Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:08:14.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pronunciation of TH in word-initial position in Malaysian English

A new dental stop [t] is emerging in a variety of New English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Toshiko Yamaguchi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mesthrie & Bhatt (2008: 125) note that ‘all New Englishes varieties treat [θ] or [ð] as something other than an interdental fricative’. Malaysian English, as a variety of New English, constitutes an interesting case study. In Malaysian English, what Mesthrie & Bhatt (2008: 125) call ‘something other than an interdental fricative’ is realized as the dental stop [t] (e.g. thought), which in this paper is dubbed ‘a new [t]’ or presented orthographically as [th > t], whose acoustic quality is strikingly different from the ordinary alveolar stop [t] (e.g. taught).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azirah, H. & Tan, R. 2012. ‘Malaysian English.’ In Low, E-L. & Azirah, H. (eds), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Baskaran, L. 2005. A Malaysian English Primer: Aspects of Malaysian English Features. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
Baskaran, L. 2008. ‘Malaysian English: Phonology.’ In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), Varieties of English 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 278–91.Google Scholar
Bautista, M. L. S. & Gonzalez, A. B. 2009. ‘Southeast Asian Englishes.’ In Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y. & Nelson, C. L. (eds), The Handbook of World Englishes. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 130–44.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2008. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Amsterdam: Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 1988. ‘Vowel differences between received pronunciation and the English of Malaysia and Singapore: Which ones really matter?’ In Foley, J. (ed.), New Englishes: The Case of Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press, pp. 129–47.Google Scholar
Bulley, M. 2009. ‘The final future of t.’ English Today, 25(2), 55–6.Google Scholar
Cho, T. & Ladefoged, P. 1999. ‘Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages.’ Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207–29.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. 2010. ‘Norms for pronunciation of English in Singapore.’ In Cruz-Ferreira, M. (ed.), Multilingual Norms. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 195–213.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. & Keating, P. A. 1997. ‘Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3728–40.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. 2006. ‘The social life of phonetics and phonology.’ Journal of Phonetics, 34, 409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanulíková, A. & Weber, A. 2010. ‘Production of English interdental fricatives by Dutch, German and English speakers.’ In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wremble, M. & Kul, M. (eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010, Poznań, Poland, 1–3 May 2010. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University, pp. 173–8.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1981. ‘The pragmatics of non-native varieties of English.’ In Smith, L. E. (ed.), English for Cross-Cultural Communication. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
Killingley, S. Y. 1968. ‘The phonology of Malayan English.’ Orbis, 17(1), 57–87.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. 1992. Historical Linguistics: An introduction, 3rd edn.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S. 1964. ‘A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements.’ Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J. & Weber, H. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2003a. ‘Evolutionary patterns of New Englishes and the special case of Malaysian English.’ Asian Englishes, 56(2), 44–63.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2003b. ‘The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth.’ Language, 79, 233–8.Google Scholar
Tongue, R. 1974. The Englishes of Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Eastern University Press.Google Scholar
Wester, F., Gilbers, D. & Lowie, W. 2007. ‘Substitution of dental fricatives in English by Dutch L2 speakers.’ Language Sciences, 29, 477–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar