Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:28:32.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants and efficacy of social capital in lake associations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2007

DANIEL BOYD KRAMER
DANIEL BOYD KRAMER*
Affiliation:
370 North Case Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr Daniel B. Kramer Tel: +1 517 432 2199 Fax: +1 517 432 1804 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The hundreds of lake associations in Minnesota are examples of voluntary collective action organizations. Although these groups are organized for several purposes, their main concern is environmental management and specifically the improvement or preservation of lake water quality. Social capital probably affects organizational effectiveness. Survey and biophysical data were used to examine the determinants and efficacy of social capital in lake associations. Social capital production in lake associations was associated with water quality, lake size, recreational preferences, seasonality of residents, location, information sharing, per caput budget and relations with local government. Social capital also had a significant but small positive relationship with lake water clarity. Natural resource policy makers might consider investments in social capital as part of their strategy portfolio. Although statistical analyses of the role of social capital in local environmental management using large sample sizes are promising, several measurement and methodological difficulties remain.

Keywords

collective actionsocial capitalwater quality
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 186 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development 29 (10): 1649–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. & La Ferrara, E. (2000) Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 847–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baland, J. & Platteau, J. (1996) Halting Degradation of Natural Resource: Is their a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P. (1993) Symposium on management of local commons. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (4): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R. (2005) Participation in voluntary associations: relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology 26 (3): 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F., ed. (1989) Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-based Sustainable Development. London, UK: Bellhaven Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2002) Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal 112: F419–F436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, H.E., Verba, S. & Scholzman, K.L. (1995) Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 9: 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. & Rahn, W. (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramb, R.A. (2006) The role of social capital in the promotion of conservation farming: the case of ‘land-care’ in the southern Philippines. Land Degradation and Development 17: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corporation for National and Community Service (2007) Volunteering in America: 2007 city trends and rankings. Office of Research and Policy Development, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2002) Social capital and economic performance: analytics. Mimeo, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (2000) Democracy in America. Translated and edited by Mansfield, H.C. & Winthrop, D.. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhesi, A.S. (2000) Social capital and community development. Community Development Journal 35 (3): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillion, P.J. & Rigler, F.H. (1975) A simple method for predicting the capacity of a lake for development based on lake trophic status. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32 (9): 1519–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlauf, S.N. (2007) On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal 112: F459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esman, M. & Uphoff, N. (1984) Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1996) Government action, social capital, and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development 24 (6): 1119–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (2004) Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foley, M.W. & Edwards, B. (1999) Is it time to disinvest in social capital. Journal of Public Policy 19 (2): 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2000) Social capital and civil society: IMF Working Paper WP/00/74, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H.S. (1954) The economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62: 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, R.Q. & Knowles, S. (2004) Social capital and national environmental performance: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Environment and Development 13 (4): 336–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isham, J. & Kähkönen, S. (1999) What determines the effectiveness of community-based water projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia on demand responsiveness, service rules, and social capital. In: Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 14, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Kapoor, I. (2001) Towards participatory environmental management? Journal of Environmental Management 63 (3): 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic impact? a cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1252–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, A. & Uphoff, N. (1999) Mapping and measuring social capital: a conceptual and empirical study of collective action for conserving and developing watersheds in Rajasthan, India. In: Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 13, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
La Peyre, M., Mendelssohn, I.A., Reams, M., Templet, P. & Grace, J. (2001) Identifying determinants of nations’ wetland management programs using structural equation modeling. Environmental Management 27 (6): 859–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luzar, J.E. & Diagne, A. (1999) Participation in the next generation of agriculture conservation programs: the role of environmental attitudes. Journal of Socio-Economics 28: 335–349.Google Scholar
Lyon, F. (2000) Trust, networks, and norms: the creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development 28 (4): 663–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathijs, E. (2003) Social capital and farmers’ willingness to adopt countryside stewardship schemes. Outlook on Agriculture 32 (1): 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A.L., van Kooten, G.C. & Wang, S. (2003) Institutional, social and economic roots of deforestation: a cross-country comparison. International Forestry Review 5 (1): 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, E.N. & Seligson, M.A. (1994) Civic culture and democracy: the question of causal relationships. American Political Science Review 88: 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, D. & Pritchett, L. (1999) Cents and sociability: household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Exchange 47 (4): 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, USA and Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pargal, S., Mainul, H. & Gilligan, D. (1999) Social capital in solid waste management: evidence from Dhaka, Bangladesh. In: Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 16, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Plummer, R. & FitzGibbon, J. (2006) People matter: the importance of social capital in the co-management of natural resources. Natural Resources Forum 30: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302: 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1995) Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. The Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York, NY, USA: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, S.J. & Hansen, J.M. (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY, USA: MacMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Stemberger, R.S. & Lazorchak, J.M. (1994) Zooplankton assemblage responses to disturbance gradients. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51: 2435–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollenweider, R.A. (1968) The scientific basis of lake and stream eutrophication, with particular reference to phosphorus and nitrogen as eutrophication factors. Technical Report DAS/DS1/68.27, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Paris, France.Google Scholar
White, T.A. & Runge, C.F. (1995) The emergence and evolution of collective action: lessons from watershed management in Haiti. World Development 23 (10): 1683–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kramer supplementary material

Appendix

Download Kramer supplementary material(File)
File 80.4 KB