Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:23:35.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of household contributions to collective irrigation management: The case of the Doho Rice Scheme in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

YUKO NAKANO  and
KEIJIRO OTSUKA
YUKO NAKANO
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Email: [email protected]
KEIJIRO OTSUKA
Affiliation:
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) and the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to explore the conditions for successful communal irrigation management, this study investigates the determinants of household contributions to the cleaning of irrigation channels and the availability of water. By using household-level data collected in a large-scale gravity irrigation scheme in Uganda, whose management was transferred from the government to the community, we find that household contributions to the cleaning of irrigation channels are determined by the scarcity of irrigation water, the opportunity cost of labor and the private benefit associated with plot size. We also find that the availability of irrigation water increases in the tertiary irrigation canal where the coefficient of variation of plot size is large, which may indicate that farmers of larger plots are particularly active in water management. These findings suggest that farmers are responsive to private benefits and, hence, the support of the government for communities to implement punishment may be effective for successful irrigation management.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 527 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baland, J.M. and Platteau, J.P. (1996), Halting the Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P. (2000), ‘Irrigation and cooperation: an empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in south India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 48 (4): 847–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, P., Ghatak, M., and Karaivanov, A. (2007), ‘Inequality and collective action’, in Baland, J.M., Bardhan, P. and Bowles, S. (eds), Inequality, Cooperation, and Environmental Sustainability, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, E.W. Jr. (1980), Irrigation and Agricultural Development in Asia, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dayton-Johnson, J. (2000), ‘Determinants of collective action on the local commons: a model with evidence from Mexico’, Journal of Development Economics 62 (1): 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiie, M., Hayami, Y., and Kikuchi, M. (2005), ‘The conditions of collective action for local commons management’, Agricultural Economics 33 (2): 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garces-Restrepo, C., Vermillion, D., and Muñoz, G. (2007), ‘Irrigation management transfer: worldwide efforts and results’, FAO Water Report No. 32, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Gaspart, F., Jabbar, M., Mélard, C., and Platteau, J. P. (1998), ‘Participation in the construction of a local public good with indivisibilities: an application to watershed development in Ethiopia’,Journal of African Economies 7 (2): 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, J. (2003), ‘Food security for sub-Saharan Africa: does water scarcity limit the options?’, Land Use and Water Resources Research 3: 2.1–2.7.Google Scholar
Gyasi, K.O. (2005), Determinants of Success of Collective Action on Local Commons: An Empirical Analysis of Community-Based Irrigation Management in Northern Ghana, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y. and Otsuka, K. (1993), The Economics of Contract Choice: An Agrarian Perspective, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T., Kijima, Y., and Yamano, T. (2006), ‘The role of local non-farm activities and migration in reducing poverty: evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda’, Agricultural Economics 35 (suppl 3): 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K.V., and Gulati, A. (2002), ‘What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation system in India’, World Development 30 (4): 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y. (2009), ‘Irrigation management in the Doho Rice Scheme in Uganda: an inquiry into the potential of a Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Ph.D. thesis, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. and Zeckhauser, R. (1966), ‘An economic theory of alliances’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 48 (3): 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons – The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabright, P. (1993), ‘Managing local commons: theoretical issues in incentive design’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (4): 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, R. and Somanathan, E. (2006), ‘A simple model of collective action’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 54 (3): 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachibana, T., Upadhyaya, H.K., Pokharel, R., Rayamajhi, S., and Otsuka, K. (2001), ‘Common property forest management in the hill region of Nepal’, in Otsuka, K. and Place, F. (eds), Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management: A Comparative Study of Agrarian Communities in Asia and Africa, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Vermillion, D.L. (1997), ‘Impacts of irrigation management transfer: a review of evidence’, Research Report No. 11, International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
Wade, R. and Chambers, R. (1980), ‘Managing the main system: canal irrigation's blind spot’, Economic and Political Weekly 15 (39): A107–A112.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Xu, Z., Huang, J., and Rozelle, S. (2005), ‘Incentives in water management reform: assessing the effect on water use, production, and poverty in the Yellow River Basin’, Environment and Development Economics 10 (6): 769–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.A. and Runge, C.F. (1994), ‘Common property and collective action: lessons from cooperative watershed management in Haiti’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.A. and Runge, C.F. (1995), ‘The emergence and evolution of collective action: lessons from watershed management in Haiti’, World Development 23 (10): 1683–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar