Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:41:46.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress Tolerance of Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Arne Jernelöv  and
Rutger Rosenberg
Arne Jernelöv
Affiliation:
Swedish Water and Air Pollution Research Laboratory, Hälsingegatan 43, P.O. Box 21060, S-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden
Rutger Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Swedish Water and Air Pollution Research Laboratory, Sten Sturegatan 42, P.O. Box 5207, S-402 24 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is conventionally argued that a stable ecosystem, namely one with high species-diversity and high constancy in physical parameters, is less sensitive to additional stress than a system with varying physical parameters and low species-diversity. By this logic, the Baltic would be more susceptible to additional stress, such as that of pollution, than the North Sea.

Examples of irreparable damage to some of the most stable ecosystems in the world, such as coral reefs and tropical rain-forests, suggest, on the contrary, that these systems are more vulnerable than low-diversity ecosystems, such as a brackish-water zone in the mouth of a river or a coniferous forest in a temperate region.

Studies of stress tolerance in estuaries showed that the species already living under stress, such as that of reduced and changing salinities, were more tolerant to pollution than species in a less fluctuating environment. This adaptability to environmental changes seems to be characteristic of ecosystems with a low degree of individual specialization and high genetic diversity (i.e. a large number of alleles). Following this conclusion, we question the underlying assumptions in the statement that for example the Baltic Sea, which can be regarded as a large estuary, is an area particularly susceptible to stress; purely marine ecosystems are probably more sensitive.

Ecosystem stress-tolerance should be made a top priority in ecological research; this is a necessity inter alia for future localization of industries, in order to minimize their effects on the environment.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 1976 , pp. 43 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boesch, D. F. (1972). Species diversity of marine macrobenthos in the Virginia area. Chesapeake Science, 13, pp. 206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, D. F. (1974). Diversity, stability and response to human disturbance in eastuarine ecosystems. Pp. 109–14 in Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands: 412 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Endean, R. & Stablum, W. (1975). Population explosions of Acanthaster planci and associated destruction of the hardcoral cover of reels of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Environmental Conservation, 2 (4), pp. 247–56, 7 figs.Google Scholar
Fager, E. W. (1972). Diversity: a sampling study. Am. Nat., 106, pp. 293–310.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. P. (1974). Opportunistic life-histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. J. Mar. Res., 32, pp. 253–84.Google Scholar
Jernelöv, A. (1971). Om diversifiering, stabilitet och stresstolerans hos ekosystem. Vatten, 4, pp. 412–4.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York: viii + 286 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R. (1971). Recovery of the littoral fauna in Salt-källefjord subsequent to discontinued operations of a sulphite pulp mill. Thalassia Jugost., 7, pp. 341–51, illustr.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R. (1972). Benthic faunal recovery in a Swedish fjord following the closure of a sulphite pulp mill. Oikos, 23, pp. 93–108, illustr.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R. (1973). Succession in benthic macrofauna in a Swedish fjord subsequent to the closure of a sulphite pulp mill. Oikos, 24, pp. 244–58, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, R. (in press). Stressed tropical benthic faunal communities off Miami, Florida. Ophelia, 14.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R., Nilsson, K. & Landner, L. (1975). Effects of a sulphate pulp mill on the benthic macrofauna in a firth in the Bothnian Sea. Merentutkimuslait. Julk. / Havsforskningsinst., Skr. No. 239, pp. 289–300, illustr.Google Scholar
Tulkki, P. (1969). Die Bodentiere als Indikatororganismen für Verunreinigung in einem Brackwassergebiet. Limnologica, 7, pp. 79–83.Google Scholar