Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:45:25.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a smart biosafety regulation: The case of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2009

Ann Kingiri  and
Seife Ayele
Ann Kingiri
Affiliation:
Innogen ESRC Centre, Development Policy and Practice, Technology Faculty, The Open University, Walton Hall, MK7 6AA, UK
Seife Ayele
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is emerging that benefits of new innovations in agricultural biotechnology may not be realised without appropriate biosafety regulatory mechanisms. The Kenyan regulatory experiences related to regulation of genetically engineered (GE) agricultural activities are explored to provide some basis for defining the challenges involved in biosafety regulation. The various shortcomings in the way the Kenyan biosafety process has been implemented are consistent with the way regulatory systems have been evolving in Africa. The proposed adoption of a “smart regulation” provides the basis for a learning process through which subsequent biotechnology policy initiatives can be improved.

Keywords

agricultural biotechnologybiosafetysmart regulationKenya
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 133 - 139
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009

References

Ayele S (2007) IRMA: a science and technology-based intervention to reduce hunger? Case study course teaching material, TU870, Capacities for Managing Development, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Ayele, S, Chataway, J, Wield, D (2006) Partnerships in African Crop Biotech. Nat. Biotechnol. 24: 619–621 CrossRef
Bananuka JA (2007) Biotechnology capacity building needs in Eastern Africa. In Biotechnology, Eastern African Perspectives on Sustainable Development and Trade Policy, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, Switzerland and African Technology Policy Studies (ATPS) network, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 29–43
Black, J (1998) Regulation as facilitation: negotiating the genetic revolution. The Modern Law Review 61: 621–660 CrossRef
Braithwaite, J, Coglianese C, Levi-Faur D (2007) Can regulation and governance make a difference? Regulation & Governance 1: 1–7 CrossRef
FAO (2004) The State of Food & Agriculture. Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor?, Food & Agricultural Organisation (FAO), Rome, Italy
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, Sage
Haas, PM (2004) When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. J. Eur. Public Policy 11: 569–592 CrossRef
Hall A (2005) Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: An innovation systems view of what is and how to develop it. J. Int. Dev. 17: 611–630
Harsh, M (2005) Formal and informal governance of agricultural biotechnology in Kenya: Participation and accountability in controversy surrounding the draft biosafety bill. J. Int. Dev. 17: 661–677 CrossRef
Hisano, S (2005) A critical observation on the mainstream discourse of biotechnology for the poor. Tailoring Biotechnologies 1: 81–106
Jasanoff, S (1987) Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Soc. Stud. Sci. 17: 195–230 CrossRef
Juma C, Serageldin I (Lead Authors) (2007) Freedom to Innovate: Biotechnology in Africa's Development, A report of the High-Level African Panel on Modern Biotechnology. African Union (AU) and New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), Addis Ababa and Pretoria
Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) (2005) KARI Strategic Plan, 2005–2015, Ministry of Agriculture
Knorr-Cetina K (1995) Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC, Pinch T, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London, pp 140–166
Levidow, L, Carr, S, Wield, D (2005) European Union regulation of agric-biotechnology: precautionary links between science, expertise and policy. Sci. Public Pol. 32: 261–276 CrossRef
Lyall C, Tait J (2005) A new mode of governance for science, technology, risk and the environment? In Lyall C, Tait J, eds, New modes of governance. Developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk and the environment, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 177–188
Newell P (2002) Biotechnology and politics of regulation. IDS Working Paper 146, Biotechnology Policy Series 3, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity press, Cambridge, UK
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2003) `Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41: 179–194
Odame H, Kameri-Mbote P, Wafula D (2003a) Governing modern agricultural biotechnology in Kenya: implications for food security. IDS Working Paper 199, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Odame H, Kameri-Mbote P, Wafula D (2003b) Innovation and policy process: the case of transgenic sweet potato in Kenya. African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) press, Nairobi, Kenya
Republic of Kenya (RoK) (1982) Sessional paper No. 5 on the acceptance of the Report of the National Council for Science and Technology (NCST); entitled “Science and Technology for Development”
RoK (1998) Regulations and Guidelines for Biosafety in Biotechnology for Kenya, National Council for Science and Technology (NCST), No. 41
RoK (2005a) Strategy for Revitalizing Agriculture (SRA), 2004–2014. Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Livestock & Fisheries Development, and Ministry of Cooperative Development & Marketing
RoK (2005b) Millennium Development Goals in Kenya: needs and costs. http://www.ke.undp.org/KenyaMDGNeedsAssessment.pdf [accessed July 9 2007]
RoK (2006) National Biotechnology Development Policy (2006). Government printer, Nairobi, Kenya
RoK (2009) The Biosafety Act, 2009, Special Kenya Gazette Supplement Feb. 2009, Government printer, Nairobi, Kenya
Russell, WA, Wickson, F, Carew, AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40: 460–472 CrossRef
Scoones I (2002) Science, policy and regulation: challenges for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. IDS Working Paper 147, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Tait, J, Levidow, L (1992) Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulation: the case of biotechnology. Futures 24: 219–231 CrossRef
Tait J, Chataway J, Wield D (2007) Appropriate governance of life sciences. The case for smart regulation. Innogen Policy Brief. No. 2, available at http://www.innogen.ac.uk
Traynor P, Macharia H (2003) Analysis of the biosafety system for biotechnology in Kenya: application of a conceptual framework. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), Country Report 65, The Hague, The Netherlands
van Zwanenberg P, Ely A, Smith A (2008) Rethinking regulation: international harmonisation and local realities. STEPS Working Paper 12, Brighton, STEPS Centre, UK
Wakhungu J, Wafula D (2004) Introducing Bt cotton. Policy lessons for smallholder farmers in Kenya. African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) press, Nairobi, Kenya
World Bank (2007) Enhancing agricultural innovation: How to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. The World Bank, Washington, DC. www.worldbank.org/rural