Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:58:57.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traditional property rights, common property, and mobility in semi-arid African pastoralist systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

RACHAEL E. GOODHUE  and
NANCY McCARTHY
RACHAEL E. GOODHUE
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, University of California. Email [email protected]
NANCY McCARTHY
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute, George Mason University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional pastoralist land management institutions in sub-Saharan Africa have been stressed by an increasing human population and related forces, including private enclosure of grazing land; government-sponsored privatization; and the increasing prevalence of violent conflicts and livestock theft. We model the incompleteness and flexibility of traditional grazing rights using fuzzy set theory. We compare individual and social welfare under the traditional system to individual and social welfare under a private property system and a common property system. Whether the traditional system is preferred to private property depends on whether the value of mobility, as defined by the traditional system, is more valuable than the right of exclusion inherent in private property. We find that under some conditions the imprecision which characterizes traditional rights can result in higher social returns than a common property regime characterized by complete symmetric rights across all members of the user group and complete exclusion of non-members.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1: GAME THEORY, NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT , February 2009 , pp. 29 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. (1999), Greener Pastures: Politics, Markets, and Community among a Migrant Pastoral People, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Aristidou, M. and Sarangi, S. (2006), ‘Games in fuzzy environments’, Southern Economic Journal 72: 645–659.Google Scholar
Bartels, G. B., Norton, B. E., and Perrier, G. K. (1990), ‘The applicability of the carrying capacity concept in Africa’, Network Paper Set 30, Paper 30e, Pastoral Development Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, http://www.odi.org.uk/pdn/papers/paper30e.html, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Benaroch, M. (1996), ‘Artificial intelligence in economics: truth and dare’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20: 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benin, S. and Pender, J. (2006), ‘Collective action in community management of grazing lands: the case of the highlands of northern Ethiopia’, Environment and Development Economics 11: 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogataj, M. and Usenik, J. (2005), ‘Fuzzy approach to the spatial games in the total market area’, International Journal of Production Economics 93–94: 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. W. and Mearns, R. (2002), ‘Natural resource management and land policy in developing countries: lessons learned and new challenges for the World Bank’, Issue Paper No. 115, Drylands Program, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/9222IIED.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Burnsilver, S. and Mwangi, E. (2007), ‘Beyond group ranch subdivision: collective action for livestock mobility, ecological viability, and livelihoods’, CAPRi Working Paper No. 66, CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Butnariu, D. (1979), ‘Solution concepts for n-person fuzzy games’, in Gupta, M. M., Ragade, R. K., and Yager, R. R. (eds), Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 339–360.Google Scholar
Casimir, M. J. (2003), ‘Pastoral nomadism in a West Himalayan valley: sustainability and herd management’, in Rao, A. and Casimir, M. J. (eds), Nomadism in South Asia, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Chakravorty-Kaul, M. (1996), Common Lands and Customary Law: Institutional Change in North India over the Past Two Centuries, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chakravorty-Kaul, M. (1997), ‘Transhumance – a pastoral response to risk and uncertainty in the Himalayas’, Nomadic Peoples 1: 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravorty-Kaul, M. (1998), ‘Transhumance and customary pastoralist rights in Himachal Pradesh: claiming the high pastures for Gaddis’, Mountain Research and Development 18: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, D. L. (1994), ‘The Borana Plateau of southern Ethiopia: synthesis of pastoral research development and change, 1980–1991’, Systems Study No. 5, International Livestock Centre for Africa, Nairobi, http://www.ilri.cgiar.org/Infoserv/webpub/fulldocs/X5461e/X5461e00.htm, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Cossins, N. J. and Upton, M. (1987), ‘The Borana pastoral system of southern Ethiopia’, Agricultural Systems 25: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotula, L., Toulmin, C., and Hesse, C. (2004), ‘Land tenure and administration in Africa: lessons of experience and emerging issues’, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/9305IIED.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Desta, S. and Coppock, D. L. (2004), ‘Pastoralism under pressure: tracking system change in southern Ethiopia’, Human Ecology 32: 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dompere, K. (1995), ‘The theory of social costs and costing for cost–benefit analysis in a fuzzy decision space’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 76: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driankov, D., Hellendoorn, H., and Reinfrank, M. (1994), An Introduction to Fuzzy Control, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., and Ostasiewicz, W. (1993), ‘Towards fuzzy modeling in economics’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 54: 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fratkin, E. and McCabe, J. T. (1999), ‘East African pastoralism at the crossroads: an introduction’, Nomadic Peoples 3: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberger, M. S. and Freudenberger, K. S. (1993), ‘Pastoralism in peril: pressures on grazing land in Senegal’, Pastoral Land Tenure Series No. 4, Drylands Program, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
Fuys, A., Mwangi, E., and Dohrn, S. (2006), ‘Securing common property regimes in a “modernizing” world: synthesis of 41 case studies on common property regimes from Asia, Africa, Europe and Latin America’, Paper presented at ‘Survival of the Commons: Mounting Challenges and New Realities’, the Eleventh Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Goodhue, R. E. (1998), ‘Sustaining collusion via a fuzzy trigger’, Review of Industrial Organization 13: 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhue, R. E. and McCarthy, N. (1998), ‘Beyond mobility: the role of fuzzy access rights and common property considerations in semi-arid African pastoralist systems’, Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Meetings, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
