Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T19:56:51.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bad data equals bad policy: how to trust estimates of ecosystem loss when there is so much uncertainty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

D. A. FRIESS  and
E. L. WEBB
D. A. FRIESS*
Affiliation:
Singapore-Delft Water Alliance, National University of Singapore, Engineering Drive 2, Singapore 117576 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543
E. L. WEBB*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543
*
*Correspondence: Dr D. A. Friess e-mail: [email protected] and Dr E. L. Webb e-mail: [email protected]
*Correspondence: Dr D. A. Friess e-mail: [email protected] and Dr E. L. Webb e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Scientific evidence will be better incorporated into conservation action and environmental policy if it is deemed credible by decision-makers. However, huge uncertainties are inherent in large-scale ecosystem statistics. Two wetland case studies relating to mangrove areal extent in Peninsular Malaysia and saltmarsh loss in the UK indicate the major causes of information uncertainty, relating to poor methodological description, traceability and assumptions associated with the use of grey literature. Furthermore, potentially inaccurate information can be propagated throughout the research community and gain ‘proof by assertion’, especially if the information originates from an authoritative source. Researchers must better consider implicit and explicit uncertainty and be critical of secondary information. Future information production requires the use of rigorous peer-reviewed methodologies in order to decrease and quantify error. Such steps will increase the credibility of scientific evidence, so researchers can better contribute to a two-way science and policy deliberation approach.

Type
Comment
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Airoldi, L. & Beck, M.W. (2007) Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 45: 345–405.Google Scholar
Alongi, D. (2002) Present state and future of the World's mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation 29: 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, P.W., Crooks, S., Drewitt, A., Grant, A., Rehfisch, M.M., Sharpe, J. & Tyas, C.J. (2004) Managed realignment in the UK: the first 5 years of colonisation by birds. Ibis 146: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badley, J. & Allcorn, R.I. (2006) Changes in bird use following the managed realignment at Freiston Shore RSPB reserve, Lincolnshire, England. Conservation Evidence 3: 102–105.Google Scholar
Carwardine, J., Klein, C.J., Wilson, K.A., Pressey, R.L. & Possingham, H.P. (2009) Hitting the target and missing the point: target-based conservation planning in context. Conservation Letters 2: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. & Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, V.C. (2006) Sustainable utilisation and management of mangrove ecosystems of Malaysia. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 9: 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, R.T. (2011) Trouble with the gray literature. Biotropica 43: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, A.M., Farnsworth, E. & Merkt, R.E. (1999) Origins of mangrove ecosystems and the mangrove biodiversity anomaly. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2007) Mangroves of Asia 1980–2005. Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Working Paper 137. Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
Giri, C., Zhu, Z., Tieszen, L.L., Singh, A., Gillette, S. & Kelmelis, J.A. (2008) Mangrove forest distribution (1975–2005) of the tsunami-affected region of Asia. Journal of Biogeography 35: 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L.L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J. & Duke, N. (2011) Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the World using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, A. (1996) An evaluation of the FAO Tropical Forest Resource Assessment, 1990. The Geographical Journal 162: 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, A. (2008) Difficulties in tracking the long-term global trend in tropical forest area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 818–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannaford, J., Pinn, E.H. & Diaz, A. (2006) The impact of Sika Deer grazing on the vegetation and fauna of Arne saltmarsh. Marine Pollution Bulletin 53: 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JNCC (2007) Second report by the UK under Article 17 on the Implementation of the Habitats Directive from January 2001 to December 2006. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK [www document]. URL http://www.jncc.gov.uk/article16Google Scholar
Jusoff, K. & Taha, D.H. (2008) Managing sustainable mangrove forests in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development 1: 88–96.Google Scholar
IPCC (2001) Working Group II Report: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loneragan, N.R., Ahmed Adnam, N., Connolly, R.M. & Manson, F.J. (2005) Prawn landings and their relationship with the extent of mangroves and shallow waters in western Peninsular Malaysia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, A. (2005) Assessing the world's forests. Global Environmental Change 15: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiszkowska, N. (2010) Intertidal habitats and ecology. In: MCCIP Annual Report Card 2010–11. Marine Climate Change Impacts Partnership [www document]. URL http://www.mccip.org.uk/media/7562/mccip-report-2010–2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Möller, I. (2006) Quantifying saltmarsh vegetation and its effect on wave height dissipation: results from a UK east coast saltmarsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 69: 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northern Ireland Environment Agency (2005) Northern Ireland Habitat Plan: Coastal Saltmarsh. Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Department of Environment [www document]. URL http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/coastalsaltmarsh_pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Page, S.E., Rieley, J.O. & Banks, C.J. (2010) Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilcher, R., Burston, P., Kindleysides, D. & Davis, R. (2002) Seas of Change: the Potential Area for Inter-tidal Habitat Creation around the Coast of Mainland Britain. Sandy, UK: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
Pontee, N.I., Drummond, J.R. & Morrisey, D.J. (2004) Coastline change and implications for habitat loss. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Maritime Engineering 157: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rands, M.R., Adams, W.M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S.H., Clements, A., Coomes, D., Entwhistle, A., Hodge, I., Kapos, V., Scharlemann, J.P., Sutherland, W.J. & Vira, B. (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329: 1298–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riisgård, H.U. (2003) Misuse of the peer-review system: time for countermeasures? Marine Ecology Progress Series 258: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Luna, A., Acosta-Velázquez, J. & Berlanga-Robles, C.A. (2008) On the reliability of the data of the extent of mangroves: a case study in Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management 51: 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, M., Kainuma, M. & Collins, L. (2010) World Atlas of Mangroves. London, UK: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. & Knight, T.M. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 305–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Biodiversity Group (1999) UKBAP Tranche 2 Action Plans. Volume V: Maritime Species and Habitats. Peterborough, UK: UK Biodiversity Group.Google Scholar
Walters, B.B, Rönnbäck, P., Kovacs, J.M., Crona, B., Hussain, S.A., Badola, R., Primavera, J.H., Barbier, E. & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2008) Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquatic Botany 89: 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R.T. (2005) Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 471–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zedler, J.B. & Kercher, S. (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services and restorability. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Friess Supplementary Material

Friess Supplementary Summary

Download Friess Supplementary Material(File)
File 27.1 KB