Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:49:00.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Value–Action Gap through Shared Values, Capabilities and Deforestation Behaviours in Guatemala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

Jane Robb ,
Jeremy Haggar ,
Richard Lamboll  and
Edwin Castellanos
Jane Robb*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
Jeremy Haggar
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
Richard Lamboll
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
Edwin Castellanos
Affiliation:
Centre for Environment and Biodiversity Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala
*
Author for correspondence: Jane Robb, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Understanding drivers of deforestation is essential for developing any successful intervention to reduce forest degradation or loss, yet there remains relatively little consensus or clarity on how drivers should be identified and classified. To capture the full range of values and mediating factors that may contribute to land-use behaviours, an approach derived from a shared values perspective that includes a range of values associated with whole landscapes and ecosystems is required. We developed a model that combines behavioural theory with the Capability Approach as a conceptual framework through which to investigate the value–action gap. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of Likert-scale responses to belief statements in order to identify land users’ shared values in the Sarstún Motagua region of Guatemala. We then qualify and quantify the role of capabilities in mediating between the shared values of different cultural groups of land users (Q’eqchi Maya and Ladinos) by comparing their factor scores with their self-reported forest cover change behaviours. Our results indicate that Maya and Ladinos share a set of values, but hold different value orientations that predict their behavioural intentions. We find that their different value orientations reflect behavioural intentions, but an understanding of the capabilities available to different groups is also necessary to fill the value–action gap. These findings have implications for behavioural theory, providing empirical links between shared values, capabilities and behaviour and identification of the role of value orientations, as well as demonstrating a useful approach for decision-makers seeking to understand drivers of change at landscape and whole-ecosystem levels.

Keywords

valuesbehaviourdrivers of deforestationCapability Approachvalue orientationsshared valuesvalue–action gapGuatemala
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 46 , Issue 3: Thematic Section: Bringing Species and Ecosystems Together with Remote Sensing Tools to Develop New Biodiversity Metrics and Indicators , September 2019 , pp. 226 - 233
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J (1999) Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment 3: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetta, G, Voghera, A (2008) Evaluating landscape for shared values: tools, principles, and methods. Landscape Research 33: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, A (2008) Reference report: an overview of behaviour change models and their uses. GSR Behaviour Change Knowledge Review, Government Social Research, UK [www document]. URL https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/498065/Behaviour_change_reference_report_tcm6-9697.pdf.Google Scholar
Drescher, M, Warriner, GK, Farmer, JR, Larson, BMH (2017) Private landowners and environmental conservation: a case study of social-psychological determinants of conservation program participation in Ontario. Ecology and Society 22: 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, L, Nordlund, A, Schenk, T, Westin, K (2015) A study of forest values and management attitudes in the general public in Germany and Sweden: does context matter? Journal of Environment Planning and Management. 58, 1412–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, R, Burgess, J, Church, A, Turner, K (2011) Shared values for the contributions ecosystem services make to human well-being. In: UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report, pp. 1183–1194. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M, Ajzen, I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Foddy, W (1994) Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fulton, DC, Manfredo, MJ, Lipscomb, J (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, CR (2002) Does multiculturalism menace? Governance, cultural rights and the politics of identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 485–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, MD (2002) Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s values orientation theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 4: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work–Related Values. London UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Kenter, JO, O’Brien, L, Hockley, N, Ravenscroft, N, Fazey, I, Irvine, KN, Reed, MS, Christie, M, Brady, E, Bryce, R, Church, A, Cooper, N, Davies, A, Evely, A, Everard, M, Fish, R, Fisher, JA, Jobstvogt, N, Molloy, C, Orchard-Webb, J, Ranger, S, Ryan, M, Watson, V, Williams, S (2015) What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics 111: 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenter, JO, Hyde, T, Christie, M, Fazey, I (2011) The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries–evidence from the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 21: 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluckhohn, FR, Strodtbeck, FL (1961) Variations in Value Orientations. Oxford, UK: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Knott, D, Muers, S, Aldridge, S (2008) Achieving Culture Change: A Policy Framework. London, UK: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Kollmuss, A, Agyeman, J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8: 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C, Wang, CP, Liu, ST, Weng, LH (2010) Forest value orientations and importance of forest recreation services. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 2342–2348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Carr, D (2004) Ladino and Q’eqchi Maya land use and land clearing in the Sierra de Lacandon National Park, Petén, Guatemala. Agriculture and Human Values 21: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfredo, MJ, Teel, TL, Bright, AD, Bosworth, R, Shroufe, D, Kruckenberg, L, Loker, C, Romberg, B, Casper, J, Gray, T, Sikorowski, L, Smeltzer, J, Beucler, M, Harmoning, A, Gigliotti, L (2003) Why are public values toward wildlife changing? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milfont, TL, Duckitt, J (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milfont, TL, Gouveia, VV (2006) Time perspective and values: an exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Dhubháin, Á, Cobanova, R, Karppinen, H, Mizaraite, D, Ritter, E, Slee, B, Wall, S (2007) The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small-Scale Forestry 6: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9: 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlove, BS (2002) Lines in the Water: Nature and Culture at Lake Titicaca. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S, Matero, J, Shannon, MA (2012) Do forest values influence compliance with forestry legislation? The case of farmers in the fringes of forest reserves in Ghana. Small-Scale Forestry 12: 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M, Hubacek, K, Bonn, A (2013) Anticipating and managing future trade-offs and complementarities between ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 18: 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I (2005) The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development 6: 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M (1973) The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues 50:19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, SH (2001) A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. European Social Survey Core Questionnaire Development, chapter 7, pp 259–319 [www document]. URL www.europeansocialsurvey.org/methodology.Google Scholar
Schwartz, SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–65.Google Scholar
Schwartz, SH, Cieciuch, J, Vecchione, M, Davidov, E, Fischer, R, Beierlein, C, Ramos, A, Verkasalo, M, Lönnqvist, J-E, Demirutku, K, Dirilen-Gumus, O, Konty, M (2012) Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103: 663–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A (2001) Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A, McMurrin, S (1979) Equality of what? Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sharaunga, S, Mudhara, M, Wale, E (2013) Values rural households in KwaZulu-Natal hold towards forests and their participation in community-based forest management. Agrekon 52: 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharaunga, S, Mudhara, M, Wale, EZ (2015) Factors influencing forest value orientations among rural households in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Agroforestry Systems 89: 943–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaske, J, Donnelly, M (1999) A value-attitude–behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources 12: 523–537.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Robb et al. supplementary material

Appendix S1

Download Robb et al. supplementary material(File)
File 274.3 KB