Goodhue, R. E. and McCarthy, N. (2000), ‘Fuzzy access: modeling grazing rights in sub-Saharan Africa’, in McCarthy, N., Swallow, B., Kirk, M., and Hazell, P. (eds), Property Rights, Risk, and Livestock Development in Africa, Washington, DC and Nairobi: International Food Policy Research Institute and International Livestock Research Institute, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
Graham, O. (1988), ‘Enclosure of the East African rangelands: recent trends and their impact’, Network Paper Set 25, Paper 25a, Pastoral Development Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, http://www.odi.org.uk/pdn/papers/paper25a.html, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Greenhut, J., Greenhut, M. L., and Mansur, Y. (1995), ‘Oligopoly and behavioral uncertainty: an application of fuzzy set theory’, Review of Industrial Organization 10: 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammel, R. (2001), ‘Securing land for herders in Niger’, Drylands Issue Paper E102, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/9025IIED.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Haro, G. O., Doyo, G. J., and McPeak, J. G. (2005), ‘Linkages between community, environmental, and conflict management: experiences from northern Kenya’, World Development 33: 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. (1990), ‘An institutional approach to pastoral development: an example from Ethiopia’, Network Paper Set 30, Paper 30d, Pastoral Development Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, http://www.odi.org.uk/pdn/papers/paper30d.html, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Hundie, B. (2006), ‘Property rights among Afar pastoralists of northeastern Ethiopia: forms, changes and conflicts’, unpublished paper, Humboldt University of Berlin, Presented at ‘Pastoralism and Poverty Reduction in East Africa: A Policy Research Conference’, Nairobi, June, http://www.ilri.org/Link/Publications/Publications/Theme%201/Pastoral%20conference/Papers/Hundie%20property%20rights_ILRI%20conference.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Jamshidi, M., Vadiee, N., and Ross, T. (eds) (1993), Fuzzy Logic and Control: Software and Hardware Applications, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M. (1991), Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, London: International Thomson Computer Press.Google Scholar
Lybbert, T. J., Barrett, C. B., Desta, S., and Coppock, D. L. (2004), ‘Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population’, Economic Journal 114: 750–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansur, Y. (1995), Fuzzy Sets and Economics: Applications of Fuzzy Mathematics to Non-Cooperative Oligopoly, London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
McCarthy, N. (1996), ‘Common property and cooperation in rural Mexico’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
McCarthy, N., Kamara, A. B., and Kirk, M. (2003), ‘Co-operation in risky environments: evidence from southern Ethiopia’, Journal of African Economies 12: 236–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, N. and Vanderlinden, J.-P. (2004), ‘Resource management under climatic risk: a case study from Niger’, Journal of Development Studies 40: 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPeak, J. G. (2003), ‘Analyzing and addressing localized degradation in the commons’, Land Economics 79: 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPeak, J. G. and Barrett, C. B. (2001), ‘Differential risk exposure and stochastic poverty traps among East African pastoralists’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 674–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwangi, E. (2007), ‘Subdividing the commons: distributional conflict in the transition from collective to individual property rights in Kenya's Maasailand’, World Development 35: 815–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwangi, E. and Dohrn, S. (2006), ‘Biting the bullet: how to secure access to drylands resources for multiple users’, CAPRi Working Paper No. 47, CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights, Washington, DC, January.Google Scholar
Netting, R. (1972), ‘Of men and meadows: strategies of Alpine land use’, Anthropological Quarterly 45: 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netting, R. (1976), ‘What Alpine meadows have in common: observations on communal tenure in a Swiss village’, Human Ecology 4: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netting, R. (1981), Balancing on an Alp, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Netting, R. (1982), ‘Territory, property, and tenure’, in McAdams, R., Smelser, N., and Treiman, D. (eds), Behavioral and Social Science Research: A National Resource, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 446–502.Google Scholar
Niamir, M. (1991), ‘Traditional African range management techniques: implications for rangeland development’, Network Paper Set 31, Paper 31d, Pastoral Development Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, http://www.odi.org.uk/pdn/papers/31d.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Oba, G. (1992), ‘Ecological factors in land use conflicts, land administration and food insecurity in Turkana, Kenya’, Network Paper Set 33, Paper 33a, Pastoral Development Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, http://www.odi.org.uk/pdn/papers/paper33a.html, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Oba, G. (2001), ‘The importance of pastoralists' indigenous coping strategies for planning drought management in the arid zone of Kenya’, Nomadic Peoples 5: 89–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, I. (ed.) (1994), Living with Uncertainty, London: International Institute for Environment and Development, Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Solomon, T. B., Snyman, H. A., and Smit, G. N. (2007), ‘Cattle-rangeland management practices and perceptions of pastoralists towards rangeland degradation in the Borana zone of southern Ethiopia’, Journal of Environmental Management 82: 481–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sserunkuuma, D. and Olson, K. (2001), ‘Private property rights and overgrazing: an empirical assessment of pastoralists in Nyabushozi County, western Uganda’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 49: 769–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swallow, B. (1994), ‘The role of mobility within the risk management strategies of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists’, Gatekeeper Series No. 47, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/6061IIED.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
Toulmin, C. (2005), ‘Securing land and property rights in sub-Saharan Africa; the role of local institutions’, in Bigg, T. and Satterthwaite, D. (eds), How to Make Poverty History – the Central Role of Local Organizations in Meeting the MDGs, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, http://www.iied.org/Gov/mdgs/documents/mdg3/ch2_28pp.pdf, accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
van den Brink, R., Bromley, D., and Chavas, J. (1995), ‘The economics of Cain and Abel: agro-pastoral property rights in the Sahel’, Journal of Development Studies 31: 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadeh, L. (1965), ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information and Control 8: 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar