Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:39:54.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecological and Social Evaluation of Industrial Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Pauline K. Marstrand
Affiliation:
Senior Fellow, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, England.

Extract

The development of methods for evaluation of industrial development by investigation of its ecological and health, as well as its social and economic, effects was the aim of UNEP/UNIDO Project EP/INT/73-002. Following six weeks' study of the cotton textile industry in Thailand, recommendations were made regarding criteria, team composition, and methods of utilizing existing information and conducting interviews. Interviews with village people and farmers were found to be a feasible method for qualitative assessment of environmental effects, and for providing information on which losses could be estimated. In all cases the costs of prevention or mitigation of damage were small in comparison with estimated costs of the damage caused.

The paper suggest that developing countries have the opportunity to industrialize without the trauma of extensive damage to health or environment, and that such development is not intrinsically more costly than other types in financial terms. It does, however, demand better understanding of the social, economic, and environmental, characters of a locality before planning begins. In many countries, including Thailand, existing university and other resources, assisted by interviews with the communities concerned, can provide the information required for this understanding, and therefore the delay need not be great.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

F.A.O. (1968). The State of World Food and Agriculture 1967. F.A.O., Rome: ix + 196 pp.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Harvey P. (1973). Water Pollution Control in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Report of NCR/USOM, January.Google Scholar
Mckerron, G. S. & Marstrand, P. K. (in prep.). Risk Assessment from Cost Effectiveness Studies.Google Scholar
Pendleton, R. L. & Kingsbury, R. C. (1962). Thailand: Aspects of Landscape and Life. American Geographical Society Handbook, New York: ca 600 pp.Google Scholar
Pescod, M. B. (1973). Investigations of National Ejfluent and Stress Standards for Tropical Countries. Interim Research Report, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Ratasuk, Sermpol (1971). Chao Phya River: Pollution Survey and Economic Study of Pollution Control. Applied Scientific Research Corporation of Thailand, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Ratasuk, Sermpol (1972). Water Pollution in Thailand. Applied Scientific Research Corporation of Thailand, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Sinclair, C. (1972). The Cost Effectiveness of Industrial Safety. HMSO, London: 60 pp.Google Scholar
Sinclair, C., Marstrand, P. K. & Newick, P. M. (1972). Innovation and Human Risk. Centre for the Study of Industrial Innovation, Guildford, England: 36 pp., illustr.Google Scholar