Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:27:34.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framing justice in REDD+ governance: centring transparency, equity and legitimacy in readiness implementation in West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

USMAN ISYAKU ,
ALBERT A. ARHIN  and
ADENIYI P. ASIYANBI
USMAN ISYAKU
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Department of Geography, Leicester, UK Ahmadu Bello University, Department of Geography, Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria
ALBERT A. ARHIN*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Department of Geography, Cambridge, UK
ADENIYI P. ASIYANBI
Affiliation:
Kings College London, Department of Geography, London, UK
*
*Correspondence: Albert A. Arhin e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper investigates the dimensions of justice in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation plus enhancement of forest carbon stock (REDD+) in West Africa. By paying explicit attention to transparency, equity and legitimacy (TEL) in Nigeria and Ghana, the paper examines justice considerations in REDD+ implementation with a focus on tenure. We draw on analysis of policy documents and interviews with stakeholders in both countries. Our results show that commitment to the pursuit of justice in both cases is limited when examined through the elements of TEL. Efforts to recognize the tenure rights of indigenous peoples, effective representation in decision making and transparent disclosure of information to all stakeholders were limited in Ghana by the tacit evasion of tenure ambiguities, especially in the migrant-dominated REDD+ pilot areas. In Nigeria, such limits were shown in a similar evasion and in the strategic orchestration of tenure complexities evident in the changing local forest access under a protectionist regime. We argue that explicit attention to TEL as mediating dimensions of the normative elements of justice provides important insights into how environmental policy instruments such as REDD+ might both enable and disable justice for local people living around project sites.

Keywords

REDD+justiceenvironmental governanceGhanaNigeriaWest Africa
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 212 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306 (5699): 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arhin, A.A. (2014) Safeguards and dangerguards: a framework for unpacking the black box of safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 45: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arhin, A.A. (2015) Halting deforestation to advance sustainable development: progress, prospects and challenges of REDD+ readiness in Ghana. In: Sustainable Development: Processes, Challenges and Prospects, ed. Reyes, D., pp. 39–64. New York, NY: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Asiyanbi, A.P. (2015) Mind the gap: global truths, local complexities in emergent green initiatives. In: The International Handbook of Political Ecology, ed. Bryant, R. L., pp. 274–287. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Asiyanbi, A.P (2016) A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River. Geoforum 77: 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, B.L. (2009) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Beymer-Farris, B.A. & Bassett, T.J. (2012) The REDD menace: resurgent protectionism in Tanzania's mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22 (2): 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, A. & Tassa, D.T. (2012) Exploring climate justice for forest communities engaging in REDD+: experiences from Tanzania. Forum for Development Studies 39 (1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castree, N. (2008) Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations. Environment and Planning A 40 (1): 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, C.J., Vedeld, P.O. & Trædal, L.T. (2015) Securitizing REDD? Problematizing the emerging illegal timber trade and forest carbon interface in East Africa. Geoforum 60: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Corbin, J.M. & Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross River State Forestry Commission (2011) National Programme Document. Calabar, Nigeria: Cross River State Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Duffy, R. (2016) War, by conservation. Geoforum 69: 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. (2013) Justice implications of conditionality in payments for ecosystem services. In: The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services, ed. Sikor, T., pp. 21–45. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forsyth, T. & Sikor, T. (2013) Forests, development and the globalisation of justice. Geographical Journal 179 (2): 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2009) Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ghana Forestry Commission (2015) Ghana National REDD+ Strategy. Accra, Ghana: The Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., (2008) Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 8 (2): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ite, U.E. (2001) Global Thinking and Local Action. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Larson, A.M., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Duchelle, A., Babon, A., Dokken, T., Pham, T.T., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Selaya, G., Awono, A. & Huynh, T.-B. (2013) Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. Global Environmental Change 23 (3): 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M. & Scoones, I. (2015) Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M.F., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A. & Sunderlin, W.D. (2013) Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecology and Society 18 (4): 52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahanty, S. & McDermott, C.L. (2013) How does ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD+. Land Use Policy 35: 406–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeler, R.A., Mittermeler, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 (6772): 853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nel, A. (2016) Social equity in Ugandan carbon forestry. In: The Carbon Fix: Forest Carbon, Social Justice, and Environmental Governance, eds. Paladino, S. & Fiske, S.J., pp. 302–315. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumann, R.P. (2000) Land, justice, and the politics of conservation in Tanzania. In: People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation, ed. Zerner, C., pp. 117–133. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NFP (2006) National Forest Policy, 2006. The Federal Ministry of Environment Abuja [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/forestry/15148-0c4acebeb8e7e45af360ec63fcc4c1678.pdf Google Scholar
Nuesiri, E.O. (2015) Representation in REDD: NGOs and Chiefs Privileged Over Elected Local Government in Cross River State. Responsive Forest Governance Initiative Working Paper No 11. Dakar, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA).Google Scholar
Oyebo, M., Bisong, F. & Morakinyo, T. (2010) A Preliminary Assessment of the Context for REDD in Nigeria. Calabar, Nigeria: Cross River State Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K. & Brown, J. (2011) Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Environmental Science & Policy 14: 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, J., Webb, E.L. & Agrawal, A. (2010) Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328: 312–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R-PP (2013) REDD+ Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP) of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [www document]. URL https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/nigeria Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2007) Defining Environmental Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoneveld, G.C. (2014) The politics of the forest frontier: negotiating between conservation, development, and indigenous rights in Cross River State, Nigeria. Land Use Policy 38: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, H. & McDermott, C. (2014) Beyond carbon: enabling justice and equity in REDD+ across levels of governance. Ecology and Society 19 (1): 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikor, T. (2013) The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spergel, B. & Wells, M. (2009) Conservation trust funds as a model for REDD+ national financing. In: Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, ed. Angelsen, A., pp. 75–84. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Suiseeya, K.R.M. & Kimberly, R. (2015) A retreat from justice in global forest governance: REDD+ and the ‘do no harm’ principle. Presented at: 3rd Annual UCSB Environmental Politics Conference, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 5 June 2015.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., Duchelle, A.E., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Huynh, T.B., Awono, A. & Dokken, T. (2014) How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Development 55: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teye, J.K. (2008) Forest resource management in Ghana: an analysis of policy and institutions. Doctoral dissertation. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
World Bank (2013) Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Readiness Mechanism, Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP) External Review: Review of R-PP of Nigeria. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar