Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:27:56.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Whig History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Naomi R. Lamoreaux ,
Daniel M. G. Raff  and
Peter Temin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By the end of the twentieth century, it had become clear that the grand synthesis laid out by Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., in The Visible Hand, Scale and Scope, and other writings was badly in need of revision. It was in need of revision because the type of enterprise that Chandler took to be the acme of capitalist economic organization–the large, vertically integrated, horizontally diversified, managerially directed corporation–was clearly in retreat. This development cast into doubt not only the substantive content of Chandler’s interpretation but also its methodological underpinnings.

Type
Symposium: Framing Business History
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 376 - 387
Copyright
Enterprise & Society, Vol. 5 No. 3, © the Business History Conference 2004; all rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Arnold, Horace Lucien, and Faurote, Fay Leone, eds. Ford Methods and the Ford Shops. New York, 1915.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. The Whig Interpretation of History. 1931; London, 1951.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K., ed. The Essential Alfred Chandler: Essays Toward a Historical Theory of Big Business. Boston, 1988.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, Sidney G.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, U.K., 1959.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Lawrence H. A Financial History of the American Automobile Industry: A Study of the Ways in Which the Leading American Producers of Automobiles Have Met Their Capital Requirements. Boston, 1928.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Baker, George, Gibbons, Robert, and Murphy, Kevin J.. “Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (Feb. 2002): 39–83.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Robert. “Firms (and Other Relationships).” In The Twenty-First Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective, ed. DiMaggio, Paul. Princeton, N.J., 2001, pp. 186-99.Google Scholar
Helper, Susan. “Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the US Automobile Industry.” Business History Review 65 (Winter 1991): 781–824.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Raff, Daniel M. G. “Introduction: History and Theory in Search of One Another.” In Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Raff, Daniel M. G. Chicago, 1995, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108 (April 2003): 404-33.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “Introduction.” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. Chicago, 1999, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “New Economic Approaches to the Study of Business History.” Business and Economic History 26 (Fall 1997): 57–79.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “Chandler in a Larger Frame: Markets, Transaction Costs, and Organizational Form in History.” Enterprise & Society 5 (Sept. 2004): 355-75.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (April 2003): 351-85.Google Scholar
Louçã, Francisco, and Mendonça, Sandro. “Steady Change: The 200 Largest US Manufacturing Firms Throughout the 20th Century.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (Aug. 2002): 817-45.Google Scholar
Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “Business History and Recent Economic Theory: Imperfect Information, Incentives, and the Internal Organization of Firms.” In Inside the Business Enterprise: Historical Perspectives on the Use of Information, ed. Temin, Peter. Chicago, 1991, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. “The Division of Labor Is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” Journal of Political Economy 59 (June 1951): 185-93.Google Scholar