Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:10:25.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language contact in Shetland Scots and Southern Irish English

Some influences from Norn and Irish Gaelic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

Extract

English is a product of contact with other languages (Hickey, 2010a). This essay explains the major effects of language contact on the languages or dialects involved, using examples from Shetland Scots, which has been influenced by contact with Norn, and from Southern Irish English (S.I.E.), which has been influenced by contact with Irish Gaelic. The focus is on the borrowing of lexical items between Norn and Shetland Scots and of grammatical features between Irish Gaelic and S.I.E. The essay begins with a brief overview of language contact in general and then give examples of the effects of contact from each dialect. Throughout the essay the claim is made that language contact is an ongoing and fluid process and that the examples given merely illustrate the effects of contact necessitated by the particular situation in question, not universal effects of language contact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, M. 1984. ‘Orkney and Shetland Norn.’ In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–66.Google Scholar
Danchev, A. 1988. ‘Language contact and language change.’ Folia Linguistica, 22, 3754.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1984. ‘Irish and English in Ireland.’ In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 480–98.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. 2007. ‘Southern Irish English.’ In Britain, D. (ed.), Language in the British Isles. 2nd Edition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–51.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. 2010a. ‘Contact and change.’ In Hickey, R. (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 149–69. Online at <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781444318159> (Accessed March 29, 2014).Google Scholar
Hickey, R. 2010b. ‘Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment.’ In Hickey, R. (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 128. Online at <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781444318159> (Accessed March 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Jakobsen, J. 1897. The Dialect and Place Names of Shetland. Lerwick: T. and J. Manson.Google Scholar
Knooihuizen, R. 2008. ‘Fishing for words: The taboo language of Shetland fishermen and the dating of Norn language death.’ Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(1), 100–13.Google Scholar
Low, G. 1879. A Tour Through the Islands of Orkney and Schetland: Containing Hints Relative to their Ancient, Modern, and Natural History, Collected in 1774. Kirkwall: W. Peace.Google Scholar
Millar, R. M. 2008. ‘The origins and development of Shetland dialect in light of dialect contact theories.’ English World-Wide, 29(3), 237–67.Google Scholar
Millar, R. M. 2010. ‘The death of Orkney Norn.’ Scottish Language, 29, 2134.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. 2012. ‘The GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET passive and GET recipient variations.’ Linguistics, 50(6), 1111–61.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, A. & Moreno, C. P. A. 2009. ‘The pragmatics of the be + after + V-ing construction in Irish English.’ Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(4), 517–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, O. W. 1992. Old English and its Closest Relatives: A Survey of the Earliest Germanic Languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stalmaszczyk, P. 2005. Celtic Presence: Studies in Celtic Languages and Literatures: Irish, Scottish Gaelic and Cornish. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. 2001. Language Contact. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar