Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:33:52.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The spatial effect of estuaries pollution on the housing rental market: evidence from South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate Open the ORCID record for Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate [Opens in a new window]  and
Maria Alejandra Ruano
Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate*
Affiliation:
Universidad Espíritu Santo, Ecuador
Maria Alejandra Ruano
Affiliation:
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Campus Gustavo Galindo Km 30.5 Vía Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Estuaries are water bodies, many of which contribute to the sustainable development of cities. Many of them are considered natural landscapes, offering various recreational services to the population. However, estuary degradation is a common problem in developing countries. Ecuador, for example, has a significant problem with the pollution of its estuaries. Machala is one of the most affected cities due to the contamination of these water bodies. This issue has generated negative externalities in the housing market. Thus, our central hypothesis is that rental prices of houses are revalued as their distance from polluted estuaries increases. Using the hedonic pricing approach, our results confirm that the price of a residence increases by US$9.45 for every 100 m farther it is from the closest estuary. This amount constitutes approximately 5.25 per cent of the average rental value in Machala.

Keywords

economicsestuarieshedonic pricesnegative environmental externalitiesspatial regression models

JEL classification

Q56: Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth O18: Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis • Housing • Infrastructure Q53: Air Pollution • Water Pollution • Noise • Hazardous Waste • Solid Waste • Recycling
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 69 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ArcMap (2018) How buffer (analysis) works. Available at http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/analysis-toolbox/how-buffer-analysis-works.htmGoogle Scholar
Artell, J (2014) Lots of value? A spatial hedonic approach to water quality valuation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57, 862–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, NJ, Austen, MC, Atkins, JP, Burdon, D, Degraer, S, Dentinho, TP and Marboe, AH (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belcher, RN and Chisholm, R (2018) Tropical vegetation and residential property value: a hedonic pricing analysis in Singapore. Ecological Economics 149, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boerema, A and Meire, P (2017) Management for estuarine ecosystem services: a review. Ecological Engineering 98, 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, DM and Hite, D (2005) Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, WY (2017) Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: a hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning 157, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, WY and Li, X (2017) Cumulative impacts of polluted urban streams on property values: a 3-D spatial hedonic model at the micro-neighborhood level. Landscape and Urban Planning 162, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choumert, J, Stage, J and Uwera, C (2014) Access to water as determinant of rental values: a residence hedonic analysis in Rwanda. Journal of Housing Economics 26, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, G, Polasky, S, Goldstein, J, Kareiva, P, Mooney, H, Pejchar, L and Shallenberger, R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J and Kidd, IM (2012) Identifying major stressors: the essential precursor to restoring cultural ecosystem services in a degraded estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 35, 1007–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, GH and Butry, DT (2011) The effect of urban trees on the rental price of single-family homes in Portland. Oregon. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 10, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drukker, DM, Prucha, IR and Raciborski, R (2013) Maximum-likelihood and generalized spatial two-stage least-squares estimators for a spatial-autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbances. Stata Journal 13, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, X and Huang, Z (2018) Spatial and temporal effects of urban wetlands on housing prices: evidence from Hangzhou, China. Land Use Policy 73, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, GJ, Barrett, NS, Graddon, DJ and Last, PR (2000) The conservation significance of estuaries: a classification of Tasmanian estuaries using ecological, physical and demographic attributes as a case study. Biological Conservation 92, 383–397.Google Scholar
Elhorst, JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, D and Wheeler, SA (2018) How can we value an environmental asset that very few have visited or heard of? Lessons learned from applying contingent and inferred valuation in an Australian wetlands case study. Journal of Environmental Management 220, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvorsen, R and Palmquist, R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 70, 474–475.Google Scholar
