Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:22:06.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural capital in the macroeconomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Partha Dasgupta
Partha Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DD, UK. Tel: 44-(0)1223-335227. Fax: 44-(0)1223-335475. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A problem in urgent need of attention in modern industrial societies is to discover ways to de-link aggregate output from recorded employment. If the loss were shared in a manner deemed fair by the general public, there would be nothing catastrophic for people in a country where the average income is 35,000 international dollars a year to suffer an income loss of even 25 per cent, let alone 5 per cent. Average income in the UK in 1990 was about 25 per cent less than in 2005. It's hard to maintain that UK citizens experienced significantly lower levels of personal wellbeing in 1990 than they did in 2005. Revival of research on competitive consumption (e.g., Veblen's ‘conspicuous consumption’) and reports on ‘life satisfaction’ suggest that a general rise in private consumption among a population enjoying a high standard of living adds little to happiness, or indeed to objectively measured indices of wellbeing.

Type
Forum
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 3: Special Issue of Environment and Development Economics: Looking Back and Moving Forward , June 2014 , pp. 307 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, S. (1994), ‘Self-enforcing international environmental agreements’, Oxford Economic Papers 46(3): 878–894.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (2003), Environment & Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2004), Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Ehrlich, P. (2013), ‘Pervasive externalities at the population, consumption, and environment nexus’, Science 340(6130): 324–328; doi:10.1126/science.1224664.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Heal, G. (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Goettle, R., Ho, M., and Wilcoxen, P. (2013), Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the US, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C.I. (2004), Introduction to Economic Growth, 2nd edn, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Hassan, R., Scholes, R., and Ash, N. (eds) (2005a), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, I: Current State and Trends, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Carpenter, S.R., Pingali, P.L., Bennet, E.M., and Zurek, M.B. (eds) (2005b), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, II: Scenarios, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Chopra, K., Leemans, R., Kumar, P., and Simmons, H. (eds) (2005c), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, III: Policy Responses, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Capistrano, D., Samper, C.K., Lee, M.J., and Raudsepp-Hearne, C. (eds) (2005d), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, IV: Multiscale Assessments, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Southerton, D. and Ulph, A. (eds) (2014, forthcoming), Sustainable Consumption: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E. and Greenwald, B. (2014, forthcoming), Creating a Learning Society: A New Paradigm for Development and Social Progress, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bank, World (1992), World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment, Washington, DC and Oxford: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar