Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:44:05.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratization, environmental and income inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

Laura Policardo
Laura Policardo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If the demand for environmental goods is increasing with income, democratization shifts the decisive power from a rich autocrat to a poorer individual (decisive voter), so it should be associated with worse environmental conditions. In this paper, it is shown through a theoretical model that: (i) democratization may have mixed effects on the level of environmental quality, depending on the size of the price and income effects on the demand for environmental quality associated with a decrease in the decisive political actor's wealth; and (ii) assuming that society is composed of two classes of individuals with different levels of exposure to pollution, and assuming moreover that the decisive voter belongs to the most exposed class of individuals while the autocrat does not, democratization is beneficial for the environment, and the better the effect on the environment, the bigger the difference in wealth between the two decisive political actors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 813 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, B. (1992), ‘The gender and environment debate: lessons from India’, Feminist Studies 18(1): 119–158.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. and Graddy, K. (2000), ‘Freedom, growth and the environment’, Environment and Development Economics 54: 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, M. and Hammig, M. (2001), ‘Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a cross country analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia’, World Development 29(6): 995–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, J. (2007), ‘Inequality and environmental protection’, in Baland, J.-M., Bardhan, P. and Bowles, S. (eds), Inequality, Cooperation and Environmental Sustainability, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Congleton, R.D. (1992), ‘Political institutions and pollution control’, Review of Economics and Statistics 74(3): 412–421.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Mäler, K.-G. (1995), ‘Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base’, in Behrman, J. and Srinivaan, T.N. (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 3A, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Chapter 39.Google Scholar
De Esteban, A. and Loṕez Loṕez, A. (1993), ‘Environmental policy’, in Barbado, M. (ed.), Spain and EC Evaluated, London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
Desai, U. (1998), Ecological Policy and Politics in Developing Countries: Economic Growth, Democracy, and Environment, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Farzin, Y.H. and Bond, C.A. (2006), ‘Democracy and environmental quality’, Journal of Development Economics 81(1): 213–235.Google Scholar
Font, N. and Morata, F. (1998), ‘Spain: environmental policy and public administration. A marriage of convenience officiated by the EU?’, in Hanf, K. and Jansen, A.I. (eds), Governance and the Environment in Western Europe; Politics, Policy and Administration, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Foster, S. (1998), ‘Justice from the ground-up: distributive inequalities, grassroots resistance, and the transformative politics of the environmental justice movement’, California Law Review 86(4): 775–841.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P.G. and Wollscheid, J.R. (2007), ‘Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: the case of environmental policy’, Public Choice 130(3): 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, K.P. and Thacker, S.C. (2008), ‘Democracy, income and environmental quality’, Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) Working Paper No. 164, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, N.P. and Sverdrup, B. (2003), ‘Democracy and the environment’, in Paper, E. and Redclift, M. (eds), Human Security and the Environment: International Comparisons, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gray, W.B. and Shadbegian, R.J. (2004), ‘Optimal pollution abatement – whose benefits matter, and how much?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(3): 510–534.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1995), ‘Economic growth and the environment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., and Wilson, D.M. (2002), ‘Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve’, Review of Economics and Statistics 84(3): 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R. (1972), ‘Growth and survival’, Foreign Affairs 51(1): 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hökby, S. and Söderqvist, T. (2001), ‘Elasticities of demand andwillingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden’, Beijer Discussion Paper series No. 137, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kao, C. (1999), ‘Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data’, Journal of Econometrics 90(1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriström, B. and Riera, P. (1996), ‘Is the income elasticities of environmental improvements less than one?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 7(1): 45–55.Google Scholar
Leslie, W.J. (1987), The World Bank and Structural Transformation in Developing Countries: The Case of Zaire, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S. (1999), ‘A comparative study of unit root test with panel data and a new simple test’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61(Suppl. 1): 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (2009), ‘Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1-2006 AD’, updated March 2009, [Available at] http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/.Google Scholar
Marland, G., Boden, T.A., and Andres, R.J. (2008), ‘Global, regional, and national CO2 emissions’, in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Oak Ridge, TN: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Martini, C. and Tiezzi, S. (2010), ‘Is the environment a luxury? An empirical investigation using revealed preferences and household production’, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica No. 599, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Miles, D., Pereyra, A., and Rossi, M. (2002), ‘The consistent estimation of income elasticity of environmental amenities in Uruguay’, Estudios Economicos 17(1): 67–89.Google Scholar
Moya Pons, F. (1995), The Dominican Republic: A National History, Princeton, NJ: MarkusWeiner.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. (2002), ‘Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis’, Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 139–164.Google Scholar
Ophuls, W. (1974), ‘The scarcity society’, Harper's 248(1487): 47–52.Google Scholar
Pastor, M.J., Sadd, J., and Hipp, J. (2001), ‘Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice’, Journal of Urban Affairs 23(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Payne, R.A. (1995), ‘Freedom and the environment’, Journal of Democracy 6(3): 41–55.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1993), ‘Would economic democracy decrease the amount of public bad?’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95(2): 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, C.B. and Crockett, T.R. (1990), ‘Economic development, democratization, and environmental protection in Eastern Europe’, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 18(1): 53–84.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (1998), ‘Political and economic inequality and the environment’, Ecological Economics 26(3): 259–275.Google Scholar
Selden, T.M. and Song, D. (1994), ‘Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27(2): 147–162.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (2004), ‘The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve’, World Development 32(8): 1419–1439.Google Scholar
Torras, M. and Boyce, J.K. (1998), ‘Income, inequality and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve’, Ecological Economics 25(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Policardo supplementary materials

Appendix

Download Policardo supplementary materials(PDF)
PDF 88.4 KB