Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:37:04.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International transfers, price uncertainty and tropical deforestation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Erwin Bulte  and
Daan Van Soest
Erwin Bulte
Affiliation:
Department of General Economics, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Daan Van Soest
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University ofGroningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International transfers to developing countries are sometimes advocated on the ground that they contribute to tropical forest conservation. Here we demonstrate that the effectiveness (and attractiveness) of this instrument is reduced if the restrictive assumption of deterministic prices is relaxed. With stochastic prices, the steady-state forest stock in the absence of transfers is greater, implying that the marginal benefit of additional hectares conserved is less. In addition, the ‘wealth effect’ of transfers counteracts the ‘freeing-up effect’, which implies that per unit of subsidy fewer hectares of tropical forest are protected. Both effects reduce the attractiveness of transfers as a policy instrument for Western governments to combat tropical deforestation.

Type
Theory and Applications
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 281 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbier, E.B. and Rauscher, M. (1994) ‘Trade, tropical deforestation and policy in terventions’, Environmental and Resource Economics 4: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O.J. and Fischer, S. (1993) Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeprna, C.J. (1995) Tropical Deforestation: A Socio-Economic Approach, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Leland, H.E. (1972) ‘Theory of the firm facing uncertain demand’, American Economic Review 62: 278–291.Google Scholar
Lewis, T.R. (1977) ‘Attitudes towards risk and the optimal exploitation of an ex haustible resource’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D.W. and Warford, J.J. (1993) World without End: Economics and Ecology for Sustaining Tropical Forests, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Robison, L.J. and Barry, P.J. (1987) The Competitive Firm’s Response to Risk, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1971) ‘On the theory of the firm under price uncertainty’, American Economic Review 61: 65–73.Google Scholar
Varian, H.R. (1992) Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd edn, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
World Bank (1991) Price Prospects for Major Primary Commodities 1990–2005, vol. 2, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar