No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Aid Where It Is Needed Most”: American Labor's Military–Industrial Complex
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2015
Abstract
Between the late 1940s and mid-1960s, American organized labor emerged among the most enthusiastic supporters of the military–industrial complex. This study examines that emerging relationship, focusing on the efforts of a group of unionists to mold defense spending into a vehicle for promoting employment and addressing social and economic problems.
During the Korean War, labor representatives drafted, lobbied for, and helped administration Defense Manpower Policy #4, a policy channeling defense spending to areas suffering high rates of unemployment. With the advent of the Eisenhower administration, preferential policies fell by the wayside, but organized labor continued to press, with some success for defense spending as a general antidote to economic downturns. Late in the 1950s, the Construction Trades Department of Congress of Industrial Organizations and the American Federation of Labor (AFL-CIO), reacting to double-digit unemployment in their ranks, became an active promoter of fallout shelter construction.
Despite some initial success in reimplementing preferential policies during the early months of the Kennedy administration, organized labor's defense agenda quickly ran afoul of Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara's plans to systematize and rationalize the defense sector.
In the end, resistance from military and business leaders greatly impeded labor's progress. At the very least, however, labor's defense agenda reflects a larger social vision and also suggests the very real attraction to many unionists of the military–industrial complex, a malleable economic realm, open to political influence and somewhat removed from the harsh forces of the market.
- Type
- Introduction
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.
References
Bibliography of Works Cited
Bacevich, Andrew. American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of the U.S. Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brinkley, Alan. The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953, 1954. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1958.Google Scholar
Fink, Gary, ed. AFL-CIO Executive Council Statements and Reports, 1956–75, Vol. 2. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Foner, Philip. American Labor and the Indochinese War. New York: International Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steven. Labor Will Rule: Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron. In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America’s Anti-Statism and Its Cold War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Gannon, Francis X. Keenan, Joseph D. Labor’s Ambassador in War and Peace. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael. A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chambers. The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrets, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Paul. The Hammer and the Sword: Labor, the Military, and Industrial Mobilization, 1920–1945. New York: Arno Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Levitan, Sar A. Federal Aid to Depressed Areas, An Evaluation of the Area Redevelopment Administration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Nelson. Labor’s War at Home: The CIO in World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Melman, Seymour. Permanent War Economy: American Capitalism in Decline. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1974.Google Scholar
Moise, Edwin. “JFK and the Myth of Withdrawal.” In A Companion to the Vietnam War, edited by Buzzanco, Robert and Young, Marilyn, 162–73. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
Noble, David. Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knof, 1984.Google Scholar
Peck, Merton J. and Scherer, Frederic M. The Weapons Acquisitions Process: An Economic Analysis. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Schulman, Bruce. From Cotton Belt to Sunbelt: Federal Policy, Economic Development, and the Transformation of the South: 1938–1980. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Sloan, John. Eisenhower and the Management of Prosperity. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Stebenne, David. Arthur Goldberg: New Deal Liberal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Stein, Herbert. The Fiscal Revolution in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Vatter, Harold. The U.S. Economy in the 1950s: An Economic History. New York: Norton, 1963.Google Scholar
Waddell, Brian. The War Against the New Deal. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wehrle, Edmund. “Guns, Butter, Leon Keyserling, the AFL-CIO and the Fate of Full-Employment Economics.” The Historian, 66 (Winter 2004): 730–48.Google Scholar