Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:33:33.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bankers, Industrialists, and their Cliques: Elite Networks in Mexico and Brazil during Early Industrialization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Aldo Musacchio  and
Ian Read
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The historiographies of Mexico and Brazil have implicitly stated that business networks were crucial for the initial industrialization of these two countries. Recently, differing visions on the importance of business networks have arisen. In the case of Mexico, the literature argues that entrepreneurs relied heavily on an informal institutional structure to obtain necessary resources and information. In contrast, the recent historiography of Brazil suggests that after 1890 the network of corporate relations became less important for entrepreneurs trying to obtain capital and concessions, once the institutions promoted financial markets and easy entry for new businesses. Did entrepreneurs in Brazil and Mexico organize their networks differently to deal with the different institutional settings? We examine whether in Mexico businessmen relied more on networks of interlocking boards of directors and other informal arrangements to do business than in Brazil. Our hypothesis is confirmed by three related results: (1) the total number of connections (i.e., the density of the network) was higher in Mexico than Brazil; (2) in Mexico, there was one dense core network, while in Brazil we find fairly dispersed clusters of corporate board interlocks; and most importantly, (3) politicians played a more important role in the Mexican network of corporate directors than their counterparts in Brazil. Interestingly, even though Brazil and Mexico relied on very different institutional structures, both countries had similar rates of growth between 1890 and 1913. However, the dense and exclusive Mexican network might have ended up increasing the social and political tensions that led to the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920).

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 842 - 880
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Balmori, Diana. Notable Family Networks in Latin America. Chicago, 1984.Google Scholar
Brazil, Congresso Nacional, Cámara dos Deputados. Mesa da Camara dos Deputados, 1826–1982: Composiçao e relaçao de membros. Brasília, 1983.Google Scholar
Brazil, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. EstatisticasHistóricas do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, 1992.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald, and Minor, M.J., eds. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.Google Scholar
Carrington, , Meter, , John, Scott, and Wasserman, Stanley. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerutti, Mario. Burguesía y capitalismo en Monterrey. Mexico, 1983.Google Scholar
Cerutti, Mario. Burgesía, capitales e industria en el norte de Mexico. Mexico, 1992.Google Scholar
Dean, Warren. The Industrialization of São Paulo. Austin, Texas, 1969.Google Scholar
de Nooy, Wouter, Andrej, Mrvar, and Batagelj, Vladimir. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge, U.K., 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, Charles. The Last Titan: American Entrepreneurin Latin America. Stanford, Calif., 1964.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Industry and Underdevelopment: The Industrialization of Mexico, 1890–1940. Stanford, Calif., 1989.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Armando, Razo, and Maurer, Noel. The Politics ofProperty Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge, U.K., 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, Ann, and Weinert, Richard S. Brazil and Mexico: Patterns in Late Development. Philadelphia, 1992.Google Scholar
Knight, Alan. The Mexican Revolution, Vol. I: Porfirians, Liberals and Peasants. Lincoln, Nebr., 1990.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi. Insider Lending: Banks, Personal Connections, and Economic Development in Industrial New England. Cambridge, U.K., 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Robert M. Pernambuco in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937. Stanford, Calif., 1978.Google Scholar
Lewin, Linda. Politics and Parentela in Paraíba: A Case Study ofFamilyBased Oligarchy in Brazil. Princeton, N.J., 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Joseph LeRoy SãO Paulo in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937. Stanford, Calif., 1980.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Leonor, and Marichal, Carlos, eds. Banca y poder en Mèxico, 1800–1925. Mèxico, 1986.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Leonor, and Salmerón, Alicia La emisión de papel moneda en Mexico: Una larga negociación político-financiera. México, 1997.Google Scholar
Mace, M.L., Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston, 1971.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M.S., The American Corporate Network: 1904–1974. Beverly Hills, Calif., 1982.Google Scholar
Pang, Eul-Soo. Bahia in the First Brazilian Republic: Coronelismo and Oligarchies, 1889–1934. Gainesville, Fla., 1979.Google Scholar
Pelaez, Carlos Manuel, and Suzigan, Wilson. Historiamonetaria do Brasil. Brasília, 1976.Google Scholar
Pennings, J.M., Interlocking Directorates. San Francisco, 1980.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary B. Firms, Networks and Business Values: The British and American Cotton Industries since 1750. Cambridge, U.K., 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saes, Flaívio A.M. A Grande empresa de servicços puíblicos na Economia Cafeeira. Sâo Paulo, 1986.Google Scholar
Saes, Flaívio A.M. As Ferrovias de Sâo Paulo, 1870–1940. Sâo Paulo, 1981.Google Scholar
Scott, W.R., Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1992.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. Leadership in Administration. New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Sheard, Paul, ed. International Adjustment and the Japanese Firm. Canberra, Australia, 1992.Google Scholar
Triner, Gail. Banking and Economic Development: Brazil, 1889–1930. New York, 2000.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Mark. Capitalists, Caciques, and Revolution: The Native Elite and Foreign Enterprise in Chihuahua, Mexico, 1854–1911. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1984.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Windolf, Paul. Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States. Oxford, U.K., 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, John D. Minas Gerais in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937. Stanford, Calif., 1977.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon, Johnson, and Robinson, James A.. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (Dec. 2001): 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Stephen A. “Organizational Choices and General Management Influence Networks in Divisionalized Companies.” Academy of Management Journal 2 (Sept. 1978): 341–65.Google Scholar
Casciaro, Tiziana, andPiskorski, Mikolaj Jan. “Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (June 2005): 167–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerutti, Mario. “Produccion capitalista y articulacion del empresariado en Monterrey (1890–1910).” Siglo XIX. Revista de Historia V–9 (Jan.-June 1990): 160–70.Google Scholar
Frank, Zephyr. “Elite Families and Oligarchic Politics on the Brazilian Frontier: Mato Grosso, 1889–1937.” Latin American Research Review 36 (Spring 2001): 49–74.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (Nov. 1985): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Stephen. “The Efficiency Consequences of Institutional Change: Financial Market Regulation and Industrial Productivity Growth in Brazil, 1866–1934.” In Latin America and the World Economy Since 1800, eds. John, Coatsworth and Taylor, Alan. Cambridge, Mass., 1998, pp. 115–38.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen. “Financial Markets and Industrial Development: A Comparative Study of Governmental Regulation, Financial Innovation, and Industrial Structure in Brazil and Mexico, 1840–1930.” In How Latin America Fell Behind, ed. Haber, Stephen. Stanford, Calif., 1997, pp. 146–78.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen. “Industrial Concentration and the Capital Markets: A Comparative Study of Brazil, Mexico and the United States, 1830–1930.” Journal ofEconomic History 51 (Sept. 1991): 559–80.Google Scholar
Hanley, Anne. “Business Finance and the Sao Paulo Bolsa, 1886–1917.” In Latin America and the World Economy Since 1800, eds. John, Coatsworth and Taylor, Alan. Cambridge, Mass., 1998, pp. 115–38.Google Scholar
Hanley, Anne. “Is It Who You Know? Entrepreneurs and Bankers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.” Enterprise & Society 5 (June 2004): 187–225.Google Scholar
Huebner, Solomon. “The Distribution of Stockholdings in American Railways.” Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science 22 (Nov. 1903): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kono, Clifford, Donald, Palmer, Roger, Friedland, and Zafonte, Matthew. “Lost in Space: The Geography ofCorporate InterlockingDirectorates.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (Jan. 1998): 863–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, J.R., and Lockhart, D.E. “Increased Environmental Uncertainty and Changes in Board Linkage Patterns.” Academy of Management Journal 33 (March 1990): 106–28.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio, Lopes-de-Silanes, Andrei, Shleifer, and Vishny, Robert. “Law and Finance.” Journal ofPolitical Economy 106 (Dec. 1998): 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio, Lopes-de-Silanes, Andrei, Shleifer, and Vishny, Robert. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance 52 (July 1997): 1131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Joseph L. “Political Participation in Brazil, 1881–1969.” Luso-Brazilian Review VII–2 (Dec. 1970): 3–24.Google Scholar
Maurer, Noel, andHaber, Stephen. “Institutional Change and Economic Growth: Banks, Financial Markets, and Mexican Industrialization.” In The Mexican Economy, 1870–1930: Essays on the Economic History of Institutions, Revolution, and Growth, eds. Bortz, Jeffrey L. and Haber, Stephen H. Stanford, Calif., 2002, pp. 23–49.Google Scholar
Maurer, Noel, and Sharma, Tridib. “Enforcing Property Rights Through Reputation: Mexico’s Early Industrialization, 1878–1913.” Journal of Economic History 61 (Dec. 2001): 950–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Donald, Roger, Friedland, and Singh, Jitendra V. “The Ties that Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network.” American Sociological Review 51 (Dec. 1983): 781–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R. “The External Control of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (Jan. 1978): 358–61.Google Scholar
Quintal, Raquel O. Barcelo. “El desarrollo de la banca en Yucatan; el henequen y la oligarquía henequenera.” In Banca y poder en Mexico, 1800–1925, eds. Ludlow, Leonor and Marichal, Carlos. Meíxico, 1986, pp. 165–208.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth, and Engerman, Stanley. “Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among the New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States.” In How Latin America Fell Behind, ed. Haber, Stephen. Stanford, Calif., 1997, pp. 260–304.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, M. “Corporate Ownership and Control: The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class.” American Journal of Sociology 79 (March 1974): 1073–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newspapers and Reports

Almanak Administrativo, Mercantil e Industrial (“Almanak Laemmert”). Rio de Janeiro, 1889–1914.Google Scholar
Brazilian Yearbook. London, 1909.Google Scholar
Journal do Commercio. Rio de Janeiro, 1889–1930.Google Scholar
Mexican Yearbook: A Statistical, Financial, and Economic Annual, Compiled from Official and Other Returns, 1909–1910. London, 1910.Google Scholar

Unpublished Sources

Castaneda, Gonzalo. “The Barcelonnettes: An Example of Network-Entrepreneurs in XIX Century Mexico. An Explanation Based on a Theory of Bounded Rational Choice with Social Embeddedness.” Universidad de Barcelona, Working Paper. Nov. 2004.Google Scholar
Frank, Zephyr, and Scott, Kevin. “Capitalism in a Middle Register: Business Partnerships in Rio de Janeiro, 1870–1888.” Mimeo, Stanford University. Nov. 2006.Google Scholar
Gomez-Galvarriato, Aurora. “The Impact of the Revolution: Business and Labor in the Mexican Textile Industry, Orizaba, Veracruz, 1900–1930.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1999.Google Scholar
Gomez-Galvarriato, Aurora, and Musacchio, Aldo. “OrganizationalChoice in a French Civil Law Underdeveloped Economy: Partnerships, Corporations and the Chartering ofBusiness in Mexico, 1886–1910.” Working Paper SDTE 295, Division of Economics, CIDE, Mexico, 2004.Google Scholar
Maurer, Noel. “Finance and Oligarchy: Banks, Politics, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1928.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 1997.Google Scholar
Musacchio, Aldo. “Law and Finance in Historical Perspective: Politics, Bankruptcy Law, and Corporate Governance in Brazil, 1850–2002.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 2005.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary, and Colli, Andrea. “Networks, Powerand Politics: The Powerof Business in Britain and Italy before and during the Interwar Period in Comparative Perspective.” Lancaster University Management School Working Paper no. 005. 1999.Google Scholar

Online Sources

Oxford Latin American Economic History Database available at http://oxlad.qeh.ox.ac.uk/index.php. Accessed May 6, 2006.Google Scholar
Pajek available at http://vlado.fmf.uni–lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/. Accessed May 6, 2006.Google Scholar