Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:46:32.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why spelling matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Valerie Yule
Valerie Yule*
Affiliation:
formerly of Monash University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Does spelling matter? Simon Horobin says that it matters because spelling shows ‘the richness of our language and its history’. He argues for retaining spelling unchanged as a testimony to the ‘richness of our linguistic heritage and a connection with our literary past’. His book shows that until the last two hundred years it was constantly changing, but ‘rather than lamenting the inconsistencies and complexities of English spelling’, Horobin traces ‘how these developed and what they tell us about the fascinating history of our language’.

Type
Reviews
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 59 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, M. 2004. Understanding Spelling. Cambridge: Pegasus.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Stephen, L. & Hutchins, J. 2013. ‘Reserch in Spelling Reform.’ Online at <www.valerieyule.com.au/spellresearch1.htm> (Accessed September 3, 2013).+(Accessed+September+3,+2013).>Google Scholar
Carney, E. 1994. A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2012. Spell it Out: the Singular Story of English Spelling. London: Profile.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Demonet, J-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E. et al. 2001. ‘Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity.’ Science, 291(5511), 2165–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scragg, D. G. 1974. A History of English Spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. 2007. Spelling and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. 2003. ‘Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies.’ British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thackray, D. V. 1982. ‘The effects of a simplified spelling on children's readiness to read.’ In Tune, N. W. 1981. Spelling Reform, a comprehensive Survey of the Advantages, Educational Benefits and Obstacles to Adoption, pp 146–148.Google Scholar
Thorstad, G. 1991. ‘The effect of orthography on the acquisition of literacy skills.’ British Journal of Psychology, 82, 527–37.Google Scholar
Upward, C. 1992. ‘Is traditionl english spelng mor dificlt than jermn?’ Journal of Research in Reading, 15(2), 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upward, C. & Davidson, G. 2011. The History of English Spelling. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. 1997. ‘How learning to spell in German differs from learning to spell in English.’ In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (eds), Learning to Spell. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
Yule, V. 2011. ‘Recent developments which affect spelling.’ English Today, 27(3), 62–7.Google Scholar
Yule, V. 2013. Writing Systems and How They Change. Brisbane: Bookpal.Google Scholar
Yule, V. ‘International writing systems reforms and revolutions.’ Online at <www.valerieyule.com.au/sration.htm> (Accessed September 3, 2013).+(Accessed+September+3,+2013).>Google Scholar