Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:39:26.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fisheries subsidies and potential catch loss in SIDS Exclusive Economic Zones: food security implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

U. Rashid Sumaila ,
Andrew Dyck  and
William W.L. Cheung
U. Rashid Sumaila
Affiliation:
Fisheries Economics Research Unit, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1E4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Andrew Dyck
Affiliation:
Fisheries Economics Research Unit, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
William W.L. Cheung
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the effects of providing subsidies to the fisheries in small island developing states (SIDS), where fisheries are important to both the food security and livelihoods of the populations. By analyzing data on current and potential catch and computing the potential catch losses from the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of SIDS, we find that, collectively, SIDS have currently overfished their waters to the extent that their current catch is just under 50 per cent of the maximum catch potential. This catch loss results in direct and indirect food security impacts in terms of losses in healthy, varied and nutrient-rich food, revenues, incomes and economic impacts in SIDS. Our results also demonstrate that capacity-enhancing subsidies contribute to overfishing while the effect of good subsidies is unclear and needs further analysis.

Type
Special Section on Biodiversity-based development in Small Island Developing States
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 427 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, E.H., Perry, A.L., Badjeck, M.-C., et al. (2009), ‘Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries’, Fish and Fisheries 10: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APEC (2000), ‘Study into the nature and extent of subsidies in the fisheries sector of APEC member economies’, PricewaterhouseCoopers Report No. CTI 07/99T, PwC, London.Google Scholar
Cheung, W.W.L., Lam, V.W.Y., Sarmiento, J.L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., Zeller, D., and Pauly, D. (2010), ‘Large-scale redistribution of maximum catch potential in the global ocean under climate change’, Global Change Biology 16: 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., Munro, G., and Sumaila, U.R. (2005), ‘Subsidies, buybacks, and sustainable fisheries’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50: 47–58.Google Scholar
Dyck, A.J. and Sumaila, U.R. (2010), ‘Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery’, Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 227–243.Google Scholar
FAO (1992), ‘Marine fisheries and the law of the sea: a decade of change’, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 853, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (2001), ‘Report on the expert consultation on economic incentives and responsible fisheries’, Paper presented to the Committee on Fisheries, 24th session, Fisheries FAO Fisheries Report No. 638, Suppl., FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (2009), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Froese, R. and Kesner-Reyes, K. (2002), ‘Impact of fishing on the abundance of marine species’, ICES Council Meeting Report No. CM 12/L:12, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.A. and Reynolds, J.D. (2004), ‘Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk’, BioScience 54(4): 297–309.Google Scholar
Khan, A., Sumaila, U.R., Watson, R., Munro, G., and Pauly, D. (2006), ‘The nature and magnitude of global non-fuel fisheries subsidies’, in Sumaila, U.R. and Pauly, D. (eds), Catching More Bait: A Bottom-up Re-estimation of Global Fisheries Subsidies, Fisheries Centre Research Reports 14(6): 1–34, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Milazzo, M. (1998), ‘Subsidies in world fisheries: a re-examination’, World Bank Technical Paper No. 406, Fisheries series, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, G., and Sumaila, U.R. (2002), ‘The impact of subsidies upon fisheries management and sustainability: the case of the North Atlantic’, Fish and Fisheries 3: 233–250.Google Scholar
Myers, R.A. and Worm, B. (2003), ‘Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities’, Nature 432: 280–283.Google Scholar
OECD (2004), Review of Fisheries in OECD Countries, Country Statistics 2000–2002, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
OECD (2005), ‘Subsidies: a way towards a sustainable fisheries?’, Policy Brief, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2010), Review of Fisheries in OECD Countries 2009: Policies and Summary Statistics, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T.J., Sumaila, U.R., Walters, C.J., Watson, R., and Zeller, D. (2002), ‘Towards sustainability in world fisheries’, Nature 418: 689–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, U., Cheung, W., Watson, R., and Sumaila, U.R. (2010), ‘Food security implications of global marine catch losses due to overfishing’, Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 183–200; doi:10.1007/s10818-010-9090-9.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R. and Cheung, W.W.L. (2009), ‘Vulnerability and sustainability of marine fish stocks worldwide: with emphasis on fish stocks of the Commonwealth of Nations’, in Bourne, R. and Collins, M. (eds), From Hook to Plate: The State of Marine Fisheries – A Commonwealth Perspective, London: Commonwealth Foundation, pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R., Marsden, D., Watson, R., and Pauly, D. (2007), ‘Global ex-vessel fish price database: construction and applications’, Journal of Bioeconomics 9: 39–51.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R., Khan, A., Dyck, A.J., Watson, R., Munro, G., Tyedmers, P., and Pauly, D. (2010), ‘A bottom up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies’, Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 201–225.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R., Cheung, W.W.L., Dyck, A., et al. (2012), ‘Benefits of rebuilding global marine fisheries outweigh costs’, PLoS ONE 7(7), e40542; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040542.Google Scholar
World Bank and FAO (2008), The Sunken Billions. The Economic Justification for Fisheries Reform, Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank.Google Scholar
Worm, B., Barbier, E.B., Beaumont, N., et al. (2006), ‘Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services’, Science 314: 787–790.Google Scholar
WWF (2001), ‘Hard facts, hidden problems: a review of current data on fishing subsidies’, WWF Technical Paper, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar