Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:17:42.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emissions scenarios, costs, and implementation considerations of REDD-plus programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

JAYANT SATHAYE ,
KENNETH ANDRASKO  and
PETER CHAN
JAYANT SATHAYE
Affiliation:
MS 90-4000, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Email: [email protected]
KENNETH ANDRASKO
Affiliation:
Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. Email: [email protected]
PETER CHAN
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from the forestry sector are estimated to be 8.4 GtCO2-eq./year or about 17% of the global emissions. We estimate that the cost for reducing deforestation is low in Africa and several times higher in Latin America and Southeast Asia. These cost estimates are sensitive to the uncertainties of how much unsustainable high-revenue logging occurs, little understood transaction and program implementation costs, and barriers to implementation including governance issues. Due to lack of capacity in the affected countries, achieving reduction or avoidance of carbon emissions will require extensive REDD-plus programs. Preliminary REDD-plus Readiness cost estimates and program descriptions for Indonesia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, Guyana and Mexico show that roughly one-third of potential REDD-plus mitigation benefits might come from avoided deforestation and the rest from avoided forest degradation and other REDD-plus activities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 4: REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION (REDD) , August 2011 , pp. 361 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anger, N. and Sathaye, J. (2008), ‘Reducing deforestation and trading emissions: economic implications for the post-Kyoto carbon market’, Report LBNL-63746, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez-Ponce, P.C., McCallum, I., Obersteiner, M., and Yamagata, Y. (2007), ‘Global potential for carbon sequestration: geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications’, Ecological Economics 60: 572–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, J., Strassburg, B., Cattaneo, A., Lubowski, R., Bruner, A., Rice, R., Creed, A., Ashton, R., and Boltz, F. (2009), ‘Comparing climate and cost impacts of reference levels for reducing emissions from deforestation’, Environmental Research Letters 4:044006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (2008), Australia's Low Pollution Future: The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation, available at http://www.treasury.gov.au/lowpollutionfuture/report/html/00_Preliminaries.aspGoogle Scholar
Contreras-Hermosilla, A. (2001), ‘Forest law enforcement: an overview’, Working Papers Series, World Bank Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Daviet, F., Davis, C., Goers, L., and Nakhooda, S. (2009), ‘Ready or not? A review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership R-Plans and the UN REDD Joint Program Documents’, Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ebeling, J. and Yasue, A. (2008), ‘Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation, and human development benefits’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 1917–1924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliasch, J. (2008), Climate Change: Financing Global Forests. The Eliasch Review, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
FAO (2005), State of the World's Forests, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO (2007), State of the World's Forests, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FCPF (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility) (2008), ‘Cost of achieving readiness’, World Bank, Washington, DC, [Online], http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp, FCPF Meetings/The Readiness Fund/ PA1/PC1, October 19–22, 2008, Washington, DC/ Other Presentations.Google Scholar
FIP Expert Group (2010), ‘Report of FIP Expert Group: Recommendations for Pilots under the FIP’, Climate Investment Funds, FIP/SC.3/6, March 3, 2010, [Online], http://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/workingdocuments/1024Google Scholar
Hansen, M.C., Stehman, S.V., Potapov, P.V., Loveland, T.R., Townshend, J.R.G., DeFries, R.S., Pittman, K.W., Arunarwati, B.A., Stolle, F., Steininger, M.K., Carroll, M., and DiMiceli, C. (2008), ‘Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified using multi-temporal and multi-resolution remotely sensed data’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (27): 9439–9444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A. (2003), ‘Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000’, Tellus Series B Chemical and Physical Meteorology 55 (2): 378–390.Google Scholar
IFCA (2008), Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Indonesia. REDD Methodologies and Strategies. Summary for Policy Makers, Indonesia Forest Climate Alliance, [Online], http://redd.pbworks.com/f/REDDI+SUmmarry+for+Policy+Makers.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kishore, N. and Belle, A. (2004), ‘Does improved governance contribute to sustainable forest management?’, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 19 (1/2/3): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livengood, E. and Dixon, A. (2009), REDD and the effort to limit global warming to 2°C: Implications for including REDD credits in the international carbon market, KEA3, New Zealand prepared for Greenpeace International, [Online] http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/redd-and-the-effort-to-limit-g.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meridian Institute (2009), Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Report, Prepared for the Government of Norway, pp. 42.Google Scholar
Myers Madeira, E., Coren, M.J., and Streck, C. (2010), ‘The feasible supply of RED credits: less than predicted by technical models’, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nabuurs, G.J., Masera, O., Andrasko, K., Benitez-Ponce, P., Boer, R., Dutschke, M., Elsiddig, E., Ford-Robertson, J., Frumhoff, P., Karjalainen, T., Krankina, O., Kurz, W.A., Matsumoto, M., Oyhantcabal, W., Ravindranath, N.H., Sanz Sanchez, M.J., and Zhang, X. (2007), ‘Forestry’, in Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L.A. (eds), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D., Soares-Filho, B., Merry, F., Moutinho, P., Rodrigues, H. Oliveira, Bowman, M., Schwartzman, S., Almeida, O., and Rivero, S. (2007), ‘The costs and benefits of reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon’, Woods Hole Research Center, pp. 26.Google Scholar
Ravindranath, N.H., Chaturvedi, R.K., Joshi, N.V., Sukumar, R., and Sathaye, J. (2010). ‘Implications of climate change on mitigation potential estimates for forest sector in India’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, DOI: 10.1007/s11027-010-9256-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, W., Allen, E., and Callahan, M. (2006), ‘Illegal logging: A market-based analysis of trafficking in illegal timber’, unpublished Report, US Department of Justice, [Online], http://www.illegal-logging.info/uploads/traffiking_analysis.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rose, S.K. and Sohngen, B. (2011), ‘Global forest carbon sequestration and climate policy design’, Environment and Development Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathaye, J., Chan, P., Dale, L., Makundi, W., and Blum, H. (2008), ‘Updating carbon density and opportunity cost parameters in deforesting regions in the GCOMAP model’, UNT Digital Library, available at http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc13711/Google Scholar
Sathaye, J., Makundi, W., Dale, L., Chan, P., and Andrasko, K. (2005), ‘Estimating global forestry GHG mitigation potential and costs: a dynamic partial equilibrium approach’, Formal Report LBNL-55743, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathaye, J., Makundi, W., Dale, L., Chan, P., and Andrasko, K. (2006), ‘GHG mitigation potential, costs and benefits in global forests: a dynamic partial equilibrium approach’, The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue: 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Obidzinki, K., Subarudi, , and Suramenggala, I. (2003), ‘Illegal logging, collusive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia’, International Forestry Review 5 (3): 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Sedjo, R. (2006), ‘Carbon sequestration costs in global forests’, Energy Journal, Special Issue: 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Werf, G.R., Morton, D.C., DeFries, R.S., Olivier, J.G.J., Kasibhatla, P.S., Jackson, R.B., Collatz, G.J., and Randerson, J.T. (2009), ‘CO2 emissions from forest loss’, Nature Geoscience 2: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar