Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:12:05.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Fair’ policies for the coffee trade – protecting people or biodiversity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

MITRI KITTI ,
JAAKKO HEIKKILÄ  and
ANNI HUHTALA
MITRI KITTI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Helsinki School of Economics, Arkadiankatu 7, 00100 Helsinki. E-mail: [email protected]
JAAKKO HEIKKILÄ
Affiliation:
MTT Economic Research, Luutnantintie 13, 00410 Helsinki. E-mail: [email protected]
ANNI HUHTALA
Affiliation:
MTT Economic Research, Luutnantintie 13, 00410 Helsinki. E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the role that economic instruments can play in promoting economic sustainability and the preservation of biodiversity in agroforestry management in coffee production. Most of the world's coffee producers live in poverty and manage agro-ecosystems in regions that are culturally and biologically among the most diverse on the globe. Despite the relatively recent finding that bees may augment pollination and boost coffee crop yields, the short-term revenues from intense monoculture drive land-use decisions that destroy the forest strips serving as habitats for pollinating insects. Our study investigates whether farmers specialize in environmentally detrimental (sun-grown) or sustainable (shade-grown) farming, or both practices coexist. We calibrate an empirical model to characterize the equilibria and investigate the ecological and economic impacts of three alternative policy instruments: conservation fees, price premiums, and minimum wages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 739 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agne, S. (2000), ‘The impact of pesticide taxation on pesticide use and income in Costa Rica's coffee production’, Special Issue Publication Series, No. 2. Universität Hannover. Available at http://www.ifgb1.uni-hannover.de/ppp/ppp_s02.pdf.Google Scholar
Bacon, C. (2005), ‘Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua?’, World Development 33: 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez, P.C., Kuosmanen, T., Olschewski, R., and van Kooten, G.C. (2006), ‘Conservation payments under risk: a stochastic dominance approach’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D., Plaza Sanchez, J.L., and Murphy, E.C. (2002), ‘Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: lessons for eco-labeling initiatives’, Society and Natural Resources 15: 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D.B. and Merino-Pérez, L. (2002), ‘The rise of community forestry in Mexico: history, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production’, A Report in partial fulfillment of Grant No. 1010-0595, The Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Bulte, E.H. and Horan, R.D. (2003), ‘Habitat conservation, wildlife extraction and agricultural expansion’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damodaran, A. (2002), ‘Conflict of trade-facilitating environmental regulations with biodiversity concerns: the case of coffee-farming units in India’, World Development 30: 1123–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicum, G. and Luttinger, N. (1999), The Coffee Book: Anatomy of an Industry from Crop to the Last Drop, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2005), ‘http://faostat.fao.org’.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P.J. and Kiss, A. (2002), ‘Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, policy forum: ecology’, Science 298: 1718–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P.J. and Simpson, R.D. (2002), ‘The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments’, Land Economics 78: 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P.J., Uchida, T., and Conrad, J.M. (2005), ‘Price premiums for eco-friendly commodities: are “green” markets the best way to protect endangered ecosystems?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindling, T. and Terrell, K. (2005), ‘The effect of minimum wages on actual wages in the formal and informal sectors in Costa Rica’, World Development 33: 1905–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobbi, J. (2000), ‘Is biodiversity-friendly coffee financially viable? An analysis of five different coffee production systems in western El Salvador’, Ecological Economics 33: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICAFE website (2006), ‘http://www.icafe.go.cr/homepage.nsf’.Google Scholar
Kilian, B., Jones, C., Pratt, L., and Villalobos, A. (2006), ‘Is sustainable agriculture a viable strategy to improve farm income in Central America? A case study of coffee’, Journal of Business Research 59: 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, B., Pratt, L., Villalobos, A., and Jones, C. (2004), ‘Can the private sector be competitive and contribute to development through sustainable agricultural business? A case study of coffee in Latin America’, A paper presented at the 14th Annual World Food and Agribusiness Forum, Symposium and Case Conference, 12–15 June 2004, Montreux, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Tscharntke, T. (2003)a, ‘Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae)’, American Journal of Botany 90: 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Tscharntke, T. (2003)b, ‘Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees’, Proceedings of the Royal Society London B B 270: 955–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Tscharntke, T. (2003)c, ‘Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management’, Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 837–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C. and Ricketts, T.H. (2000), ‘Global perspectives on pollination disruptions’, Conservation Biology 14: 1226–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C., Williams, N.M., and Thorp, R.W. (2002), ‘Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 16812–16816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lall, S., Selod, H., and Shalizi, Z. (2006), ‘Rural-urban migration in developing countries: a survey of theoretical predictions and empirical findings’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, p. 3915.Google Scholar
Lustig, N. and McLeod, D. (1997), ‘Minimum wages and poverty in developing countries: some empirical evidence’, in Edwards, S. and Lustig, N. (eds.), Labor markets in Latin America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Méndez, V.E.S., Gliessman, S.R., and Gilbert, G.S. (2007), ‘Tree biodiversity in farmer cooperatives of a shade coffee landscape in western El Salvador’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119: 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moguel, P. and Toledo, V.M. (1999), ‘Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico’, Conservation Biology 13: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninan, K.N. and Sathyaplan, J. (2005), ‘The economics of biodiversity conservation: a study of a coffee-growing region in the Western Ghats of India’, Ecological Economics 55: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olschewski, R., Tscharntke, T., Benítez, P.C., Schwarze, S., and Klein, A.-M. (2006), ‘Economic evaluation of pollination services comparing coffee landscapes in Ecuador and Indonesia’, Ecology and Society 11: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., Mas, A., and Pinto, L.S. (2005), ‘Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification’, Ecological Economics 54: 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynolds, L., Murray, D., and Taylor, P.L. (2004), ‘Fair trade coffee: building producer capacity via global networks’, Journal of International Development 16: 1262–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, P. and McLean, J. (1999), ‘Sustainable coffee at the crossroads’, A White Paper Prepared for the Consumer's Choice Council, Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.E., and Michener, C.D. (2004), ‘Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 12579–12582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roubik, D.W. (2002), ‘The value of bees to the coffee harvest: brief communications’, Nature 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedjo, R.A. and Swallow, S.K. (2002), ‘Voluntary eco-labeling and the price premium’, Land Economics 78: 272–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T. (1999), ‘Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set’, Oecologia 121: 432–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swallow, S.K. and Sedjo, R.A. (2000), ‘Eco-labeling consequences in general equilibrium: a graphical assessment’, Land Economics 76: 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swart, J.A. (2003), ‘Will direct payments help biodiversity? Letters to the editor’, Science 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varangis, P., Siegel, P., Giovannucci, D., and Lewin, B. (2003), ‘Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America – impacts and strategies’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kitti supplementary material

Appendices.pdf

Download Kitti supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 114.5 KB