Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:41:10.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal pollution tax under imperfect competition and international trade: the small country case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

ALEJANDRO SAMPAOLESI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work depicts the possibility of setting up an optimal pollution tax under non-competitive markets and international trade in a small country. The model employed describes a situation of partial equilibrium characterized by imperfect competition among domestic producers, where the domestic good is a substitute for an imported polluting commodity. In this framework, we also bring in the possibility that the domestic firms can introduce innovation offsets via their investment in R&D. From the results, the optimal pollution tax under domestic distortions can be expressed as a function of a ‘domestic production effect’ and a ‘pollution effect’. Furthermore, when the firms execute R&D expenditures, the optimal policy adds an ‘innovation effect’, which captures the change in welfare coming from a decrease in total costs and can lead our results to a win–win situation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 505 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, S. (1994), ‘Strategic environmental policy and international trade’, Journal of Public Economics 54: 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A.L. and de Mooij, R.A. (1994), ‘Environmental taxation and labor market distortions’, European Journal of Political Economy 10: 655–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A.L. and van der Ploeg, F. (1994), ‘Environmental policy, public finance, and the labour market in second-best world’, Journal of Public Economics 55: 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, K. (1993), ‘Taxes and subsidies for pollution-intensive industries as trade policy’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25: 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corden, W. (1997), Trade Policy and Economic Welfare, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A.K. (1988), ‘Optimal trade and industrial policies for the U.S. automobile industry’, in Feenstra, R. (ed.), Empirical Methods for International Trade, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.W. (1994), ‘Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nannerup, N. (1998), ‘Strategic environmental policy under incomplete information’, Environmental and Resource Economics 11: 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. (1990), ‘The Competitive Advantage of the Nations’, New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. and van der Linde, C. (1995), ‘Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D.R. and Bradford, R.L. (1996), ‘Taxing variable cost: environmental regulation as industrial policy’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. (1994), ‘Environmental policy, plant location and government protection’, in Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (eds), Trade, Innovation, Environment, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. (1996), ‘Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 256–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar