Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:20:06.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government involvement in environmental technology development: a critical analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Marc E. Norman
Marc E. Norman*
Affiliation:
Center for Energy and the Environment, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
*
* Dr Marc E. Norman, Institute for Policy Studies, 1601 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009, USA Tel: +1 202 232 1032 Fax: +1 202 387 7915 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper analyzes the justifications for governmental involvement in the development and commercialization of environmental technologies. To do so, a list of ‘generic’ rationales for government R&D involvement is extracted from various literature sources. Each rationale is discussed theoretically, and then analyzed in terms of its possible application to the environmental field. The intended contribution of the paper is to provide a theoretical background concerning the proper role of government in the development of environmental technologies. By determining the circumstances under which government involvement is justified, the groundwork is laid for the development of appropriate governmental policies.

The paper argues that there are several salient features of the environmental field which may justify governmental involvement. The increasingly high degree of environmental regulation has already caused indirect market failures that hinder private R&D efforts. Potential technologies to counter environmental externalities represent public goods which have social benefits for which there are no incentives in the private market. Uncertainty due both to our lack of understanding of the complexities of the natural environment and to shifting environmental regulations and policies may cause a risk aversion in the private sector against developing technologies. Imperfect public knowledge concerning environmental issues leads to less than optimal demand for new environmental technologies. All of these features generate market distortions which cause private R&D to deviate from what is socially optimal. As a result, governmental involvement in environmental technology development may well be warranted.

Keywords

environmenttechnologyR&Dresearchgovernmentexternalities
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 111 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eads, G. (1974) U.S. Government support for civilian technology: economic theory versus political practice. Research Policy 3: 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, W. (1988) Federally supported commercial technology development: solar thermal technologies 1970–1982. Research Policy 17(1): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffen, J.M. & Steele, H.B. (1986) Energy Economics and Policy. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: p. 42.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.R. (1983) Government support of technical progress: lessons from history. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2(4): 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, W. (1990) Intermediate Microeconomics and its Application. Chicago: The Dryden Press: p. 611.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.S. (1981) Energy, productivity, and the new industrial policy. In: Toward a New Industrial Policy, ed. Wachter, M.L. & wachter, S.M., pp. 176–201. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalensee, R. (1980) Appropriate government policy toward commercialization of new energy technologies. Energy Journal 1: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, R.J. (1989) An analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy's civilian R&D budget. Energy Journal 10(1): 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilton, J.E. (1976) The public role in energy research and development. In: Energy Supply and Government Policy, pp. 103–9. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar