Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:20:26.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coffee monoculture trends in tropical agroforested landscapes of Western Ghats (India)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

CÉDRIC GAUCHEREL ,
JULIE ALET  and
CLAUDE GARCIA
CÉDRIC GAUCHEREL*
Affiliation:
French Institute of Pondicherry, IFP – CNRS, Pondicherry, India UMR AMAP – INRA, Montpellier, France
JULIE ALET
Affiliation:
French Institute of Pondicherry, IFP – CNRS, Pondicherry, India
CLAUDE GARCIA
Affiliation:
CIRAD, Goods and Services of Tropical Forest Ecosystems Research Unit, F-34398 Montpellier, France ETH Zurich, Forest Management and Development Group (ForDev), Department of Environmental Systems Science, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Correspondence: Dr. Cédric Gaucherel Tel: 33 (0) 4 67 61 65 86 Fax: 33 (0) 4 67 61 56 68 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Against the backdrop of the competing demands of agricultural productivity and biodiversity conservation, understanding land-use changes is critical. We studied the past, current and future landscape–dynamic scenarios for coffee and rice-coupled crops at a village scale in the Western Ghats (southern India) by integrating three levels of organization (patch, farm and soils). The village structures and dynamics from 1950 to 2010 were modelled with the Dynamic Patch Landscape (DYPAL) modelling platform and analysed with Comparison Map Profile (CMP) spatial analysis in order to assess environmental trends. Our model, combined with mathematical formalizations and multiscale analyses, was also used to project future land-use sustainability. Our findings highlight significant environmental issues affecting the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, which is also subject to increasing and differential demands for other crops that are dependent on farm production systems. Intensive coffee cultivation, with conversion of the forest cover into Grevillea robusta monoculture and ongoing paddy abandonment, have had a strong impact on the region's landscape (+30% G. robusta) and biodiversity (from –3% to –13% in the already-reduced forest cover).

Keywords

coffee agroforestsDYPAL modelling platformKodagu district (India)land cover and land-use changeCMP spatial comparison analysisrice paddy conversionbiodiversity erosion
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 183 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambinakudige, S. & Choi, J. (2009) Global coffee market influence on land-use and land-cover change in the Western Ghats of India. Land Degradation and Development 20: 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babin, N. (2015) The coffee crisis, fair trade, and agroecological transformation: impacts on land-use change in Costa Rica. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 39: 99–129.Google Scholar
Baker, W. L. (1989) A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecology 2: 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. L., Egbert, S. L. & Frazier, G. F. (1991) A spatial model for studying the effects of climatic change on the structure of landscapes subject to large disturbances. Ecological Modelling 56: 109–125.Google Scholar
Bidogeza, J. C., Berentsen, P. B. M., Graaff, J. & Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2009) A typology of farm households for the Umutara Province in Rwanda. Food Security 1: 321–335.Google Scholar
Bierschenk, T. & Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. O. (1997) ECRIS: Rapid collective inquiry for the identification of conflicts and strategic groups. Human Organization 56: 238–244.Google Scholar
Burel, F. & Baudry, J. (2003) Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Castellazzi, M. S., Matthews, G. A., Wood, P. J., Burgess, K., Conrad, F. & Perry, J. N. (2007) Software for spatio-temporal allocation of crops to fields. In: Proceedings of 5th Annual Conference of the European Federation of IT in Agriculture, pp. 1881–1889. Glasgow, UK: LandSFACTS.Google Scholar
Costanza, R. & Voinov, A. (2003) Landscape Simulation Modeling: A Spatially Explicit, Dynamic Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
De Beenhouwer, M., Aerts, R. & Honnay, O. (2013) A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry. Agricultural Ecosystem Environment 175: 1–7.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. A., Baerenklau, K. A., Marcos-Martinez, R. & Chavez, E. (2010) Land use/land cover change dynamics and drivers in a low-grade marginal coffee growing region of Veracruz, Mexico. Agroforestry Systems 80: 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O'Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D. & Zaks, D. P. M. (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478: 337–342.Google Scholar
Garcia, C., Shonil, A., Bhagwat, A., Ghazoul, J., Cheryl, D. N., Nanaya, K. M., Chepudira, G., Kushalappa, Y. R., Nasi, R. & Vaast, P. (2010) Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: challenges and opportunities of coffee agroforests in the Western Ghats, India. Conservation Biology 24: 479–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, C. A., Marie-Vivien, D., Kushalappa, C. G., Chengappa, P. G. & Nanaya, K. M. (2007) Geographical indications and biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. Mountain Research and Development 27: 206–210.Google Scholar
Gaucherel, C. (2007) Multiscale heterogeneity map and associated scaling profile for landscape analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 82: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaucherel, C., Alleaume, S. & Hely, C. (2008) The comparison map profile method: a strategy for multiscale comparison of quantitative and qualitative images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46: 2708–2719.Google Scholar
Gaucherel, C., Boudon, F., Houet, T., Castets, M. & Godin, C. (2012) Understanding patchy landscape dynamics: towards a landscape language. PLoS One 7: e46064.Google Scholar
Gaucherel, C., Griffon, S., Misson, L. & Houet, T. (2010) Combining process-based models for future biomass assessment at landscape scale. Landscape Ecology 25: 201–215.Google Scholar
Gaucherel, C. & Houet, T. (2009) Preface to the selected papers on spatially explicit landscape modelling: current practices and challenges. Ecological Modelling 220: 3477–3480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M. & Toulmin, C. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houet, T., Loveland, T. R., Hubert-Moy, L., Gaucherel, C., Napton, D., Barnes, C. A. & Sayler, K. (2009) Exploring subtle land use and land cover changes: a framework for future landscape studies. Landscape Ecology 25: 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houet, T., Schaller, N., Castets, M. & Gaucherel, C. (2014) Improving the simulation of fine-resolution landscape changes by coupling top-down and bottom-up land use and cover change rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28: 1848–1876.Google Scholar
Hylander, K., Nemomissa, S., Delrue, J. & Enkosa, W. (2013) Effects of coffee management on deforestation rates and forest integrity. Conservation Biology 27: 1031–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, S., Bacon, C. M., Philpott, S. M., Mendez, V. E., Läderarch, P. & Rice, R. A. (2014) Shade coffee: update on a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 64: 416–428.Google Scholar
Kushalappa, C. G., Raghuramulu, Y., Garcia, C. & Vaast, P. (2011) CAFNET India Final Report. Bangalore, India: College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Leach, M., Mearns, R. & Scoones, I. (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27: 225–247.Google Scholar
Leroy, M., Garcia, C., Aubert, P.-M., Bernard, C., Brams, J., Caron, C., Junker, C., Payet, G., Rigal, C. & Thevenet, S. (2011) Thinking the Future: Coffee, Forest and People – Conservation and Development in Kodagu. Advanced Master “Forêt Nature Société”. Montpellier, France: AgroParisTech.Google Scholar
Mladenoff, D. J. & Baker, W. L. (1999) Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nath, C., Pélissier, R., Ramesh, B. R. & Garcia, C. (2011) Promoting native trees in shade coffee plantations of southern India: comparison of growth rates with the exotic Grevillea robusta . Agroforestry Systems 83: 107–119.Google Scholar
Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2003) L'enquête socio-anthropologique de terrain: synthèse méthodologique et recommandations à l'usage des étudiants. In: LASDEL, Etudes et Travaux, pp. 1–58. Niamey, Niger: Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur les Dynamiques Sociales et le Développement Local (LASDEL).Google Scholar
Perfecto, I., Rice, R. A., Greenberg, R., van der Voort, M. E. (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46: 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S. & Carpenter, S. R. (2003) Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17: 358–366.Google Scholar
Sandker, M., Ruiz-Perez, M. & Campbell, B. M. (2012) Trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and economic development in five tropical forest landscapes. Environmental Management 50: 633–644.Google Scholar
Sassen, M., Sheil, D., Giller, K. E., ter Braake, C. J. F. (2013) Complex contexts and dynamic drivers: understanding four decades of forest loss and recovery in an East African protected area. Biological Conservation 159: 257–268.Google Scholar
Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Klintuni Boedhihartonoa, A., Dayb, M., Garcia, C., van Oostenj, C. & Buckk, L. E. (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 8349–8356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt-Harsh, M. (2013) Landscape change in Guatemala: driving forces of forest and coffee agroforest expansion and contraction from 1990 to 2010. Applied Geography 40: 40–50.Google Scholar
Shoute, J. F. T., Finlke, A. F., Veeneklaas, F. R. & Wolfert, H. P. (1994) Scenario Studies for the Environment. Environment and Policy. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Speelman, E. N., Groot, J. C. J., García-Barrios, L. E., Kok, K., van Keulen, H. & Tittonell, P. (2014) From coping to adaptation to economic and institutional change – trajectories of change in land-use management and social organization in a Biosphere Reserve community, Mexico. Land Use Policy, 41: 31–44.Google Scholar
Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kessler, M., Barkmann, J., Bos, M. M., Buchori, D., Erasmi, S., Faust, H., Gerold, G., Glenk, K., Gradstein, S. R., Guhardja, E., Harteveld, M., Hertel, D., Höhn, P., Kappas, M., Köhler, S., Leuschner, C., Maertens, M., Marggraf, R., Migge-Kleian, S., Mogea, J., Pitopang, R., Schaefer, M., Schwarze, S., Sporn, S. G., Steingrebe, A., Tjitrosoedirdjo, S. S., Tjitrosoemito, S., Twele, A., Weber, R., Woltmann, L., Zeller, M. & Tscharntke, T. (2007) Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 4973–4978.Google Scholar
Tadesse, G., Zavaleta, E., Shennan, C. & FitzSimmons, M. (2014) Policy and demographic factors shape deforestation patterns and socio-ecological processes in southwest Ethiopian coffee agroecosystems. Applied Geography 54: 149–159.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D. & Swackhamer, D. (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292: 281–284.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P., Muriuki, A., Shepherd, K. D., Mugendi, D., Kaizzi, K. C., Okeyo, J., Verchot, L., Coe, R. & Vanlauwe, B. (2010) The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa – a typology of smallholder farms. Agricultural Systems 103: 83–97.Google Scholar
Twery, M. J. (2004) Modelling in forest management. In: Environmental Modelling – Finding Simplicity in Complexity, eds. Wainwright, J. & Mulligan, M., pp. 295–305. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vende, J. (2010) Management of tree cover in coffee-based agroforestry systems of Kodagu. MSc Thesis. Paris, France: AgroParisTech.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gaucherel supplementary material

Gaucherel supplementary material 1

Download Gaucherel supplementary material(File)
File 947.8 KB