Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:21:14.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental and population externalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

FRANK JÖST  and
MARTIN F. QUAAS
FRANK JÖST
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimerstrasse 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: [email protected]
MARTIN F. QUAAS
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Kiel, Wilhelm-Seelig-Platz 1, 24118 Kiel, Germany. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze the external effects that arise in the decisions of firms on polluting emissions and in the decisions of parents on the number of births in an optimal control model with three stock variables representing population, economic capital, and pollution. We distinguish two different types of households, which represent opposite ends of a spectrum of potential familial structures: ‘dynastic households’, in which the family sticks together forever and ‘micro-households’, in which children leave their parent's household immediately after birth. We show that the decision of parents on the number of births involves an externality that is qualitatively different for both types of familial structure. Hence, population policy should be different, according to the type of household. A first best result may be obtained in the case of dynastic households if an appropriate tax on the household size is applied, or, in the case of micro-households, if an appropriate tax on children is applied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronsson, T., Johansson, P., and Lögren, K. (1997), Welfare Measurement, Sustainability and Green National Accounting – A Growth Theoretical Approach, New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Kurz, M. (1970), Public Investment, The Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy, Baltimore, MD: Resources for the Future, John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Barro, R.J. and Becker, G.S. (1989), ‘Fertility choice in a model of economic growth’, Econometrica 57 (2): 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. and Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1960), ‘An Economic Analysis of Fertility’, in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 209–231.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S., Glaeser, E.L., and Murphy, K.M. (1999), ‘Population and economic growth’, AEA Papers and Proceedings 89 (2): 145–149.Google Scholar
Cronshaw, M.B. and Requate, T. (1997), ‘Population size and environmental quality’, Journal of Population Economics 10: 229–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasgupta, P. (2000), ‘Population and resources: an exploration of reproductive and environmental externalities’, Population and Development Review 26 (4): 643–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. and Ehrlich, A.H. (2002), ‘Population, development, and human resources’, Envrionment and Development Economics 7: 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D.N. (1999), ‘From malthusian stagnation to modern growth’, AEA Papers and Proceedings 89 (2): 150–154.Google Scholar
Harford, J.D. (1997), ‘Stock pollution, child-bearing externalities, and the social discount rate’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harford, J.D. (1998), ‘The ultimate externality’, American Economic Review 88 (1): 260–265.Google Scholar
Heilig, G.K. (1996), ‘How many people can be fed on Earth?’, in Lutz, W. (ed), The Future Population of the World. What Can We Assume Today, London: Earthscan (revised and updated edition).Google Scholar
Joos, F., Müller-Fürstenberger, G., and Stephan, G. (1999), ‘Correcting the carbon cycle representation: how important is it for the economics of climate change’, Environmental Modeling Assessment 4: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, P. (1982), ‘On the transversality condition in infinite horizon optimal problems’, Econometrica 50 (4): 975–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moslener, U. and Requate, T. (2007), ‘Optimal abatement in dynamic multi-pollutant problems when pollutants can be complements or substitutes’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31: 2293–2316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerlove, M. (1991), ‘Population and the environment: a parable of firewood and other tales’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (5): 1334–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nerlove, M. and Meyer, A. (1997), ‘Endogenous fertility and the environment: a parable of firewood’, in Dasgupta, P. and Mäler, K.-G. (eds), The Environment and Emerging Development Issues, Oxford: Clarendon Press, chapter 10, pp. 259–282.Google Scholar
Pethig, R. (2006), ‘Non-linear production, abatement, pollution and materials balance reconsidered’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 (2): 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raut, L.K. and Srinivasan, T. (1994), ‘Dynamics of endogenous growth’, Economic Theory 4: 791–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razin, A. and Sadka, E. (1995), Population Economics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.A. and Srinivasan, T. (1997), ‘Long-term consequences of population growth: technological change, natural resources, and the environment’, in Rosenzweig, M.R. and Stark, O. (eds), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, chapter 21, pp. 1175–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, A. (ed) (1998), Ecology and the Crisis of Overpopulation – Future Prospects for Global Sustainablility, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
United Nations (2007), ‘World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision’, Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, New York.Google Scholar
Weil, P. (1989), ‘Overlapping families of infinitely-lived agents’, Journal of Public Economics 38: 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2003), ‘World Development Indicators on CD-ROM’.Google Scholar
Yip, C.K. and Zhang, J. (1997), ‘A simple endogenous growth model with endogenous fertility: indeterminacy and uniqueness’, Journal of Population Economics 10: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed