Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:56:22.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Village Ecocomplex Functioning With Common Property Resources: A Case-study on Coastal Orissa, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Hara Prasad Sahoo  and
Malaya Kumar Misra
Malaya Kumar Misra
Affiliation:
Ecology & Floristics Laboratory, Department of Botany, Berhampur University, Berhampur 760007, Orissa, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A study of the status of Common Property Resources (CPRs) in the coastal areas of Orissa, India, was made during 1989–90 to investigate privatization of land and its socio-economic implications for the rural poor.

The proportion of CPR land to the total area of the villages was 20%, and the persons per hectare of CPR land numbered 70. High density of population in these areas imparts tremendous pressure on the natural resources. The area of the CPR lands in the villages has declined by 40% since ad 1950.

The main cause of decline of CPRs is privatization. Transfer of CPR land to poor people through various social welfare programmes for their private use, and illegal occupation of the CPR land leading to subsequent legalization, were two important factors which resulted in large-scale privatization. The rural poor depend on CPRs for food, fodder, and fuel, in a variety of ways. Due to privatization, they have collectively lost a significant part of their source of livelihood in recent years.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 57 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deodikar, G.A. (1983). Intra-structural imperatives for Indian socioeconomic reconstruction: III. Restoration of sea-shore vegetation for control of coastal erosion by rains, wind, and tidal waves. Society and Science, 6(2), pp. 40–8.Google Scholar
Das, B.M. & Lakhar, B.C. (1990). Cultural change in a disturbed physical environment: a microlevel case-study. J. Hum. Ecol., 1(1), pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.G. (1982). Grassland and livestock resources management. Chapter IX, pp. 305–64, in Integrated Natural and Human Resources Planning and Management in the Hills of Uttar Pradesh. G.B. Pant University, Pantnagar, India, Mimeogr. [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Jodha, N.S. (1985 a). Market forces and erosion of Common Property Resources, Pp. 263–77 in Agricultural Markets in the Semi-arid Tropics (Proceedings of the International Workshop, 10 24–28 1983) ‘ICRISAT Centre, India’: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Jodha, N.S. (1985 b). Population growth and the decline of Common Property Resources in Rajasthan, India. Population and Development Review, 11(2), pp. 247–64, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodha, N.S. (1986). Common Property Resources and rural poor in Dry Regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly, XXI(27), pp. 1169–81, illustr.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.A. (1981). Whither the shoreline? Science, 214, p. 428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, B.K. & Ramakrishnan, P.S. (1982). Energy flow through a village ecosystem with slash and burn agriculture in Northeastern India. Agric. Systems., 9, pp. 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maikhuri, R.K. & Ramakrishnan, P.S. (1990). Ecological analysis of a cluster of villages emphasizing land-use of different tribes in Meghalaya in North-east India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 31, pp. 17–37, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moench, M. (1989). Forest degradation and the structure of biomass utilization in a Himalayan foothills village. Environmental Conservation, 16(2), pp. 137–46, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, S.P. (1989). Biomass Energy Production and Consumption in a Tribal Village Ecosystem. M. Phil. Dissertation, Berhampur University, Orissa, India: 60 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nayak, S.P., Nisanka, S.K. & Misra, M.K. (1993). Biomass and energy dynamics in a tribal village ecosystem of Orissa, India. Biomass & Bioenergy, 4, pp. 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negi, P.S. (1982). Trend of outmigration by caste, sex, and age-group in Tehri Garhwal. The North-Eastern Geographer, 14(1&2), pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
Nisanka, S.K. & Misra, M.K. (1990 a). Ecological study of an Indian village ecosystem: biomass production and consumption. Biomass, 23, pp. 117–36, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisanka, S.K. & Misra, M.K. (1990 b). Ecological study of an Indian village ecosystem: Energetics. Biomass, 23, pp. 165–78, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindranath, N.H., Nagaraju, S.M., Somasekhar, H.I., Channeswarappa, A., Balakrishna, M., Balachandran, B.N. & Reddy, A.K.N. (1981). An Indian village agricultural ecosystem-case-study of Ungra village, Part-1: Main Observations. Biomass, 1, pp. 61–76, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, A.K.N. (1981). An Indian village agricultural ecosystem — case-study of Ungra village: Part II, Discussion. Biomass, 1, pp. 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revelle, R. (1982). Carbon dioxide and world climate. Sci. American, 247, pp. 33–41, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, H.P. & Misra, M.K. (1992). Ecological study of an Indian coastal village ecosystem. Intern. J. Environmental Studies 39, pp. 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venu, P., Virendra, K. & Bhasin, M.K. (1990). Human activity and its impact on vegetation: a case-study in Sikkim Himalayas. J. Hum. Ecol., 1(1), pp. 27–38, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar