Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:31:37.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of economic performance for coastal managed areas in central-southern Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

CATTERINA SOBENES  and
CARLOS CHÁVEZ
CATTERINA SOBENES
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Environmental Engineering and Natural Resources, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Alonso de Ribera 2850, Concepción, Chile. Telephone: 56-41-2735316, Fax: 56-41-2735300. Email: [email protected]
CARLOS CHÁVEZ
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Universidad de Concepción, P.O. Box 1987, Concepción, Chile. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the economic performance of Benthic Resource Management Areas (BRMAs) in central-southern Chile. The analysis considers 26 managed areas with Agreements of Use declaring Chilean abalone (Concholepas concholepas) to be the main exploited benthic resource from 2001 to 2003. Our analysis explores the role played by several characteristics thought to be potential BRMA performance determinants. These variables were defined and grouped into four types: economic, environmental–biological, institutional–organizational, and organizational leader. Our results indicate that the price of Chilean abalone, the size of the habitable area, the target resource density, the density of other resources, and leader experience are determinant factors for the economic performance of the BRMAs under study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 717 - 738
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antinori, C. and Rausser, G. (2003), ‘Does community involvement matter? How collective choice affects forest in Mexico’, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UCB, CUDARE Working Paper 939, http://repositories.cdlib.org/are_ucb/939.Google Scholar
Baland, J. and Platteau, J. (2003), ‘Economics of common property management regimes’, in Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 129–190.Google Scholar
Belfiore, S., Balgos, M., Galofre, J., McLean, B., Blaydes, M., and Tesch, D. (2002), ‘The role of indicators in integrated coastal management’, International Workshop, background paper, Centre for the Study of Marine Policy.Google Scholar
Bustamante, R. and Castilla, J. (1987), ‘The shellfishery in Chile: an analysis of 26 years of landings (1960–1985)’, Revista Biología Pesquera 16: 79–97.Google Scholar
Bustos, E., González, A., and Ponce, F. (1991), ‘Repoblación de recursos bentónicos: Mecanismos de recuperación de poblaciones sobreexplotadas’, Rev. Pacífico Sur. 19: 35–37 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Castilla, J. (1990), ‘Clase magistral: la importancia y proyección de la investigación de ciencias del mar en Chile’, Revista Biología Marina 25: 1–18 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Castilla, J. C. and Fernández, M. (1998), ‘Small-scale benthic fisheries in Chile: on comanagement and sustainable use of benthic invertebrates’, Ecological Applications 8 (sp1): S124–S132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cereceda, L. and Czischke, D. (2001), ‘Nueva modalidad institucional para el desarrollo sustentable del sector pesquero artesanal’, Revista Ambiente y Desarrollo, June: 40–49 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Cordah, L. (2001), ‘Indicators to monitor the progress of integrated coastal zone management: a review of worldwide practice’, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, Central Research Unit, 2001.Google Scholar
Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (FIP) (2008), Final Report for FIP Project 2003–18, November 2005, http://www.fip.cl, Revised: 3 December 2005.Google Scholar
González, E. (1996), ‘Thalassorama: territorial use rights in Chilean fisheries’, Marine Resource Economics 11: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. (1998), Análisis econométrico, Tercera edición, Prentice Hall (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (1979), ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heltberg, R. (2001), ‘Determinants and impact of local institutions for common resource management’, Economics and Development Economics 6: 183–208.Google Scholar
Jeréz, G. (2001), ‘El concepto de área de manejo como base para la conservación de los recursos bentónicos y su aporte a la biodiversidad marina costera chilena’, in Alveal, K. and Antezana, A. (eds.), Sustentabilidad de la biodiversidad: Un problema actual. Bases científico-técnicas, teorizaciones y proyecciones, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, pp. 855–868 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Kaliba, A. (2002), ‘Participatory evaluation of community-based water and sanitation programs: the case of central Tanzania’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, Agriculture College, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Kamara, A., Koppen, B., and Magingxa, L. (2001), ‘Economic viability of small-scale irrigation systems in the context of state withdrawal: the Arabia Scheme in the Northern Province of South Africa’, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 815–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. (2003), ‘Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives’, Ocean and Coastal Management 46: 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1993), ‘Esquemas institucionales para el manejo exitoso de recursos comunes’, Gaceta Ecológica (Nueva Época) 45: 32–48 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1995), ‘Designing complexity to govern complexity’, in Hanna, S. and Munasinghe, M. (eds.), Property Rights and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues, The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and the World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Gardner, R. (1993), ‘Coping with asymmetries in the commons: self-governing irrigation systems can work’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, M. and Chávez, C. (2006), ‘Normas y Cumplimiento en Áreas de Manejo de Recursos Bentónicos: Estudio de Casos en la región del Bío-Bío’, Revista Estudios Públicos 103: 237–276 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Platteau, J. and Abraham, A. (2002), ‘Participatory development in the presence of endogenous community imperfections’, Journal of Development Studies 39: 104–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollnac, R., Crawford, B., and Sukmara, A. (2002), ‘Community-Based Resource Management: An Interim Assessment of the Poyek Pesisir Field Site in Bentenan and Tumbak Villages, North Sulawesi, Indonesia, Technical Report TE-02/01-E, University of Rhode Island, Coastal Resources Center, Narrangansett Rhode Island, USA, pp. 57.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. S. and Carlos, M. B. (1997), ‘Community-based coastal resource management in the Philippines: a review and evaluation of programs and projects, 1984–1994’, Marine Policy 21: 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, R., Pollnac, R., Katon, B., and Predo, C. (1997), ‘Evaluating factors contributing to the success of community-based coastal resource management: the Central Visayas regional Project-1, Philippines’, Ocean and Coastal Management 36: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subsecretaría de Pesca (SUBPESCA) (1995), ‘Reglamento sobre Áreas de Manejo y Explotación de Recursos Bentónicos No. 355’, Ministerio de Economía Fomento y Reconstrucción, http://www.subpesca.cl/template/tablas_chicas/04.asp?idseccion=256, revised 4 February 2005.Google Scholar
Sumalde, Z. and Pedroso, S. (2001), ‘Transaction costs of a Community-Based Coastal Resource Management Program in San Miguel Bay Philippines’, EEPSEA, Research Report, Department of Economics, College of Economics and Management, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (1987), The Possibility of Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar