, J. M. (1969). Management Plan for Pringle Wood Cutting Nature Reserve. Bedfordshire and Huntingdonshire Naturalists' Trust, 23 St. Cuthbert's Street, Bedford: 5 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Streeter, D. (1969). Road verges—a local responsibility for conservation. Pp. 15–9 in Way, 1969 (q.v.).Google Scholar
Twigg, H. M. (1959). Freshwater studies in the Shropshire Union Canal. Field Studies, 1(1), pp. 116–42, illustr.Google Scholar
Walker, T. G. (1969). The birds of Anglesey. Pp. 165–203 in Natural History of Anglesey (Ed. Jones, W. Eifon). Anglesey Antiquarian Society, Anglesey, Wales: 268 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Way, J. M. (Ed.) (1969). Road Verges—Their Function and Management (Proc. Symposium, London, 1969). Monks Wood Experimental Station, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon: 93 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Way, J. M. (1970). Roads and the conservation of wildlife. J.Inst.High.Eng., 17(7), pp. 28, illustr.Google Scholar