No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Delivery to the Customer's Door: Efficiency, Regulatory Policy, and Integrated Rail-Truck Operations, 1900–1938
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2015
Abstract
During the first third of the twentieth century, U. S. railroad executives offered local collection and delivery trucking operations. Railroad managers claimed, with justification, that these services were necessary to reduce congestion at urban freight terminals, and to increase the operating efficiency. Yet, executives also employed collection and delivery practices to discriminate against shippers and communities, and to draw business away from rival carriers, in violation of the 1887 Interstate Commerce Act, the 1903 Elkins Act, and the Transportation Act of 1920. During the 1920s, as competition from independent truckers became more intense, railroad managers used their inherent advantage in line-haul service to cross-subsidize local delivery services, to the detriment of independent motor carriers—an issue of considerable concern to Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) commissioners, following the passage of the 1935 Motor Carrier Act. The railroads' emphasis on the productive efficiency associated with local trucking operations conflicted with the allocative efficiency advocated by federal courts and by the ICC. Commissioner Joseph B. Eastman, in particular, emphasized both the potential benefits and the potential dangers associated with coordinated rail-truck service. More broadly, the status of that service, as one of the few forms of transportation that lay beyond the ICC's authority, stemmed from a complex interaction, over several decades, between all three branches of the federal government. By 1938, the ICC commissioners had concluded that the railroads' local delivery operations occupied a nebulous region between rail and truck regulation. While lawful, they did not serve as a model for post-1945 efforts to achieve integrated, multi-modal transportation services.
- Type
- Special Section on American Transportation
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2009. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.
References
Bibliography of Works Cited
Books
Berk, Gerald, Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industria! Order, 1865 to 1917. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Childs, William R., Trucking and the Public Interest: The Emergence of Federal Regulation, 1914–1940. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Condit, Carl W., The Port of New York: A History of the Rail and Terminal System from the Beginnings to Pennsylvania Station. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ely, James W. Jr., Railroads and American Law. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2001.Google Scholar
Fuess, Claude Moore, Eastman, Joseph B.: Servant of the People. New York: Columbia University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Kerr, K. Austin, American Railroad Politics, 1914–1920: Rates, Wages, and Efficiency. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel, Railroads and Regulation, 1876–1916. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Johnson, Emory Richard, and Huebner, Grover Gerhardt. Railroad Traffic and Rates, Volume 1: The Freight Service. New York: D. Appleton, 1911.Google Scholar
Johnson, Emory Richard, and Van Metre, Thurman W.. Principles ofRailroad Transportation. New York: D. Appleton, 1920.Google Scholar
Latham, Earl, The Politics of Railroad Coordination, 1933–1936. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Martin, Albro, Enterprise Denied: Origins and Decline of American Railroads, 1897–1917. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
McCollester, P., and Clarke, F.J.. Federal Motor Carrier Regulation. New York: The Traffic Publishing Company, 1935.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K., Prophets ofRegulation: Charles Francis Adams, Brandeis, Louis D., Landis, James M., Kahn, Alfred E.. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Morgan, George H., Annual Statement of the Trade and Commerce of St. Louis for the Year 1906. St. Louis, MO: R. P. Studley, 1907.Google Scholar
National Transportation Committee. The American Transportation Problem. Washington, DC: Harold G. Moulton and Associates, 1933.Google Scholar
Revell, Keith D., Building Gotham: Civic Culture and Public Policy in New York City, 1898–1938. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ripley, William Z., Railway Problems: Selections and Documents in Economics. Boston, MA: Ginn, 1907.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark H., Seely, Bruce E., and Barrett, Paul F.. The Best Transportation System in the World: Railroads, Trucks, Airlines, and American Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Lawrence S., Regulation, Organizations, and Politics: Motor Freight Policy at the Interstate Commerce Commission. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Saunders, Richard Jr., Merging Lines: American Railroads, 1900–1970. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard D., The Interstate Commerce Commission and the Railroad Industry: A HistoryofRegulatoryPolicy. New York: Praeger, 1991.Google Scholar
Wagner, W.H., A Legislative History ofthe Motor Carrier Act, 1935. Denton, MD: Rue Publishing, 1935.Google Scholar
Wallis, Richard T., The Pennsylvania Railroad at Bay: William Riley McK-een and the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Articles and Essays
Azcuenaga, Mary L., “Essential Facilities and Regulation: Court or Agency Jurisdiction?” Antitrust Law Journal
58 (1989): 879–86.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald, “Adversaries by Design: Railroads and the American State, 18871916.” Journal of Policy History
5 (1993): 335–54.Google Scholar
Carpi, Fred, “Collection and Delivery: A Short Sketch on a Growing Service and Its Salesmanship.” Mutual Magazine (December 1934): 20–21.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Dowd, Timothy J.. “The Market that Antitrust Built: Public Policy, Private Coercion, and Railroad Acquisitions, 1825–1922.” American Sociological Review
65 (October 2000): 631–57.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Dowd, Timothy J.. “Federal Motor Carrier Act.” Columbia Law Review
36 (June 1936): 945–73.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, D.T., “Albert Fink and the Pooling System.” Business History Review
34 (Spring 1960): 24–49.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert., “Regulatory Conflict in the Gilded Age: Federalism and the Railroad Problem.” Yale Law Journal
97 (May 1988): 1017–72.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Abbott B. Jr., and Sidak, J.Gregory. “Essential Facilities.” Stanford Law Review
51 (May 1999): 1187–1249.Google Scholar
Lynch, Edward S., “Railroad Pick-Up and Delivery.” Journal of Land & Public Utility Economics
14 (May 1938): 120–32.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Anthony Patrick, “The ICC, Freight Rates, and the Great Depression.” Explorations in Economic History
26 (1989): 73–98.Google Scholar
Oliver, H.C., “Co-ordinated Transport: How It Represents the Trend of the Times.” Mutual Magazine (March 1934).Google Scholar
“Regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission of Railroad Terminal Trucking Facilities.” Columbia Law Review
32 (December 1932): 137–383.Google Scholar
“Regulation of Pick-Up and Delivery Service.” Yale Law Journal
46 (June 1937): 1420–23.Google Scholar
Reiffen, David, and Kleit, Andrew N.. “Terminal Railroad Revisited: Foreclosure of an Essential Facility or Simple Horizontal Monopoly?” Journal of Law and Economics
33 (October 1990): 419–38.Google Scholar
Revell, Keith, “Cooperation, Capture, and Autonomy: The Interstate Commerce Commission and the Port Authority in the 1920s.” Journal of Policy History
12 (2000): 177–214.Google Scholar
Ripley, William Z., “Railway Rate Making in Practice.” Railroad Age Gazette. 46 (June 1909): 1311–15.Google Scholar
Thompson, Gregory L., “Misused Product Costing in the American Railroad Industry: Southern Pacific Passenger Service between the Wars.” Business History Review
63 (Autumn 1989): 510–54.Google Scholar
Thompson, Gregory L., “How Cost Misunderstanding Derailed the Pennsylvania Railroad’s Efforts to Save Its Passenger Service.” Journal of Transport History
16 (September 1995): 134–58.Google Scholar
Dissertation
Strawbridge, Kenneth R., “The Transportation of L.C.L./L.T.L. Freight by Railroad.” MA thesis, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, 1976.Google Scholar
Magazines and Newspapers
Legal Documents
Thirty-Third Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission, December 1, 1919. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O., 1919.Google Scholar
Court Cases
Long Island Rail Road Company, et al., v. New York Central Railroad Company, 281 F. 2d 379 (1960).Google Scholar
Interstate Commerce Commission Cases
Anacostia Citizens Association v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, 25 ICC 411 (1912).Google Scholar
Merchants and Manufacturers Association v Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Companyetal., 30 ICC 388 (1914).Google Scholar
Chamber of Commerce of Washington, D.C., et al., v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al., 30 ICC 446 (1914).Google Scholar
Judd & Detweiler, Incorporated v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Companyet al., 30 ICC 455 (1914).Google Scholar
Transfer in St. Louis and East St. Louis by Dray and Truck; Trap or Ferry Car Service Charges, 34 ICC 516 (1915).Google Scholar
Transfer of Freight within St. Louis and East St. Louis by Dray and Truck for and on BehalfofRailroads, 155 ICC 129 (1929).Google Scholar
Constructive and Off-track Railroad Freight Stations on Manhattan Island, N.Y., 156 ICC 205 (1929).Google Scholar
Transfer of Freight within St. Louis and East St. Louis by Dray and Truck for and on behalfofRailroads, 177 ICC 316 (1931).Google Scholar
Motor Truck Club of Massachusetts, Inc., v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 206 ICC 18 (1934).Google Scholar
Kansas City Southern Transport Company, Incorporated, Common Carrier Application, 10 MCC 221 (1938).Google Scholar
Kansas City Southern Transport Company, Incorporated, Common Carrier Application, 28 MCC 5 (1941).Google Scholar
Scott Brothers, Incorporated, Extension of Operations - Jersey City, 34 MCC 163 (1942).Google Scholar
Archival Sources
The Pennsylvania Railroad Collection (R.G. 1810), Hagley Museum and Library, Wilmington, Delaware (HML).
Google Scholar
Online Sources
Beecher, Janice A., “The All Commissioners List.” Institute of Public Utilities at Michigan State University Research Note. http://www.ipu.msu.edu/research/pdfs/All%20Commissioners%20List%20-%2007.pdf.
Google Scholar
Webb, John L., “’Then Came the Motor Truck': The Story of Trucking on the Pennsylvania.” Unpublished mss., ca. 1957, archived at http://prr.railfan.net/documents.
Google Scholar