Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:41.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the potential of labelling schemes for in situ landrace conservation: an example from India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

VIJESH V. KRISHNA ,
UNAI PASCUAL  and
DAVID ZILBERMAN
VIJESH V. KRISHNA
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), CG Centre Block, NASC Complex, DP Shastri Marg, New Delhi 110012, India. Tel: +91 (0)11 25842940. Fax: +91 (0)11 25842938. Email: [email protected]
UNAI PASCUAL
Affiliation:
Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, CB39EP, Cambridge, UK. Email: [email protected]
DAVID ZILBERMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics & Giannini Foundation, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses the potential of in situ crop landrace conservation, employing market-based instruments, which pre-requires that (1) consumers hold positive use-value for the landrace attribute and (2) their willingness to pay covers both the transaction cost of implementing these instruments and the opportunity cost of landrace cultivation. The empirical examination is based on two closely related analyses of eggplant production and consumption sectors of India. At present, the vegetable markets of south India provide the landrace cultivators with a price premium adequate enough to cover the opportunity cost of not opting for high-yielding modern varieties. However, we detect an underutilized consumer demand for landrace products. The wide margin that exists between the price premium farmers currently obtain for the landrace attribute and what consumers are willing to pay for it is indicative of the unexploited potential of labelling and certification schemes as an emerging agrobiodiversity conservation strategy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 127 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P.G. (1998), Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practices for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting, Cambridge: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegbeto, N.K., Manyong, V.M., Coulibaly, O., and Asiedu, R. (2008), ‘Estimating market demand for fresh yam characteristics using contingent valuation: implications for crop breeding and production choices’, Agricultural Economics 39: 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, A., Mittelhammer, R.C., and McCluskey, J.J. (2007), ‘Consumer response to information and second generation genetically modified food in India’, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 5 (1): 1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, A.K., Chau, N.H., and Grote, U. (2003), ‘Eco-labeling and stages of development’, Review of Development Economics 7 (2): 228–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, I.A., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R., and Swanson, J. (2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon, M.R. (2004), ‘Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation’, World Development 32 (1): 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon, M.R., Adato, M., Becerril, J., and Mindek, D. (2006), ‘Poor farmers’ perceived benefits from different types of maize germplasm: the case of creolization in low-land tropical Mexico’, World Development 34 (1): 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon, M.R., Pham, J.L., and Jackson, M.T. (1997), ‘Genetic conservation: a role for rice farmers’, in Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., and Hawkes, J.W. (eds), Plant Conservation: The in situ Approach, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
Berg, T., Bjørnstad, A., Fowler, C., and Skrøppa, T. (1991), ‘Technology options and the gene struggle’, Occasional Papers (Series C), NORAGRIC, Ås, Norway.Google Scholar
Biber-Klemm, S., T. Cottier, Cullet, P., and Berglas, D.S. (2005), ‘The current law of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge’, in Biber-Klemm, S., Cottier, T., and Berglas, D.S. (eds), Rights to Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, Oxfordshire: CAB International, pp. 56–111.Google Scholar
Birol, E., Rayn-Villalba, E., and Smale, M. (2008), ‘Farmer preferences for Milpa diversity and genetically modified maize in Mexico: a latent class approach’, Environment and Development Economics 14 (4): 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birol, E., Smale, M., and Gyovai, A. (2006), ‘Using a choice experiment to estimate farmers’ valuation of agricultural biodiversity on Hungarian small farms’, Environmental and Resource Economics 34 (4): 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, T.K., Kabir, J., Maity, T.K., Parthasarathy, V.A., and Som, M.G. (2002), Vegetable Crops, Kolakatta, India: Naya Prakash.Google Scholar
Brown, A.H.D. (1999), ‘The genetic structure of crop landraces and the challenge to conserve them in situ on farms’ in Brush, S.B. (ed.) Genes in the Field: On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, Rome, Ottawa, ON, Canada, and Boca Raton, FL: IDRC/IPGRI/Lewis Publishers, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Brush, S.B. (1999), ‘The issues of in situ conservation of crop genetic resources’ in Brush, S.B. (ed.) Genes in the Field: On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, Rome, Ottawa, ON, Canada, and Boca Raton, FL: IDRC/IPGRI/Lewis Publishers, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Brush, S.B. (2004), Farmers’ Bounty: Localizing Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, pp. 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, D.A., Soleri, D., and Smith, S.E. (2000), ‘A biological framework for understanding farmers’ plant breeding’, Economic Botany 54 (3): 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, T.J. (2004), ‘A household hedonic model of rice traits: economic values from farmers in West Africa’, Agricultural Economics 31 (2/3): 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunay, M.C., Lester, R.N., Hennart, J.W., and Duranton, C. (2000), ‘Eggplants: present and future’, Capsicum Eggplant Newsletter 19: 11–18.Google Scholar
Edmeades, S. (2007), ‘A hedonic approach to estimating the supply of variety attributes of a subsistence crop’, Agricultural Economics 37 (1): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1996), ‘The state of world's genetic resources for food and agriculture’, Paper presented at the Background Documentation for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, 17–23 June 1996, Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2007), available at http://faostat.fao.org/ (verified October 2009).Google Scholar
Florax, R.J.G.M., Travisi, C. M., and Nijkamp, P. (2005), ‘A meta-analysis of the willingness to pay for reductions in pesticide risk exposure’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 32 (4): 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. and Hodgkin, T. (2004), ‘Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: assessing global availability’, Annual Review of Environmental Resources 29: 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. and Mooney, P. (1990), The Threatened Gene: Food, Politics, and the Loss of Genetic Diversity, Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.Google Scholar
Gouchan, D., Smale, M., and Choudhary, P. (2005), ‘Market-based incentives for conserving diversity on farms: the case of rice landraces in Central Tarai, Nepal’, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52 (3): 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grote, U. (2002), ‘Eco-labelling in the agricultural sector: an international perspective’, Paper presented at the High-Level Pan European Conference on Agriculture and Biodiversity, 4 March 2002, European Council, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Haab, T.C. and McConnell, K.E. (2002), Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation, Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, M.J., Bouvier, R.A., and Hansen, B.E. (1997), ‘On the issue of functional form choice in hedonic price functions: further evidence’, Environmental Management 21: 759–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, S.F. and Zilberman, D. (2006), ‘Green markets, eco-certification, and equilibrium fraud’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 (3): 627–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, J.R. (1975), ‘Our vanishing genetic resources’, Science 188: 618–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IFAV (2001), Recherche: Verbraucherverhalten beim Lebensmittelkauf, Cologne, Germany: IFAV.Google Scholar
Kontoleon, A. and Yabe, M. (2006), ‘Market segmentation analysis of preferences for GM derived animal foods in the UK’, Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 4 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V.V. and Qaim, M. (2007), ‘Estimating the adoption of Bt eggplant in India: who benefits from public–private partnership?’ Food Policy 32 (5/6): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V.V. and Qaim, M. (2008a), ‘Consumer attitudes towards GM food and pesticide residues in India’, Review of Agricultural Economics 30 (2): 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V.V. and Qaim, M. (2008b), ‘Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers’ health in India’, Agricultural Economics 38 (2): 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K. (1966), ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, B.A. (2003), ‘Eco-labels for credence attributes: the case of shade-grown coffee’, Environment and Development Economics 8 (3): 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuschke, I., Mishra, R.R., and Qaim, M. (2007), ‘Adoption and impact of hybrid wheat in India’, World Development 35 (8): 1422–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, C. and Schmidt, P. (1985), ‘On the cost of partial observability in the bivariate probit model’, International Economic Review 26 (1): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, W., Florkowski, W.J., Brückner, B., and Schonhof, I. (2002), ‘Willingness to pay for environmental practices: implications for eco-labeling’, Land Economics 78 (1): 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. (1970), ‘Information and consumer behaviour’, Journal of Political Economy 78 (2): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D.D. and Zilberman, D. (1993), ‘Hedonic estimation of quality factors affecting the farm-retail margin’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poudel, D. and Johnsen, F.H. (2009), ‘Valuation of crop genetic resources in Kaski, Nepal: farmers’ willingness to pay for rice landraces conservation’, Journal of Environmental Management 90 (1): 483–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pretty, J.N. (1995), Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practices for Sustainability and Self-Reliance, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. (2003), ‘Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections’, World Development 31 (12): 2115–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy, C., Janaiah, A., Selvaraj, K.N., and Hossain, M. (2003), ‘Hybrid rice in Tamil Nadu: evaluation of farmers’ experience’, Economic and Political Weekly 38 (25): 2509–2512.Google Scholar
Scarpa, R. and Del Giudice, T. (2004), ‘Market segmentation via mixed logit: extra-virgin olive oil in Urban Italy’, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpa, R., Philippidis, G., and Spalatro, F. (2005), ‘Product–country images and preference heterogeneity for Mediterranean food products: a discrete choice framework’, Agribusiness 21 (3): 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smale, M. (1997), ‘The Green Revolution and wheat genetic diversity: some unfounded assumptions’, World Development 25 (8): 1257–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smale, M., Bellon, M.R., Jarvis, D., and Sthapit, B. (2004), ‘Economic concepts for designing policies to conserve crop genetic resources on farms’, Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution 51 (2): 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smale, M., Just, R.E., and Leathers, H.D. (1994), ‘Land allocation in HYV adoption models: an investigation of alternative explanations’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (3): 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, V., Vijay, O.P., and Naik, G. (2001), ‘Field evaluation of brinjal (Solanum spp) germplasm against shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.)’ Insect Environment 6 (4): 155–156.Google Scholar
Stavins, R.N. (2003), ‘Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments’, in Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J.R. (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics 9 (1): 355–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnevehr, L. J. (1986), ‘Consumer demand for rice grain quality and returns to research for quality improvement in South-East Asia’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (3): 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dusen, M.E. and Taylor, J.E. (2005), ‘Missing markets and crop diversity: evidence from Mexico’, Environment and Development Economics 10 (4): 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, F. (1928), ‘Quality factors influencing vegetable prices’, Journal of Farm Economics 10: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar