Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:27:36.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A decade of European field trials with genetically modified plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2004

Karine Lheureux  and
Klaus Menrad
Karine Lheureux
Affiliation:
European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)
Klaus Menrad
Affiliation:
Fachhochschule Weihenstephan (University of Applied Sciences) Wissenschaftszentrum Straubing (Science Centre Straubing) Schulgasse 18, D-94315 Straubing Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article analyzes the development of notifications of genetically modified plants field trials in the European Union from 1991 to 2001, based on the data collected at the European level in the Summary Notification Information Format database. During this time period, a total of 1687 field trial notifications were received. The number of field trial notifications dropped by 76% between 1998 and 2001, mainly due to the de facto moratorium in place since 1999. Input traits (77%) dominated the field trial notifications during the last decade, while output traits were relevant in only 18% of all notifications, with a decreasing relevance during the last six years. In particular, field trial notifications on molecular farming were almost absent in the EU. Large companies focused their field trials on crops with a high grown area in the European Union and resistance traits, while public institutions showed interest in a large diversity of plants and traits. Finally, some conclusions on future impacts of the results of the study are drawn in this article.

Keywords

genetically modified plantsEuropean Unionfield trial notificationsEU SNIF database
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 99 - 107
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2004

References

APHIS (2002) Test conducted under USDA regulations. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. http://www.nbiap.vt.edu/biomon/datacat.html
Arundel A (2002) Agro-food and employment. Science and Public Policy 29: 297–306
Bock A-K, Lheureux K, Libeau M, Nilsagård H, Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2002) Scenarios for co-existence of genetically modified, conventional and organic crops in European agriculture, IPTS/DG JRC Technical Report. European Commission (EUR 20394 EN) Commissioned by the Directorate-General for Agriculture
Conner A, Glare TR, Nap J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II: Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J. 33: 9–46
Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) GMOs: the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer, European Environment Agency. Environmental issue report, No 28
Economic Research Service (ERS) US Department of Agriculture (2003) Adoption of genetically modified engineered crops in the US ERS press release, 10 September 2003
European Commission (2003a) Questions and answers on the regulation of GMOs in the EU, MEMO/02/160-REV
European Commission (2003b) Commission calls on EU Member States to intensify efforts in life sciences and biotechnology, Speech of Commissioner Busquin, 5 March 2003
European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (2001) Concept paper on the development of a Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP): points to consider on the use of transgenic plants in the manufacture of biological medicinal products for human use, CPMP/BWP/1711/00 of 1 March 2001
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2002) Guidance for industry drugs, biologics and medical devices derived from bioengineered plants for use in humans and animals
Freese B (2002) Manufacturing drugs and chemicals in crops: biopharming poses new treats to consumers, farmers, food companies and the environment, Genetically Engineered Food Alert Report, July 2002
Gaskell G, Allum N, Stares S (2003) Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0. European Commission. Commissioned by the Directorate-General for Research
Hellemans, A (2003) Consumer fear cancels European GM research. Scientist 5: 52–54
Huang, J, Rozelle, S, Pray, C, Wang, Q (2002) Plant biotechnology in China. Science 295: 674–677 CrossRef
James C (2002) Global status of commercialised transgenic crops: 2002. ISAAA Briefs No 27
James C (2001) Global review of commercialised transgenic crops: 2001. ISAAA Briefs No 24
Kessler C, Economidis I (2001) EC-sponsored research on safety of genetically modified organisms: a review of results. Directorate General for Research (EUR 19884 EN)
Lheureux K, Libeau-Dulos M, Nilsagard H, Rodriguez Cerezo E, Menrad K, Menrad M, Vorgrimler D (2003) Review of GMOs under research and development and in the pipeline in Europe. IPTS/DG JRC Technical Report. European Commission (EUR 20680 EN) Commissioned by the Directorate-General for Agriculture
Mitchell P (2003) Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research. Nat. Biotechnol. 21: 468–469
Monsanto (2002a) Annual Report 2001, http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/investors/financial_reports/2001Annual-Report.html
Monsanto (2002b) New GM cotton variety approved in Australia, a rapid adoption predicted, Press Release Biotech Knowledge Center, 16 October 2002
Nap J-P, Metz P, Escaler M, Conner A (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Plant J. 33: 1–18
PEW (2001) Harvest on the horizon: future uses of agricultural biotechnology. PEW initiative on food and biotechnology
Reiss T, Dominguez Lacasa I (2003) Performance of European Member States in biotechnology, EPOHITE Workshop Paris, 17 June 2003, http://www.epohite.fhg.de/Documents/Wp4_final_workshop/performance.pdf
Tolstrup K, Andersen S, Boelt B, Buus M, Gylling M, Holm P, Kjellsson G, Pedersen S, Østergård H, Mikkelsen S (2003) Report from the Danish Working Group on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. Conclusions and Summary. Commissioned by the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2002) Information on field testing of pharmaceutical plants in 2002 May 2002 (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/biotech/pdf/pharma_2000.pdf)
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2003) Field testing of plants engineered to produce pharmaceutical and industrial compounds: proposed rules. Federal Register, Vol 68, No 46
Whitfield J (2003) Transgenic cotton a winner in India, Nature Science Update, 7 February 2003