Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:45:25.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China's industrial SO2 emissions and its economic determinants: EKC's reduced vs. structural model and the role of international trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

JIE HE
JIE HE*
Affiliation:
Départment d'Economique and GREDI, Faculté d'Administration, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boulevard Université, Sherbrooke J1K 2R1, Québec, Canada. Tel: 1-819-821-8000 ext 62360. Fax: 1-819-821-7934. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis for the case of China's industrial SO2 emissions: both its reduced form and structural model are considered. The EKC curve for China's per capita industrial SO2 emissions predicts the turning point at 10,000 yuan (3,085 US$, Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)). However, given China's fast population expansion, the decreasing trend in per capita emissions may well not be enough to bring about an immediate reduction in terms of total industrial SO2 emissions and emissions density. Using the structural EKC model makes it possible to reveal how various factors contribute to the industrial SO2 emissions density – namely, the three commonly known structural determinants and the marginal impact of international trade. International trade proves to have a two-fold impact: a significantly negative direct one and an indirect one that is dependent on the current capital–labour abundance ratio and on the income level of each province.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 227 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agras, J. and Chapman, D. (1999), ‘A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis’, Ecological Economics 28: 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. and Levinson, A. (2001), ‘The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Public Economics 80: 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J.M. and Heidebrink, G. (1995), ‘Environment and development: theory and international evidence’, Economic Development and Cultural Changes 43: 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (1998), ‘Is free trade good for the environment?’, NBER Working Paper No. 6707.Google Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (2001), ‘Is free trade good for the environment?’, American Economic Review 91: 877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. and Bond, S.R. (1991), ‘Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations’, Review of Economics Studies 58: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balestra, P. and Nerlove, M. (1966), ‘Pooling cross-section and time series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: the demand for natural gas’, Econometrica 34: 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. and Graddy, K. (2000), ‘Freedom, growth and the environment’, Environment and Development Economics 5: 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, M. and Hammig, M. (2001), ‘Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia’, World Development 29: 995–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R.T., Jeon, Y., and McCubbin, D. (1997), ‘The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US Data’, Environmental and Development Economics 2: 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. (1994) ‘North–South trade and the global environment’, American Economic Review 84: 851–874.Google Scholar
China Energy Databook Version 6.0, http://china.lbl.gov/china_policy-ced.html, Energy Analysis Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A. (2004), ‘Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: examining the linkage’, Ecological Economics 48: 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M.A. and Elliott, R.J.R. (2003), ‘Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46: 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B. and Taylor, M.S. (1994), ‘North–South trade and the environment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (August): 755–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B. and Taylor, M.S. (1997), ‘A simple model of trade, capital mobility and the environment’, NBER, No. 5898.Google Scholar
Cropper, M. and Griffith, C. (1994), ‘The interaction of population growth and environmental quality’, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 84: 250–254.Google Scholar
de Groot, H.L.F., Withagen, C.A., and Zhou, M. (2004), ‘Dynamics of China's regional development and pollution: an investigation into the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Environment and Development Economics 9: 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., and Pal, M. (2000), ‘Air quality and economic growth: an empirical study’, Ecological Economics 34: 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedl, B. and Getzner, M. (2003), ‘Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy’, Ecological Economics 45: 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangadharan, L. and Valenzuela, M.R. (2001), ‘Interrelationships between income, health and the environment: extending the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis’, Ecological Economics 36: 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. (1999), Econometric Analysis, International Edition (Version IV), New York University: Prentice-Hall International Inc.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. (1995), ‘Pollution and growth: what do we know?’, in Goldin, and Winter, (eds), The Economics of Sustainable Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Krueger, A. (1995), ‘Economic growth and the environment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Krueger, A. (1991), ‘Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement’, NBER No. 3914.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R., Davidsdottir, B., Garnham, S., and Pauly, P. (1998), ‘The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Ecological Economics 25: 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, N. (2002), ‘The income elasticity of non-point source air pollutants: revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Economics Letters 77: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, G. and Tole, L. (1999), ‘Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation?’, Journal of Development Economics 58: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriström, B. and Rivera, P. (1996), ‘Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 7: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindmark, M. (2002), ‘An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden, 1870–1997’, Ecological Economics 42: 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J.A. and Gallet, C.A. (1999), ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve: does one size fit all?’, Ecological Economics 31: 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, R. (1994), ‘The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalisation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnani, E. (2000), ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve: environmental protection policy and income distribution’, Ecological Economics 32: 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K. (1997), ‘Income and the demand for environmental quality’, Environmental and Development Economics 2: 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munasinghe, M. (1999), ‘Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunnelling through the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Ecological Economics 19: 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilanjana, R. and Cornelis van Kooten, G. (2004), ‘Another look at the income elasticity of non-point source air pollutants: a semiparametric approach’, Economics Letters 85: 17–22.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T. (1997), ‘Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: turning a black box into a policy tool’, Environmental and Development Economics 2: 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pethig, R. (1976), ‘Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2: 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca, J., Padilla, E., Farré, M., and Galletto, V. (2001), ‘Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussion the environmental Kuznets hypothesis’, Ecological Economics 39: 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, T.M. and Song, D. (1994), ‘Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, T.M. and Song, D. (1995), ‘Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29: 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEPA (State Environmental Protection Agency, PRC) (1986–1997), China Environmental Yearbook, Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.Google Scholar
SEPA (State Environmental Protection Agency, PRC) (1998–2002), China Environmental Statistic Yearbook, Beijing.Google Scholar
Sevestre, P. and Trognon, A. (1996), ‘Dynamic linear models’, in Matyas, L. and Sevestre, P. (eds), The Econometrics of Panel Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, chapter 7.Google Scholar
Shafik, N. (1994), ‘Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis’, Oxford Economic Papers 46: 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SSB (State Statistical Bureau, PRC) (1989–2001), China Statistical Yearbook, Beijing: China Statistical Publishing house.Google Scholar
Stern, D.I. (2004), ‘The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, World Development 32: 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D.I. and Common, M.S. (2001), ‘Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., Common, M.S., and Barbier, E.B. (1996), ‘Economic growth and environmental degradation: the Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development’, World Development 24: 1151–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suri, V. and Chapman, D. (1998), ‘Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Ecological Economics 25: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taskin, F. and Zaim, Q. (2000), ‘Searching for a Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency using kernel estimation’, Economics Letters, 68: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torras, M. and Boyce, J.K. (1998), ‘Income, inequality and pollution: a reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Ecological Economics 25: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J.R. (1997), ‘Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curves within a developing country’, Environmental and Development Economics 2: 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1996a), ‘China: Chongqing Industry Pollution Control and Reform Project’, Staff Appraisal Report, Washington DC.Google Scholar
World Bank (1996b), China: Issues and Options in Health Financing, China and Mongolia Department, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (1999), ‘Productivity and efficiency in China's regional economics’, in Tsu-Tan, Fu et al. (eds), Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Asian-Pacific Region, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Gao, J., Dockery, D.W., and Chen, Y. (1994), ‘Air pollution and daily mortality in residential area of Beijing, China’, Archives of Environmental Health 49: 216–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed