Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:43:57.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The deforestation-income relationship: evidence of deforestation convergence across developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Boka Stéphane Kévin Assa Open the ORCID record for Boka Stéphane Kévin Assa [Opens in a new window]
Boka Stéphane Kévin Assa*
Affiliation:
Economic Policy Analysis Unit of CIRES (CAPEC), University Felix Houphouet Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of forest conservation in the fight against emissions from deforestation and forest degradation has led to reexamination of the deforestation and economic development relationship. For this purpose, we use the recent method of long-term growth rate developed by Stern et al. (2017) on 85 tropical developing countries over the period 1990–2010. Results show that the EKC is not significant. However, we find a beta convergence across developing countries in terms of deforestation per capita. In other words, these countries converge in terms of policies that prevent deforestation and forest degradation. This implies that, just as with growth effects, beta convergence effects are also important in explaining changes in forest cover in tropical developing countries. The convergence effect in forest cover change may be consistent with the forest transition hypothesis.

Keywords

convergencedeforestationEnvironmental Kuznets curveincomelong-run growth rate

JEL classification

Q23: Forestry Q56: Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth O44: Environment and Growth
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 131 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldy, JE (2006) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence? Environmental & Resource Economics 33, 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A (2007) Forest cover change in space and time: combining the von Thünen and forest transition theories. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, Z, Burke, PJ, Gerlagh, R and Stern, DI (2014) Modeling the emissions–income relationship using long-run growth rates. CCEP Working Paper No. 1403. Centre for Climate and Economic Policy, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Arcand, JL, Guillaumont, P and Jeanneney, SG (2008) Deforestation and the real exchange rate. Journal of Development Economics 86, 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulisi, A, Sauer, A and Wellington, F (2008) Trees in the Greenhouse: Why Climate Change Is Transforming the Forest Products Business. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Azomahou, T and Van, PN (2007) Nonlinearities and heterogeneity in environmental quality: an empirical analysis of deforestation. Journal of Development Economics 84, 291–309.Google Scholar
Barbier, EB (2004) Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86, 1347–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, EB, Burgess, JC and Grainger, A (2010) The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy 27, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, RJ and Sala-i-Martin, X (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, M and Hammig, M (2001) Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a cross-country analysis for Latin America, Africa, and Asia. World Development 29, 9953–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimonte, S (2002) Information access, income distribution, and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 41, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breusch, TS and Pagan, AR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47, 1287–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, WA and Taylor, MS (2010) The Green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth 15, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, Y-B (2012) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve in developing countries: a panel smooth transition regression approach. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, M and Griffiths, C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. American Economic Review 82, 250–254.Google Scholar
Culas, R (2007) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: an institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 61, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P and Mäler, K-G (1995) Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base. In Behrman, J and Srinivasan, TN (eds), Handbook of Developmental Economics, vol. 3A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2371–2463.Google Scholar
de Bruyn, SM and Heintz, RJ (2002) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. In van den Bergh, JCJM (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Oxford, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 656–677.Google Scholar
DeFries, R, Rudel, T, Uriarte, M and Hansen, M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience 3, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrhardt-Martinez, K, Crenshaw, EM and Jenkins, JC (2002) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Social Science Quarterly 83, 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, PR and Holdren, JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science (New York, N.Y.) 171, 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment, Main report. FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-i1757e.pdf.Google Scholar
Farzin, YH and Bond, CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics 81, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, GM and Krueger, AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, GM and Krueger, AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, AC (1976) Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 44, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, SB and Saatchi, SS (2007) Globalization and forest resurgence: changes in forest cover in El Salvador. BioScience 57, 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henders, S, Persson, UM and Kastner, T (2015) Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters 10, 125012. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrerias, MJ (2013) The environmental convergence hypothesis: carbon dioxide emissions according to the source of energy. Energy Policy 61, 1140–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanninen, M, Murdiyarso, D, Seymour, F, Angelsen, A, Wunder, S and German, L (2007) Do Trees Grow on Money? The Implications of Deforestation Research for Policies to Promote REDD. Bogor, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).Google Scholar
Kastner, T, Erb, K-H and Nonhebel, S (2011) International wood trade and forest change: a global analysis. Global Environmental Change 21, 947–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kijima, M, Nishide, K and Ohyama, A (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: a survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1187–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, G and Tole, L (1999) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? Journal of Development Economics 58, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, LC, Liu, JL, Long, HX, de Jong, W and Youn, YC (2017) Economic globalization, trade and forest transition – the case of nine Asian countries. Forest Policy and Economics 76, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, CM (2002) The environmental Kuznets curve and satiation: a simple static model. Environment and Development Economics 7, 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, R (1994) The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, AS (1992) The forest transition. Area 24, 367–379.Google Scholar
Mather, AS (2007) Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. International Forestry Review 9, 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, KE (1997) Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environment and Development Economics 2, 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordas Criado, C, Valente, S and Stengos, T (2011) Growth and pollution convergence: theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panayotou, T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, ILO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T (1997) De-mystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics 2, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polomé, P and Trotignon, J (2016) Amazonian deforestation, environmental Kuznets curve and deforestation policy: a cointegration approach. Working Paper 1608, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X (1996) The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal 106, 1019–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafik, N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46, 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, IM (2006) Trade and environmental policy: a race to the bottom? Journal of Agricultural Economics 57, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanski, R (2013) On the mechanics of the Green Solow model. OxCarre Working Papers 047, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Stern, DI (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve: a primer. CCEP Working Paper 1404, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Stern, DI, Gerlagh, R and Burke, PJ (2017) Modeling the emissions–income relationship using long-run growth rates. Environment and Development Economics 22, 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strazicich, MC and List, JA (2003) Are CO2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Environmental and Resource Economics 24, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torras, M and Boyce, JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollebergh, HRJ, Melenberg, B and Dijkgraaf, E (2009) Identifying reduced form relations with panel data: the case of pollution and income. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M (2008) The carbon kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics. Resource and Energy Economics 30, 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerlund, J and Basher, SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environmental and Resource Economics 40, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, HA (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Resources Institute (WRI) (2008) Trees in the greenhouse: why climate change is transforming the forest products business. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Xu, J, Yang, Y, Fox, J and Yang, X (2007) Forest transition, its causes and environmental consequences: empirical evidence from yunnan of southwest China. Tropical Ecology 48, 137–150.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Assa Supplementary Materials

Assa Supplementary Materials

Download Assa Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 442.5 KB