Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:59:54.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation Education Programmes: Evaluate and Improve Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Susan K. Jacobson
Susan K. Jacobson
Affiliation:
Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Evaluation of the conservation education programme at Kinabalu Park in Malaysia demonstrated the importance of such evaluation in determining a programme's worth and providing due observation of feedback and opportunity for improvement. The goal of the programme was to foster more favourable attitudes towards the park system and the conservation of natural resources than formerly prevailed among local villagers. The programme was formally evaluated by using a survey instrument in the form of a mobile unit's questionnaire that had been designed to obtain information about shifts in villagers' attitudes towards the Park before and after exposure to the conservation programme.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1987 , pp. 201 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, D.B. (1974). Evaluating environmental education programs. Pp. 113–64 in Environmental Education, Strategies Toward a More Livable Future (Eds Swan, J.A. & Stapp, W.B.). Halsted Press, New York, NY, USA: 349 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. (1982). Conservation on wheels. Pp. 87–9 in Environmental Education in Action—V: International Case Studies in Environmental Education (Eds Cowan, M.E. & Stapp, W.B.). ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA: xix + 308 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Burrough, J.B. (1978). Cabbages, conservation and copper. Pp. 75–90 in Kinabalu Summit of Borneo (Eds Luping, M., Chin, W. & Dingley, E.R.). Sabah Society Monograph, Sabah, Malaysia: 482 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Chenery, M.F. & Hammerman, W. (1984). Current practice in the evaluation of resident outdoor education programs: report of a national survey. J. Environmental Education, 16(2), pp. 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S.K. (1985). Kinabalu Park. Sabah Parks Publication No. 7, P.O. Box 10626, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia: 66 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S.K. (in press). Resident attitudes about a national park and conservation in Sabah, Malaysia. In Resident Populations and National Parks in Developing Nations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Policy Implications (Eds P.C. West & S. Brechin). Natural Resource Sociology Monograph No. 4, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
Nowak, P.F. (1984). Direct evaluation: a management tool for program justification, evolution, and modification. J. Environmental Education, 15(4), pp. 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passineau, J.P. (1975). Walking the ‘tightrope’ of environmental education evaluation. Pp. 371–414 in What Makes Education Environmental (Eds McInnes, N. & Albrecht, D.). Environmental Educators Inc. and Data Courier Inc., Louisville, Kentucky, USA: xv + 470 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sario, I.H. & Liew, T.C. (1980). Basis for future forest management in Sabah. Sabah Forest Management Seminar, October 1980, unpub.: Quoted in Davies, C. & Payne, J. (1982). A Faunal Survey of Sabah. IUCN/WWF Project No. 1692, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: vii + 279 pp., illustr.Google Scholar