Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:43:14.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting greener by going black: the effect of blacklisting municipalities on Amazon deforestation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

Juliano Assunção  and
Romero Rocha
Juliano Assunção*
Affiliation:
Climate Policy Initiative Rio de Janeiro (CPI Rio) & Núcleo de Avaliação de Políticas Climáticas da PUC-Rio (NAPC/PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Department of Economics, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Romero Rocha
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2008, the Brazilian government blacklisted municipalities in the Amazon to better target efforts to repress deforestation. Not only were law enforcement and monitoring activities intensified, but also economic sanctions and political pressures were imposed on those municipalities. We use a differences-in differences approach to compare deforestation reduction in blacklisted municipalities and non-blacklisted municipalities. We find that: (i) the blacklisting has significantly reduced deforestation; and (ii) this effect was primarily driven by the monitoring and law enforcement channel – there is no effect on agricultural production or credit concessions.

Keywords

Deforestationmonitoringpriority municipalitiesQ23Q24Q28
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 115 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S and Robinson, JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development : an empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91, 1370–1401.Google Scholar
Anderson, E and Talley, W (1995) The oil spill size of tanker and barge accidents: determinants and policy implications. Land Economics 71, 216–228.Google Scholar
Andrade, L (2016) Spillover effects of blacklisting policy in the brazilian amazon. MA thesis, USP Economics.Google Scholar
Antle, JM and Heidebrink, G. (1995) Environment and development: theory and international evidence. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43, 604–625.Google Scholar
Arima, EY, Barreto, P, Araújo, E and Soares-Filho, B (2014) Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: lessons and challenges from brazil. Land Use Policy 41, 465–473.Google Scholar
Arrow, K, Bolin, B, Costanza, R, Dasgupta, P, Folke, C, Holling, CS, Jansson, B, Levin, S, Maler, K, Perrings, C and Pimentel, D (1996) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Applications 6, 13–15.Google Scholar
Assunção, J, Gandour, C and Rocha, R (2012) Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: prices or policies? CPI/NAPC working paper.Google Scholar
Assunção, J, Gandour, C and Rocha, R (2013) DETERring deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: environmental monitoring and law enforcement. CPI/NAPC working paper.Google Scholar
Börner, J, Kis-Katos, K, Hargrave, J and König, K (2015) Post-crackdown effectiveness of field-based forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0121544.Google Scholar
Brito, B (2009) Multas Pós-Operação Curupira no Mato Grosso. Technical report, Imazon.Google Scholar
Brito, B and Barreto, P (2008) Enforcement against iIlegal logging in the Brazilian Amazon.Google Scholar
Brito, B, Souza, C Jr and Amaral, P (2010) Reducing Emissions from Deforestation at Municipal Level: A Case Study of Paragominas, chapter 8. Brasil: Defra, British Embassy Brasilia.Google Scholar
Chomitz, K and Thomas, T (2003) Determinants of land use in Amazônia: a fine-scale spatial analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 1016–1028.Google Scholar
Cisneros, E, Zhou, SL and Börner, J (2015) Naming and shaming for conservation: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136402.Google Scholar
Cropper, M and Griffiths, C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. The American Economic Review 84, 250–254. Papers and proceedings of the hundred and sixth annual meeting of the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Earnhart, D and Segerson, K (2012) The influence of financial status on the effectiveness of environmental enforcement. Journal of Public Economics 96, 670–684.Google Scholar
Eckert, H (2004) Inspections, warnings, and compliance: the case of petroleum storage regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, 232–259.Google Scholar
Epple, D and Visscher, M (1984) Environmental pollution: modeling occurrence, detection and deterrence. Journal of Law and Economics 27, 29–60.Google Scholar
Foster, A and Rosenzweig, M (2003) Economic growth and the rise of forests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 601–637.Google Scholar
Gray, WB and Shadbegian, R (2005) When and why do plants comply? Paper mills in the 1980s. Law and Policy 27, 238–261.Google Scholar
Gray, WB and Shimshack, JP (2011) The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: a review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Enconomics and Policy 5, 3–24.Google Scholar
Grossman, GM and Krueger, AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353–377.Google Scholar
Hargrave, J and Kis-Katos, K (2013) Economic causes of deforestation in the brazilian amazon: a panel data analysis for the 2000s. Environmental and Resource Economics 54, 471–494.Google Scholar
Herrera, D (2015) Spillover conservation around protected areas in the brazilian amazon: frontier dynamics and variation in nearby deforestation blockage (reverse leakage). Chapter 1 in PhD thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Hirakuri, S (2003) Can Law Save the Forest? Lessons from Finland and Brazil. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
INPE (2013) Projeto PRODES – Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite. Database, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais.Google Scholar
Kaika, D and Zervas, E (2013) The environmental kuznets curve (ekc) theory. part a: concept, causes and the co2 emissions case. Energy Policy 62, 1392–1402.Google Scholar
Magat, W and Viscusi, WK (1990) Effectiveness of the epa's regulatory enforcement: the case of industrial effluent standards. Journal of Law and Economics 33, 331–360.Google Scholar
Maia, H, Hargrave, J, Gómez, JH and Röper, M (2011) Avaliação do Plano de Ação para a Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento da Amazônia Legal, 2007–2010. Technical report, Ipea, GIZ and Cepal.Google Scholar
Matsuura, K and Willmott, C (2012) Terrestrial precipitation: 1900–2010 gridded monthly time series (1900–2010) (v 3.01 added 6/14/12). University of Delaware. http://climate.geog.udel.edu/climate/.Google Scholar
MMA (2012) Brazilian policy to tackle deforestation in the Amazon. In Rio+20 United Nations conference on sustainable development. Ministério do Meio Ambiente.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T (1995) Environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. In Ahmed, I and Doeleman, JA (eds), Beyond Rio: The The Environmenatl Crisis and Sustainable livelihoods in the Third World. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A (1999) What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 26–43.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A, Robalino, J, Walker, R, Aldrich, S, Caldas, M, Reis, E, Perz, S, Bohrer, C, Arima, E, Laurance, W and et al. . (2007) Road investments, spatial spillovers, and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Regional Science 47, 109–123.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A, Robalino, J, Lima, E, Sandoval, C and Herrera, LD (2014) Governance, location and avoided deforestation from protected areas: greater restrictions can have lower impact, due to differences in location. World Development 55, 7–20.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A, Robalino, J, Herrera, D and Sandoval, C (2015) Protected areas? impacts on Brazilian Amazon deforestation: examining conservation? Development interactions to inform planning. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0129460.Google Scholar
Plassmann, F and Khanna, N (2006) Preferences, technology, and the environment: understanding the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88, 632–643.Google Scholar
Ranjan, R and Shortle, J (2007) The environmental Kuznets curve when the environment exhibits hysteresis. Ecological Economics 64, 204–215.Google Scholar
Reis, E and Guzmán, R (1994) An Econometric Model of Amazon Deforestation. In Brown, K and Pearce, D (eds), The Causes of Tropical Deforestation. London: UCL Press, pp. 172–191.Google Scholar
Reis, E and Margulis, S (1991) Options for Slowing Amazon Jungle Clearing. In Dornbusch, R and Poterba, JM (eds), Global Warming: Economic Policy Responses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 335–375.Google Scholar
Robalino, J, Pfaff, A and Villalobos, L (2015) Deforestation spillovers from Costa Rican protected areas. LACEEP working paper series WP78.Google Scholar
Selden, TM and Song, D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 147–162.Google Scholar
Shimshack, J and Ward, MB (2005) Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50, 519–540.Google Scholar
Sills, EO, Herrera, D, Kirkpatrick, AJ, Brandão, AJR, Dickson, R, Hall, S, Pattanayak, S, Shoch, D, Vedoveto, M, Young, L and Pfaff, A (2015) Estimating the impacts of local policy innovation: the synthetic control method applied to tropical deforestation. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132590.Google Scholar
Stern, DI and Common, MS (2001) Is there an environmental kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162–178.Google Scholar
Stern, DI, Common, MS and Barbier, EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 24, 1151–1160.Google Scholar
Yandle, B, Vijayaraghavan, M and Bhattarai, M (2002) The environmental kuznets curve, a primer. PERC Research Study 2, 1–24.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Assunção and Rocha supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Assunção and Rocha supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 179.9 KB