Hitaj, C, Lynch, L, McConnell, KE and Tra, CI (2018) The value of ozone air quality improvements to renters: evidence from apartment building transactions in Los Angeles County. Ecological Economics 146, 706–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Z, Chen, R, Xu, D and Zhou, W (2017) Spatial and hedonic analysis of residence prices in Shanghai. Habitat International 67, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, HS, Lee, GE, Lee, JS and Choi, Y (2019) Understanding the local impact of urban park plans and park typology on housing price: a case study of the Busan metropolitan region, Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning 184, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, C (2011) Environmental Economics, 2nd Edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeSage, J and Pace, RK (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B and Wu, S (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 153, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebelt, V, Bartke, S and Schwarz, N (2018) Revealing preferences for urban green spaces: a scale-sensitive hedonic pricing analysis for the city of Leipzig. Ecological Economics 146, 536–548.Google Scholar
Lu, J (2018) The value of a south-facing orientation: a hedonic pricing analysis of the Shanghai housing market. Habitat International 81, 24–32.Google Scholar
Mei, Y, Hite, D and Sohngen, B (2017) Demand for urban tree cover: a two-stage hedonic price analysis in California. Forest Policy and Economics 83, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netusil, NR, Kincaid, M and Chang, H (2014) Valuing water quality in urban watersheds: a comparative analysis of Johnson Creek, Oregon, and Burnt Bridge Creek, Washington. Water Resources Research 50, 4254–4268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poor, PJ, Pessagno, KL and Paul, RW (2007) Exploring the hedonic value of ambient water quality: a local watershed-based study. Ecological Economics 60, 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, IC, Chuwen, BM, Hoeksema, SD and Elliott, M (2010) The concept of an estuary: a definition that incorporates systems which can become closed to the ocean and hypersaline. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 87, 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, AI (2017) Determinación de Cadmio y plomo en agua y sedimento del estuary “El Macho” de la ciudad de Machala (Thesis). Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Rosen, S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, RL (2005) Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior 37, 3–42.Google Scholar
Sander, HA and Zhao, C (2015) Urban green and blue: who values what and where? Land Use Policy 42, 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swoboda, A, Nega, T and Timm, M (2015) Hedonic analysis over time and space: the case of house prices and traffic noise. Journal of Regional Science 55, 644–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trojanek, R and Huderek-Glapska, S (2018) Measuring the noise cost of aviation – the association between the limited use area around Warsaw Chopin Airport and property values. Journal of Air Transport Management 67, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Graevenitz, K (2018) The amenity cost of road noise. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 90, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, PJ, Milon, JW and Scrogin, DO (2011) The spatial extent of water quality benefits in urban housing markets. Land Economics 87, 628–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, F, Householder, E and Wittmann, AO (2015) Implementation of the ramsar convention on South American wetlands: an update. Research and Reports in Biodiversity Studies 4, 47–58.Google Scholar
World Bank (2018) The World Bank in Ecuador. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ecuador/overview.Google Scholar
Yuan, F, Wu, J, Wei, YD and Wang, L (2018) Policy change, amenity, and spatiotemporal dynamics of residence prices in Nanjing, China. Land Use Policy 75, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano-Monserrate, MA (2016) Formación de los precios de alquiler de viviendas en Machala (Ecuador): análisis mediante el método de precios hedónicos. Cuadernos de Economía 39, 12–22, in Spanish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano-Monserrate, MA (2020) The economic value of the Andean Condor: the national symbol of South America. Journal for Nature Conservation 54, 125796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano-Monserrate, MA and Ruano, MA (2019) Does environmental noise affect housing rental prices in developing countries? Evidence from Ecuador. Land Use Policy 87, 104059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano-Monserrate, MA and Ruano, MA (2020) Estimating the damage cost of plastic waste in Galapagos Islands: a contingent valuation approach. Marine Policy 117, 103933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C and Boyle, KJ (2010) The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian watermilfoil) on lakefront property values. Ecological Economics 70, 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L and Yi, Y (2017) Quantile house price indices in Beijing. Regional Science and Urban Economics 63, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar