Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:33:17.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meta-analysis of FDI and environmental regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Alief A. Rezza
Alief A. Rezza*
Affiliation:
Norwegian School of Economics, Helleveien 30, 5045 Bergen, Norway. Tel: +47 55959349. Fax: +47 55959543. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous authors have been unable to agree on whether environmental regulations hinder foreign direct investment (FDI). The empirical evidence in this domain remains inconclusive because of the contrasting results observed in the literature, owing to the differing characteristics of the data sets and models used in previous studies. The present study carries out a meta-analysis on a sample of published and unpublished papers on the so-called pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) in order to investigate whether certain aspects of research design affect the presented findings. The paper offers explanations for the mixed findings reported in the literature by suggesting that certain aspects of research design are crucial to explaining their significance. The PHH is more likely to be supported by studies that define FDI as the establishment of new plants and those that use government spending as a proxy for the strictness of environmental regulations. Moreover, focusing investigations on pollution-intensive industries or developing countries hardly increases the likelihood of achieving results that support the PHH.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 185 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., and Taylor, S. (2001), ‘Is free trade good for the environment?’, American Economic Review 91: 877–908.Google Scholar
Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E., and Rietveld, P. (2005), ‘A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand: a SUR approach’, Energy Economics 30: 2105–2122.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A. and Elliott, R.J.R. (2005), ‘FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle’, Review of Development Economics 9(4): 530–548.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A. and Fredriksson, P.G. (2009), ‘Institutionalized pollution havens’, Ecological Economics 68(4): 1239–1256.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., and Okubo, T. (2010), ‘Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: an industry-level study of Japan’, Ecological Economics 69(10): 1995–2002.Google Scholar
Dam, L. and Scholtens, L.J.R. (2008), ‘Environmental regulation and MNEs location: does corporate social responsibility matter?’, Ecological Economics 67: 55–65.Google Scholar
Dean, J.M., Lovely, M.E., and Wang, H. (2009), ‘Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China’, Journal of Development Economics 90(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Di, W. (2007), ‘Pollution abatement cost savings and FDI inflows to polluting sectors in China’, Environment and Development Economics 12(6): 775–798.Google Scholar
Drukker, D. and Millimet, D.L. (2008), ‘Assessing the pollution haven hypothesis in an interdependent world’, [Available at] http://www.cbpp.illinois.edu/pdf/Millimet_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Ederington, J., Levinson, A., and Minier, J. (2005), ‘Footloose and pollution-free’, Review of Economics and Statistics 87(1): 92–99.Google Scholar
Elliott, R.J.R. and Shimamoto, K. (2008), ‘Are ASEAN countries havens for Japanese pollution-intensive industry?’, World Economy 31(2): 236–254.Google Scholar
Eskeland, G.S. and Harrison, A.E. (2003), ‘Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis’, Journal of Development Economics 70(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P.G., List, J.A., and Millimet, D.A. (2003), ‘Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound US FDI: theory and evidence’, Journal of Public Economics 87(2): 1407–1430.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., Gerlowski, D.A., and Silberman, J. (1992), ‘What attracts foreign multinational cooperations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States’, Journal of Regional Science 32: 403–418.Google Scholar
Glass, G.V. (1976), ‘Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research’, Educational Researcher 5: 3–8.Google Scholar
Javorcik, B.S. and Wei, S. (2004), ‘Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth?’ Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 3(2): 1244–1244.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, T., List, J.A., and Folmer, H. (2002), ‘Environmental regulation and new plant location decisions: evidence from a meta-analysis’, Journal of Regional Science 42(1): 19–49.Google Scholar
Keller, W. and Levinson, A. (2002), ‘Environmental regulations and FDI inflows to U.S. states’, Review of Economics and Statistics 84(4): 691–703.Google Scholar
Kheder, S.B. and Zugravu, N. (2008), ‘The pollution haven hypothesis: a geographic economy model in a comparative study’, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No 73, Milan.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, C. and Shimamoto, K. (2008), ‘The effect of environmental regulation on the locational choice of Japanese foreign direct investments’, Applied Economics 30(11): 1399–1409.Google Scholar
Kukenova, M. and Monteiro, J. (2008), ‘Does lax environmental regulation attract FDI when accounting for “third-country” effects?’, [Available at] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1292705.Google Scholar
Levinson, A. and Taylor, M.S. (2008), ‘Unmasking the pollution haven effect’, International Economic Review 49(1): 223–254.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. (2001), Practical Meta-Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
List, J.A. (2001), ‘US county-level determinants of inbound FDI: evidence from a two-step modified count data model’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(6): 953–973.Google Scholar
List, J.A. and Co, C.Y. (2000), ‘The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Ljungwall, C. and Linde-Rahr, M. (2005), ‘Environmental policy and the location of foreign direct investment in China’, Working Paper No. E 009, China Center for Economic Research, Beijing.Google Scholar
MacDermott, R. (2009), ‘A panel study of the pollution-haven hypothesis’, Global Economy Journal 9(1): Art. 2.Google Scholar
Manderson, E. and Kneller, R. (2011), ‘Environmental regulations, outward FDI and heterogeneous firms: are countries used as pollution havens?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 51(3): 317–352.Google Scholar
McGuire, M.C. (1982), ‘Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade’, Journal of Public Economics 17(3): 335–354.Google Scholar
Mıhçı, H., Cagatay, S., and Koska, O. (2005), ‘The impact of environmental stringency on the foreign direct investments of the OECD countries’, International Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 7(4): 679–703.Google Scholar
Mulatu, A., Florax, R.J.G.M., and Withagen, C.A.A.M. (2004), ‘Environmental regulation and competitiveness: a meta-analysis of international trade studies’, in Löschl, A. (ed.), Empirical Modelling of the Economy and the Environment, Berlin: Physica Verlag, pp. 23–35.Google Scholar
Nelson, J.P. and Kennedy, P.E. (2009), ‘The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment’, Environmental and Resource Economics 42(3): 345–377.Google Scholar
Porter, M. (1991), ‘America's green strategy’, Scientific American 264(4): 168.Google Scholar
Porter, M. and van der Linde, C. (1995), ‘Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118.Google Scholar
Ratnayake, R. and Wydeveld, M. (1998), ‘The multinational corporation and the environment: testing the pollution haven hypothesis’, Economics Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Auckland, Auckland.Google Scholar
Rauscher, M. (2005), ‘International trade, foreign investment, and the environment’, in Mäler, K.G. and Vincent, J.R. (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1403–1456.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, R.S. and Loomis, J.B. (2000), ‘Panel stratification in meta-analysis of economic studies: an investigation of its effects in the recreation valuation literature’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32(1): 131–149.Google Scholar
Spatareanu, M. (2007), ‘Searching for pollution havens’, Journal of Environment and Development 16(2): 161–182.Google Scholar
Stanley, T.D. and Jarrell, S.B. (1989), ‘Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys’, Journal of Economic Surveys 3: 161–170.Google Scholar
Tole, L. and Koop, G. (2011), ‘Do environmental regulations affect the location decisions of multinational gold mining firms?’, Journal of Economic Geography 11(1): 151–177.Google Scholar
Van Houtven, G., Powers, J., and Pattanayak, S.K. (2007), ‘Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis?’, Resource and Energy Economics 29: 206–228.Google Scholar
Wagner, U.J. and Timmins, C. (2009), ‘Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis’, Environmental and Resource Economics 43(2): 231–256.Google Scholar
Waldkirch, A. and Gopinath, M. (2008), ‘Pollution control and foreign direct investment in Mexico: an industry-level analysis’, Environmental and Resource Economics 41(3): 289–313.Google Scholar
Xing, Y. and Kolstad, C. (2002), ‘Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 21(1): 1–22.Google Scholar