Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:45:20.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbon-reducing innovation as the essential policy frontier – towards finding the ways that work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Frank J. Convery
Frank J. Convery*
Affiliation:
Environmental Policy, University College, Dublin EnvEcon Decision Support, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Finding the ways that work to deliver the innovation needed should be given parity of esteem with getting the prices right as a focus of the economics profession and policy systems. Learn from experience as regards carbon pricing and carbon-reducing innovation; insights from the latter coming mainly from the US, China and Europe; demographically relatively small countries – Denmark (wind) and Australia (solar PV) – can make outsize contributions. A carbon price ceiling is too low to drive innovation; generating carbon-reducing innovation requires that it be explicitly recognized as a priority, and nurtured accordingly: identify the priority area(s) where innovation at scale will be necessary to make progress; baseline the elements of the innovation ecosystem which are already in place, and the gaps that need to be filled. Key elements include institutions and incentives that promote innovation, a research and enterprise community that make it happen, and a supportive public.

Keywords

carbon reductionclimateinnovationpolicy

JEL classification

Q55: Technological Innovation Q54: Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming H21: Efficiency • Optimal Taxation O54: Latin America • Caribbean
Type
Policy Discussion
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 26 , Special Issue 3: Climate Change: Emerging Issues and New Challenges for Economic Development , June 2021 , pp. 261 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, RA, Zavala-Araiza, D, Lyon, DR, Allen, DT, Barkley, ZR, Brandt, AR, Davis, KJ, Herndon, SC, Jacob, DJ, Karion, A, Kort, EA, Lamb, BK, Lauvaux, T, Maasakkers, JD, Marchese, AJ, O'Mara, M, Pacala, SW, Peischl, J, Robinson, AL, Shepson, PB, Sweeney, C, Townsend-Small, A, Wofsy, SC and Hamburg, SP (2018) Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science (New York, N.Y.) 361, 186–188.Google ScholarPubMed
Barbieri, N, Ghisetti, C, Gilli, M, Marin, G and Nicolli, F (2016) A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys 30, 596–623.10.1111/joes.12149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghesi, S, Cainelli, G and Mazzanti, M (2015a) Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Resource Policy 44, 669–683.10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghesi, S, Crespi, F, D'Amato, A, Mazzanti, M and Silvestri, F (2015b) Carbon abatement, sector heterogeneity and policy responses: evidence on induced eco innovations in the EU. Environmental Science and Policy 54, 377–388.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citigroup (2016) Disruptive innovations IV. Ten more things to stop and think about. Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions. Available at https://www.citivelocity.com/citigps/disruptive-innovations-iv/.Google Scholar
Cleantech Group (2017) 2017 Global Cleantech Innovation Index. Available at https://i3connect.com/gcii/country_rank.Google Scholar
Corradini, M, Costantini, V, Mancinelli, S and Mazzanti, M (2014) Unveiling the dynamic relation between R&D and emission abatement. National and sectoral innovation perspectives from the EU. Ecological Economics 102, 48–59.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta, A and Somanathan, E (2016) Climate policy and innovation in the absence of commitment. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 3, 917–955.10.1086/688510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecofys (2014) Subsidies and Costs of EU Energy: Final Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ECOFYS%202014%20Subsidies%20and%20costs%20of%20EU%20energy_11_Nov.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018) Communication: A Clean Planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Brussels, 28.11.2018 COM(2018) 773 final.Google Scholar
European Commission (2019) Communication: The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final.10.1016/S0306-3747(19)30232-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (n.d.) Commissioner (2019–2024): Mariya Gabriel. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/gabriel_en.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (EEA) (2020) The Sustainability Transition in Europe in an Age of Demographic and Technological Change. An Exploration of Implications for Fiscal and Financial Strategies. EEA Report No 23/2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/sustainability-transition-in-europe.Google Scholar
Feynman, R (1964) Lecture at Cornell University on the scientific method. Excerpt available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIxvQMhttq4.Google Scholar
Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF (2018) Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2018. Available at http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2018/renewable_trends.pdf.Google Scholar
Gaddy, B, Sivaram, V and O'Sullivan, F (2016) Venture capital and cleantech: the wrong model for clean energy innovation. Working Paper, MIT Energy Initiative.10.2139/ssrn.2788919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertner, J (2013) George Mitchell. The lives they lived. New York Times Magazine, December 21. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/news/the-lives-they-lived/2013/12/21/george-mitchell/.Google Scholar
Ghisetti, C, Mancinelli, SM, Zoli, M and Mazzanti, M (2017) Financial barriers, eco-innovation and complementarity in EU firms. Climate Policy 17, S131–S147.10.1080/14693062.2016.1242057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, C (2007) Lunch with the FT: Jeffrey Sachs. Financial Times Magazine, April 6. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/e79cf8b6-e185-11db-bd73-000b5df10621.Google Scholar
Gold, R (2014) The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Green, MA (1982) Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology, and System Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Green, MA (2020) Tracking solar cell conversion efficiency. Nature Reviews Physics 2, 172–173.10.1038/s42254-020-0163-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H and Segafredo, L (2014) Policies That Work: How to Build A low-Emissions Economy. San Francisco, CA: ClimateWorks Foundation. Available at https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Policies-That-Work_Overview-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Hepburn, C, Pless, J and Popp, D (2018) Encouraging innovation that protects environmental systems: five policy proposals. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 12, 154–169.10.1093/reep/rex024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackner, M, Koller, S and Camuzeaux, J (2019) Evidence and insight from reverse auctions as an instrument for delivering renewables and energy storage capacity at scale. Environmental Economics and Policy 13, 140–148.10.1093/reep/rey019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, L (2018) Revolt over high fuel prices threatens to paralyse France. Irish Times, November 16. Available at https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/revolt-over-high-fuel-prices-threatens-to-paralyse-france-1.3699287.Google Scholar
Mohlin, K, Camuzeaux, JR, Muller, A, Schneider, M and Wagner, G (2018) Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 116, 290–296.10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, E (2012) The New Geography of Jobs. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Muehlenbachs, L, Spiller, E and Timmins, C (2015) The housing market impacts of shale gas development. American Economic Review 105, 3633–3659.10.1257/aer.20140079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemet, GF (2019) How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780367136604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennings, K (2000) Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 32, 319–332.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, GB (1903) Man and Superman. A Comedy and A Philosophy. Westminster: Archibald Constable & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Sterner, T (2007) Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy 35, 3194–3202.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2019) Red Moon Rising – will China dominate science? The Economist, January 12. Available at https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/01/12/how-china-could-dominate-science.Google Scholar
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (2015) Industrial Development Report 2016. The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Vienna.Google Scholar
Wagner, G, Kåberger, T, Olai, S, Oppenheimer, M, Rittenhouse, K and Sterner, T (2015) Energy policy: push renewables to spur carbon pricing. Nature 525, 27–29.10.1038/525027aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (2019) State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/191801559846379845/pdf/State-and-Trends-of-Carbon-Pricing-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Yergin, D (2012) The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World (revised and updated). New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar