Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:18:27.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-fertilization between genetically modified and non-genetically modified maize crops in Uruguay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Pablo Galeano*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Centro Regional Sur (CRS), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Camino Folle km 36, Progreso, Canelones, Uruguay Cátedra de Bioquímica, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, General Flores 2124, Montevideo, Uruguay
Claudio Martínez Debat
Affiliation:
Sección Bioquímica, Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay
Fabiana Ruibal
Affiliation:
Sección Bioquímica, Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay
Laura Franco Fraguas
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Bioquímica, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, General Flores 2124, Montevideo, Uruguay
Guillermo A. Galván
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Centro Regional Sur (CRS), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Camino Folle km 36, Progreso, Canelones, Uruguay
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The cultivation of genetically modified (GM) Bt maize (Zea mays L.) events MON810 and Bt11 is permitted in Uruguay. Local regulations specify that 10% of the crop should be a non-GM cultivar as refuge area for biodiversity, and the distance from other non-GM maize crops should be more than 250 m in order to avoid cross-pollination. However, the degree of cross-fertilization between maize crops in Uruguay is unknown. The level of adventitious presence of GM material in non-GM crops is a relevant issue for organic farming, in situ conservation of genetic resources and seed production. In the research reported here, the occurrence and frequency of cross-fertilization between commercial GM and non-GM maize crops in Uruguay was assessed. The methodology comprised field sampling and detection using DAS-ELISA and PCR. Five field-pair cases where GM maize crops were grown near non-GM maize crops were identified. These cases had the potential to cross-fertilize considering the distance between crops and the similarity of the sowing dates. Adventitious presence of GM material in the offspring of non-GM crops was found in three of the five cases. Adventitious presence of event MON810 or Bt11 in non-GM maize, which were distinguished using specific primers, matched the events in the putative sources of transgenic pollen. Percentages of transgenic seedlings in the offspring of the non-GM crops were estimated as 0.56%, 0.83% and 0.13% for three sampling sites with distances of respectively 40, 100 and 330 m from the GM crops. This is a first indication that adventitious presence of transgenes in non-GM maize crops will occur in Uruguay if isolation by distance and/or time is not provided. These findings contribute to the evaluation of the applicability of the “regulated coexistence policy” in Uruguay.

Type
Case study
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2011

References

Références

Burris JS (2001) Adventitious pollen intrusion into hybrid maize seed production fields. Proc. 56th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 2001, American Seed Trade Association, Inc., Washington, DC
Dellaporta, SL, Wood, J, Hicks, JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 1921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devos, Y, Reheul, D, De Schrijver, A (2005) The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 7187 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devos, Y, Demont, M, Dillen, K, Reheul, D, Kaiser, M, Sanvido, O (2009) Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29: 1130 Google Scholar
Doebley, J (1990) Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species-genes transformed into maize through genetic-engineering would be transferred to its wild relatives, the teosintes. Bioscience 40: 443448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emberlin J, Adams-Groom B, Tidmarsh J (1999) A report on the dispersal of maize pollen. National Pollen Research Unit, University College, Worcester. Report commissioned by and available from the Soil Association, Bristol House, Bristol, 40–56
FAO/WHO (2002) Consideration of methods for the detection and identification of foods derived from biotechnology. Methods submitted by the ad-hoc intergovernmental task force on foods derived from biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Budapest, Hungary, 36 p
INASE (2008) Available at http://www.inase.org.uy
Jørgensen RB, Wilkinson MJ (2005) Rare hybrids and methods for their detection. In Poppy GM, Wilkinson MJ, eds, Gene flow from GM plants, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 113–142
Langhof, M, Hommel, B, Hüsken, A, Njontie, C, Schiemann, J, Wehling, P, Wilhelm, R, Rühl, G (2010) Coexistence in maize: isolation distance in dependence on conventional maize field depth and separate edge harvest. Crop Sci. 50: 14961508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, S, Figueroa, J, Baltazar, B, Gomez, R, Townsend, R, Schoper, JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci. 41: 15511557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, BL, Subedi, KD, Reid, LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci. 44: 12731282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messeguer, J, Penas, G, Ballester, J, Bas, M, Serra, J, Salvia, J (2006) Pollen-mediated geneflow in maize in real situations of coexistence. Plant Biotech. J. 4: 633645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MGAP (2008) Encuesta Agrícola “Invierno 2008” DIEA, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Uruguay. Available at www.mgap.gub.uy
Montesinos López, OA, Montesinos López, A, Crossa, J, Eskridge, K, Hernández Suárez, CM, (2010) Sample size for detecting and estimating the proportion of transgenic plants with narrow confidence intervals. Seed Sc. Res. 20: 123136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñeyro-Nelson, A, van Heerwaarden, J, Perales, HR, Serratos-Hernández, JA, Rangel, A, Hufford, MB, Gepts, P, Garay-Arroyo, A, Rivera Bustamante, R, Alvarez Buylla, ER, (2009) Transgenes in Mexican maize: molecular evidence and methodological considerations for GMO detection in landrace populations. Mol. Ecol. 18: 750761 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presidential decree 353/08. Available at: http://www.mvotma.gub.uy/dinama/
Riesgo, L, Areal, FJ, Sanvido, O, Rodriguez-Cerezo, E (2010) Statistical analysis of distances needed to limit cross-fertilization between genetically modified and conventional maize in Europe. Nature Biotech. 28: 780782 Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, CJ, Dias Neto, E, Simpson, AJG (1994) Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques 17: 915919 Google ScholarPubMed
Sanou, J, Gouesnard, B, Charrier, A (1997) Isozymes variability in West African maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). Maydica 42: 111 Google Scholar
Sanvido, O, Widmer, F, Winzeler, M, Streit, B, Szerencsits, E, Bigler, F (2008) Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize cultivation. Transgenic Res. 17: 317335 Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, WE, Bringezu, T, Broer, I, Eder, J, Holz, F (2007) Coexistence between GM and non-GM maize crops – Tested in 2004 at the field scale level (Erprobungsanbau 2004). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193: 7992 Google Scholar
Weekes, R, Allnutt, T, Boffey, C, Morgan, S, Bilton, M, Daniels, R, Henry, C (2007) A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK. Transgenic Res. 16: 203211 Google Scholar