Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:43:19.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infestation by Aquatic Weeds of the Fern Genus Salvinia: Its Status and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

S.A. Abbasi  and
P.C. Nipaney
S.A. Abbasi
Affiliation:
Head-in-charge, Water Quality & Environment Division, Centre for Water Resources Development & Management, Kunnamangalam P.O., Kozhikode 673 571, Kerala, India (Concurrently: Visiting Professor, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California 94928, USA)
P.C. Nipaney
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Water Quality & Environment Division, Centre for Water Resources Development & Management, Kunnamangalam P.O., Kozhikode 673 571, Kerala, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The paper starts with a report on the growing predominance of aquatic weeds of the genus Salvinia in the waterbodies of the world. The various ways in which Salvinia molesta, particularly, causes pollution and depletion water resources are then reviewed, as are the attempts made so far to control and eradicate Salvinia through chemical, biological, and mechanical, means. It is shown not only that these attempts have failed to achieve their purpose but also that there are possibilities of environmental backlashes being caused by the introduction of chemicals or bioagents into the environment. The importance developing environmentally safe methods of utilization Salvinia has been stressed, so that the cost of mechanical removal of the weed can be offset by the profits earned through its utilization.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1986 , pp. 235 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1981 a). Tolerance and Growth of Aquatic Weed Salvinia on Waters Treated with Metal Pollutants. Basic Data Report No.WQE/BD-1/81, CWRDM, Calicut, India: 46 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1981 b). Biogas Production from Different Aquatic Weeds and Mixtures of Weeds. Basic Data Report No.WQE/BD-7/81, CWRDM, Calicut, India: 39 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1981 c). Effect of Temperature and Water Proportion on Biogas Production from Salvinia. Basic Data Report No.WQE/BD/6/81, CWRDM, Calicut, India: 42 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1981 d). Biogas from Salvinia Catalysed by Trace Elements. Basic Data Report No.CWRDM/TR/0020, CWRDM, Calicut, India: 50 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1982). Tolerance and Growth of Aquatic Weed Salvinia on Waters Treated with Trace Elements, Basic Data Report No.WQE/BD-8/82, CWRDM, Calicut. India: 47 pp. (mimeogr.)Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1983). Biogas System—An Indexed Bibliography. Report, CWRDM, Calicut, India: 429 pp.Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1984 a). Biogas Production from Water-hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms alone and in combination with African Payal Salvinia molesta Mitchell. Pp. 550–8 in UNEP Reports and Proceedings Series 7-Water Hyacinth, RRL, Hyderabad, 1983 (Ed. Thyagarajan, G.). United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi [only reprint available].Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1984 b). The catalytic effect of copper (II), zinc (II), and nickel (II), on the anaerobic digestion of Salvinia molesta Mitchell. Pp. 237–42, in Energy Developments: New Forms, Renewables, Conservation (Ed. Curtis, Fred A.). Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, UK: xxiv+ 1026 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1984 c). Generation of biogas from Salvinia molesta Mitchell in a commercial biogas digester. Environmental Technology Letters, 5, pp. 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, S.A. & Nipaney, P.C. (1985). Wastewater treatment using aquatic plants: survivability and growth of Salvinia molesta Mitchell over waters treated with zinc (II) and the subsequent utilization of the harvested weeds for energy (biogas) production. Resources and Conservation, 12, pp. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, L.O. (1973). Use of Harvested Weeds. Unpublished report from the Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Bailey, W.M. (1972). Arkansas Evaluation of the Desirability of Introducing White Amur (Ctenoxtharynzodon ideUa) for Control of Aquatic Weeds. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Ruck, Arkansas, USA: 59 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Bhambie, S. & Bhardwaj, K.R. (1979). Studies in pteridophytes, XVIII: Use of Salvinia auriculata—an obnoxious weed—in paper industry. Hydrobiologia, 65, pp. 209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, G.E. (1960). Responses to environmental factors by plants in the vegetative phase. Pp. 525–56 in Growth of Living Systems (Ed. Xarrow, M.X.), Basic Books, New York, NY, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Boyd, C.E. (1967). An evaluation of some common aquatic weeds as possible feed-stuffs. Hyacinth Control Journal, 7, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. (1980). Food Potential of Aquatic Macrophytes. International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines, pp. 10–5. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Edwards, P. (1981). Water Weeds as Fish Feed—a Potential Weed Control Technique for Indonesia. UNESCO Report, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 10–4. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Finlayson, C.M., Farrell, T.P. & Griffiths, D.J. (1982). Treatment of Sewage Effluent Using the Water-fern Salvinia. Water Research Foundation of Australia, Report No. 57, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Frank, P.A. (1976). Distribution and utilization of research on tropical and subtropical aquatic weeds in the United States. Pp. 353–9 in Varshney & Rzoska, q.v.Google Scholar
