Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:17:49.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environment and Development: Attitudinal Impediments to Policy Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Robert J.P. Gale
Robert J.P. Gale
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Attitudes towards the concept of sustainable development—an approach to development which integrates economic, social, and environmental, considerations in development planning and decision-making—are evaluated according to six sectors of public interest: the private sector, the general public, government, the academic and research sector, labour, and the voluntary sector.

The study is empirical. Attitudinal data are gathered from a content analysis of public briefs submitted in 1983 and 1984 to the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. For each sector, attitudes towards development planning are assessed, with particular attention given to attitudes affecting the integration of economic and environmental considerations in development planning.

The study shows that a commitment to private-sector views is strongly, although negatively, related to environmental concern. Private-sector interventions are not only the least sympathetic of all six sectors towards the integration of economic and environmental policies, but the majority of interveners in this sector are opposed to the very concept. Given this, there are major attitudinal obstacles to the acceptance of the concept beyond the rhetorical level.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1991 , pp. 228 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, K.D. (1987). Methods of Social Research, 3rd edn.The Free Press, New York, NY, USA: 533 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), pp. 101–10, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P.M. & Rapport, D.J. (1986). State of the Environment Report for Canada. Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OS9, Canada: x + 263 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bowman, J.S. (1977 a). Attitudes and orientations of environmentally-concerned citizens. Environmental Conservation, 4(4), pp. 259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J.S. (1977 b). Public opinion and the environment: post-Earth Day attitudes among college students. Environment and Behaviour, 9(3), pp. 385–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruvold, W.H. (1973). Belief and behavior as determinants of environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 5(2), pp. 202–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, I. (1971). The social role of attitude and perception studies. Pp. 1–6 in Perceptions and Attitudes in Resources Management (Eds Sewell, W.R.D. & Burton, I.). Information Canada, Ottawa, Ontario; Canada: viii + 147 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Buttel, F.H. & Flinn, W.L. (1974). The structure of support for the environmental movement, 1968–1970. Rural Sociology, 93(1), pp. 56–69.Google Scholar
Clark, W.C. (1986). Sustainable development of the biosphere: themes for a research program. Pp. 5–49 in Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (Eds Clark, W.C. & Munn, R.E.). IIASA, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: vi + 491 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cocklin, C.R. (1989). Methodological problems in evaluating sustainability. Environmental Conservation, 16(4), pp. 343–51, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantini, E. & Hanf, K. (1972). Environmental concern at Lake Tahoe: a study of elite perceptions, backgrounds, and attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 4(2), pp. 209–42.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology — the ‘issueattention’ cycle. Public Interest, 28, pp. 38–50.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7(4), pp. 428–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J.E. (1987). Initial Review of Environmental Assessment and Related Processes in Support of Sustainable Development: a Discussion Paper. Report to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council (CEARC), Ottawa, Ontario K1A OH3, Canada: 26 pp.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.E. & Roseland, M. (1989 a). Thinking globally: the role of social equity in sustainable development. Alternatives, 16(3), pp. 26–34.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.E. & Roseland, M. (1989 b). Acting locally: community strategies for equitable sustainable development. Alternatives, 16(3), pp. 36–48.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P., Gardner, J. & Munro, D.A. (1987). Sustainable and equitable development: an emerging paradigm. Pp. 17–29 in Conservation with Equity, Proceedings of the Conference on Conservation and Development: Implementing the World Conservation Strategy, Ottawa, Canada, 31 May–5 June 1986 (Eds Jacobs, P. & Munro, D.A.). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, England, UK: xvii + 466 pp.Google Scholar
Milbrath, L.W. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, NY, USA: xv + 180 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1989). Geography and Resource Analysis, 2nd edn.Longman Scientific and Technical, London, England, UK: xvii + 386 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nelson, J.G. & Eidsvik, H.E. (1990). Sustainable development, conservation strategies, and heritage: three basic tools for influencing the global future. Alternatives, 16(4) / 17(1), pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (1971). Perspectives on Resource Management. Pion, London, England, UK: 183 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (1981). Environmentalism. Pion, London, England, UK: 409 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rees, W.E. (1988). A role for environmental assessment in achieving sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 8(4), pp. 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Methuen, London, England, UK: 221 pp.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada (cited as ‘Royal Commission’ (1985). Final Report. Supply & Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario: K1A OS9, Canada: 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Sewell, W.R.D. (1971). Integrating public views in planning and policy-making. Pp. 125–31 in Perceptions and Attitudes in Resources Management (Eds Sewell, W.R.D. & Burton, I.). Information Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: viii + 147 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (1989). Sustainable development: Theoretical construct or attainable goal. Environmental Conservation, 16(1), pp. 41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognacci, L.N., Wigel, R.H., Wideen, M.F. & Vernon, D.T.A. (1972). Environmental quality: how universal is public concern? Environment and Behavior, 4, pp. 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development [cited as WCED] (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xv + 400 pp.Google Scholar