Gaudet, J.J. (1976). Salvinia infestation of Lake Naivasha in East Africa (Kenya). Pp. 193–9 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
George, K. (1956). Destruction of Salvinia through herbicides. Trans. Bose Research Institute, 21, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
George, K. (1976). Studies on the chemical control of some important aquatic weeds of Kerala; Salvinia, Ludwigia, and Cyperus. Pp. 255–62 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
Gupta, O.P. (1979). Aquatic Weeds: Their Menace and Control—A Textbook and Manual. Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, India: 272 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Holm, L. & Yeo, R. (1980). The biology, control and utilization of aquatic weeds. Part IV. Weeds Today (Spring), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
International Plant Protection Centre (cited as IPPC) (1983). Salvinia biogas in Indian kitchens. Aquaphyte, 3, p. 4, 2 figs.Google Scholar
James, L.F., Shupe, J.L., Binns, M. & Keeler, R.F. (1967). Abortive and teratogenic effect of locoweed on sheep and cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 28, pp. 1370–88.Google Scholar
Kannan, K.P. (1979). Ecological and socio-economic consequences on water control projects in Kuttanad region of Kerala. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Engineering Science (Rural Technology), C 2(Part 4), pp. 417–32, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadi & Village Industries Commission (cited as KVIC) (1984). Gobar Gas: Why and How. KVIC, Bombay, India: 26 pp.Google Scholar
Majid, F.Z. & Akthar, N. (1980). Use of aquatic Algae and aquatic weeds as livestock feed. Pp. 1–6 in Seminar on Maximum Maximum Livestock Production on Minimum Land. BCSIR Laboratories, Dacca, Bangladesh. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Mani, V.S., Gautman, K.C. & Kulsherestha, G. (1976). Progress of aquatic weed control in India and suggestions for further research. Pp. 224–33 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. (1970). Autecological Studies of Salvinia auriculata Aubl. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London, England, UK: 669 pp., illustr. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. (1976). The growth and management of Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia spp. Pp. 167–77 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. (1979). Aquatic weeds in Papua New Guinea. Science New Guinea, 6, pp. 154–60.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S., Petr, T. & Viner, A.B. (1980). The water-fern Salvinia molesta in the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea. Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 115–22, 4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. & Thomas, P. (1972). Ecology of Water Weeds in the Neotropics. International Hydrological Decade, Technical Papers Hydrology, 12, UNESCO, Paris, France: 50 pp., 4 figs.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, S.K. & Taraphdar, S.K. (1976). Aquatic weed problems in West Bengal and control through herbicides. Pp. 269–77 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
Nair, B.K. (1978). African Payal Research Report. Unpublished report on a Survey Conducted by a Committee constituted by the Kerala Government. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (cited as NAS) (1976). Making Aquatic Weeds Useful: Some Perspective for Developing Countries. Report of an ad hoc Panel of the Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation, Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Commission of International Relations, Washington, DC, USA: vii + 175 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
National Science Research Council (cited as NSRC) (1974). An International Centre for Manatee Research. Report of a Workshop held 7–13 02 1974, Georgetown, Guyana: iv + 34 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Patnaik, S. (1972). Observations on control of Pistia stratiotes in fish ponds by Gramoxone. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (B), 75, pp. 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipose, M.T. (1976). Fifty years of aquatic weeds control in India. Pp. 215–23 in Varshney & Rzoska, q.v.Google Scholar
Price, E.C. & Cheremisinoff, P.N. (1981). Biogas Production and Utilization. (Energy Technology Series.) Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Michigan, USA: vi + 146 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Room, P.M., Harley, K.L.S., Forno, T.V. & Sands, D.P.A. (1981). Successful biological control of the floating weed Salvinia. Nature (London), 294, pp. 78–80, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, E. (1971). Biological control of pond weeds with white Chinese geese. Hawaii Farm Science, 20, pp. 11–2.Google Scholar
Sankaran, T. (1976). Possibilities of biological control of the aquatic weeds Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia auriculata in India. Pp. 323–30 in Varshney & Rzóska, q.v.Google Scholar
Sculthorpe, C. (1967). The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London, England UK. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Sy, S.H., Korgel, R.G., Livermoore, D.G. & Bruhn, H.D. (1973 MS). Utilization of Eurasian Water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum). Unpublished Report from the Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Thomas, K.J. (1976). Observation on the aquatic vegetation of Trivandrum, Kerala. Pp. 99–102 in Varshney & Rzoska, q.v.Google Scholar
Thomas, K.J. (1981). The role of aquatic weeds in changing the pattern of ecosystems in Kerala. Environmental Conservation, 8(1), pp. 63–6, 5 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, C.K. & Rzóska, J. (1976). Aquatic Weeds in South East Asia: Proceedings of a Regional Seminar on Noxious Aquatic Vegetation, New Delhi, 12–17 December 1973. Dr W. Junk BV, Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands: xviii + 396 pp., illustr.Google Scholar